throbber
William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
`
` 1 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` 2 BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` 3
`
` 4 ANDERSEN CORPORATION, Case No.
`
` 5 Plaintiff, DER2017-00007
`
` 6 vs. Petitioner Application No.
`
` 7 GED INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, 15/058,862
`
` 8 INC., Respondent Patent No.
`
` 9 Defendant. 9,428,953
`
` 10 - - - - -
`
` 11 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM BRIESE
`
` 12 Taken on Wednesday, September 5th, 2018, at 9:00 o'clock a.m.
`
` 13
`
` 14 At The Offices Of:
`
` 15 Baker Hostetler
`
` 16 127 Public Square
`
` 17 Key Tower, Suite 2000
`
` 18 Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`
` 19
`
` 20 Before Melissa Cruz, a Court Reporter and Notary Public
`
` 21 in and for the State of Ohio
`
` 22 - - - - -
`
` 23
`
` 24
`
` 25
`
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 1 (1)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 1
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
`
` 1 APPEARANCES:
`
` 2
`
` 3 On behalf of the Petitioner:
`
` 4 Robins Kaplan LLP, by
`
` 5 CYRUS A. MORTON, ESQ.
`
` 6 800 LaSalle Avenue
`
` 7 2800 LaSalle Plaza
`
` 8 Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
` 9 (612) 349-8722
`
` 10 Cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`
` 11
`
` 12 On behalf of the Defendant:
`
` 13 Baker Hostetler, by
`
` 14 TOM SHUNK, ESQ.
`
` 15 Key Tower
`
` 16 127 Public Square, Suite 2000
`
` 17 Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`
` 18 (216) 861-7592
`
` 19 Tshunk@bakerlaw.com
`
` 20
`
` 21
`
` 22
`
` 23
`
` 24
`
` 25
`
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 2 (2)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 2
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
`
` 1 APPEARANCES CONTINUED:
`
` 2
`
` 3 Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino, LLP, by
`
` 4 JOHN A. YIRGA, ESQ.
`
` 5 SAMANTHA R. SMART, ESQ.
`
` 6 1300 East Ninth Street, Suite 1700
`
` 7 Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`
` 8 (216) 621-2234 ext. 135
`
` 9 jyirga@tarolli.com
`
` 10 Ssmart@tarolli.com
`
` 11 ----
`
` 12 ALSO PRESENT:
`
` 13 Shelley R. Gilliss, PH.D.
`
` 14 Frank Stanek, Videographer
`
` 15 ----
`
` 16
`
` 17
`
` 18
`
` 19
`
` 20
`
` 21
`
` 22
`
` 23
`
` 24
`
` 25
`
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 3 (3)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 3
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on the
` 1 a jury. You have to tell the truth?
` 2 A. I am aware of that.
` 2 record. This is the videotaped -- or this is the
` 3 videographer Frank Stanek speaking here on behalf
` 3 Q. Is there any reason you'd have
` 4 of Depo International. Today is September 5th,
` 4 difficulty hearing or understanding my questions
` 5 2018. The time is 9:03 a.m. We are at 127
` 5 today and giving truthful and complete answers?
` 6 A. No.
` 6 Public Square, Suite 2000 in Cleveland, Ohio to
` 7 take the videotaped deposition of William Briese
` 7 Q. You're not on any medications, you
` 8 in the matter of Andersen Corporation versus GED
` 8 don't have any hearing loss, nothing like that?
` 9 A. No.
` 9 Integrated Solutions Incorporated in the United
`10 States Patent and Trademark Office Before the
`10 Q. Okay. We do need audible complete
`11 Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case
`11 answers whether you like them or not so the court
`12 DER2017-00007.
`12 reporter can get them down, okay?
`13 A. Okay.
`13 Will counsel please identify
`14 themselves for the video record?
`14 Q. In your participation in this
`15 MR. MORTON: Hi. This is Cy Morton
`15 lawsuit, did you spend any time looking for
`16 from Robins Kaplan on behalf of Andersen
`16 documents?
`17 A. Yes, I did.
`17 Corporation. With me also from Robins Kaplan is
`18 Shelley Gilliss and from Andersen, Kate Graham.
`18 Q. And what did you do in terms of
`19 MR. SHUNK: I am Tom Shunk, Baker
`19 looking for documents that might be relevant?
`20 A. I looked in the likely places that
`20 Hostetler for GED. With me are John Yirga and
`21 those documents would have been located had they
`21 Samantha Smart from the Tarroll firm and Timothy
`22 existed.
`22 McGlinchy from GED is the corporate
`23 representative.
`23 Q. Okay. So did you look for e-mails?
`24 A. Yes.
`24 VIDEOGRAPHER: And will the court
`25 reporter please swear in the witness?
`25 Q. Did you find any relevant e-mails?
`
`Page 4
` 1 WILLIAM BRIESE, of lawful age, called
` 2 for examination, as provided by the Ohio Rules of
` 3 Civil Procedure, being by me first duly sworn, as
` 4 hereinafter certified, deposed and said as
` 5 follows:
` 6 EXAMINATION OF WILLIAM BRIESE
` 7 BY MR. MORTON:
` 8 Q. Good morning, Mr. Briese.
` 9 A. Morning.
