`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 10
`Entered: August 23, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EBAY INC. and PAYPAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`XPRT VENTURES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`
`Cases CBM2017-00024 (Patent 7,610,244 B2)
`CBM2017-00025 (Patent 7,627,538 B2)
`CBM2017-00026 (Patent 7,512,563 B2)
`CBM2017-00027 (Patent 7,483,856 B2)
`CBM2017-00028 (Patent 7,599,881 B2)
`CBM2017-00029 (Patent 7,567,937 B2)1
`
`____________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, KEVIN F. TURNER, and MICHAEL R. ZECHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ZECHER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER RESETTING DUE DATE 7
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`1 This Order addresses an issue that is identical in all six cases. We, therefore,
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each of the six cases. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in any subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`CBM2017-00024 (Patent 7,610,244 B2) CBM2017-00027 (Patent 7,483,856 B2)
`CBM2017-00025 (Patent 7,627,538 B2) CBM2017-00028 (Patent 7,599,881 B2)
`CBM2017-00026 (Patent 7,512,563 B2) CBM2017-00029 (Patent 7,567,937 B2)
`
`
`I. DISCUSSION
`On August 21, 2017, we received an email correspondence from
`Petitioner, eBay, Inc. and PayPal, Inc., requesting an initial conference call
`to discuss rescheduling the oral argument for each of the proceedings
`identified above from the current date of April 19, 2018, to May 3, 2018.
`Petitioner further represented that Patent Owner, XPRT Ventures LLC, does
`not oppose its request to reschedule the oral argument.
`Upon receiving the email correspondence from Petitioner, we checked
`with the Board’s Administrative Staff to determine if there were any hearing
`rooms available on the date of May 3, 2018. After confirming that hearing
`rooms were available on that date, we notified the parties via email that,
`based on the particular circumstances presented here, Petitioner’s request to
`reschedule the oral argument in these cases is granted, and the date of the
`oral argument would be reset to May 3, 2018.
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request to reschedule the oral argument
`in these cases is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that DUE DATE 7, the date of the oral
`argument for these proceedings, is reset to May 3, 2018.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`CBM2017-00024 (Patent 7,610,244 B2) CBM2017-00027 (Patent 7,483,856 B2)
`CBM2017-00025 (Patent 7,627,538 B2) CBM2017-00028 (Patent 7,599,881 B2)
`CBM2017-00026 (Patent 7,512,563 B2) CBM2017-00029 (Patent 7,567,937 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Adrian Percer
`Jared Bobrow
`Brian Chang
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`jared.bobrow@weil.com
`brian.chang@weil.com
`
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`George Likourezos
`g.likourezos@verizon.net
`
`Michael A. Scaturro
`adcourt@optionline.net
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`