`10 Q. First, I want to make sure I got that
`11 right. Is it Briese or Briese?
`12 A. Briese.
`13 Q. Briese, okay. Have you had your
`14 deposition taken before?
`15 A. No, I have not.
`16 Q. Did you have time to prepare for this
`17 deposition with counsel?
`18 A. Yes.
`19 Q. And who did you prepare with?
`20 A. With the team in front of you.
`21 Q. Okay. And how much time would you
`22 say you prepared for the deposition?
`23 A. Several hours.
`24 Q. And you're aware that you're under
`25 oath just like if you were in front of a judge or
`
`Page 6
` 1 A. The e-mails that I did find have been
` 2 disclosed already as part of this matter.
` 3 Q. Do you know if GED has a document
` 4 retention policy?
` 5 A. No, I'm not aware of that.
` 6 Q. All right. Let's go into your
` 7 background a little bit. Tell me your
` 8 educational background again.
` 9 A. I have a bachelor of science in
`10 mechanical engineering from General Motors
`11 Institute, which is now called Kettering
`12 University in Michigan.
`13 Q. And what did you do after, after
`14 college?
`15 A. I was -- I worked for a manufacturing
`16 company that fabricated metal containers for
`17 several of the years. I worked for an equipment
`18 manufacturer related to that industry for several
`19 years after that, and then I worked at GED
`20 starting in 1997.
`21 Q. Okay. And when you started at GED,
`22 what was your role or your position?
`23 A. I was the product engineering
`24 manager.
`25 Q. And what are your responsibilities in
`Page 7
`
`Page 5
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 4 (4 - 7)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 4
`
`

`

` 1 that role?
` 2 A. Essentially the sustaining, the
` 3 sustenance or the ongoing, keeping our existing
` 4 products that we were manufacturing relevant,
` 5 up-to-date and, you know, sellable as products.
` 6 Q. Okay. And was one of those products
` 7 something called Intercept?
` 8 A. Yes.
` 9 Q. So you've been working on the
`10 Intercept product since 1997?
`11 A. Yes.
`12 Q. How would you describe Intercept sort
`13 of in its totality?
`14 A. It is a spacer frame fabrication
`15 system.
`16 Q. Okay. And what all goes into the
`17 system?
`18 A. Several fabrication pieces of
`19 equipment or subassemblies software to drive the
`20 equipment. And then when the spacer frame is
`21 fabricated from a coil stock of tin plated steel
`22 or stainless steel, it gets a sealant applied to
`23 it and a desiccant matrix.
`24 Q. Okay. Can you break it down just a
`25 little farther and just tell me each subassembly
`Page 8
`
`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 applied, what happens?
` 2 A. That is where the first operator's
` 3 station is. The spacer with the sealant and
` 4 desiccant matrix, once that's applied, heads down
` 5 a small conveyor belt, and an operator folds it
` 6 into the shape, the rectangle or whatever shape
` 7 was made upstream.
` 8 Q. And just to be clear, the operator,
` 9 that's -- I mean, a human being takes what's been
`10 created and folds it into a rectangle, if that's
`11 what you're working with?
`12 A. Yeah. At the point when it goes
`13 through the extruder, it's an elongated spacer
`14 frame, and then the operator bends it into a
`15 finished shape.
`16 Q. Okay. And once the operator has bent
`17 it into the finished shape, then what? It can be
`18 used in a window?
`19 A. At that point the sealant and the
`20 spacer frame, it's relatively hot so it would be
`21 hung on some hooks on an overhead conveyor and
`22 that increments to an assembly area where
`23 different operators would retrieve that spacer
`24 that's hanging basically from the ceiling or from
`25 overhead and assemble the spacer onto lights or
`Page 10
`
` 1 in the Intercept system?
` 2 A. It starts at uncoiler, where the
` 3 operator or the person running the machine would
` 4 load a coil of material; like I said, steel or
` 5 other metal stainless steel. The metal cascades
` 6 or it accumulates a small bit, and then it goes
` 7 into what we call a feeder press, which does the
` 8 notching of the strip at predetermined locations.
` 9 It goes into then after that another
`10 short accumulation, and then into a roll former,
`11 which takes the flat strip and progressively
`12 bends it in a U channel or the finished cross
`13 sectional space of the spacer. Immediately after
`14 the roll former is a cut-off press that at that
`15 point parts the spacer frame from the coil stock,
`16 and then it proceeds down a conveyor as a spacer
`17 unit, as a spacer frame.
`18 Q. Okay. And what happens next?
`19 A. It proceeds through. There is a
`20 machine that is in line and attached to the
`21 payout conveyer called a hot melt extruder, which
`22 applies the desiccant matrix to the inside of the
`23 U channel and a sealant to the outside of the
`24 U channel.
`25 Q. Okay. And then after the sealant is
`
` 1 panes of glass.
` 2 Q. Okay. And what's the role of the
` 3 spacer frame in the sealant in making a window?
` 4 A. Its primary purpose is to improve
` 5 thermal performance of a window.
` 6 Q. So can you explain that a little bit
` 7 further? How does it do that?
` 8 A. It's the chamber or the cavity
` 9 between the two pieces of glass acts as an
`10 insulator as compared with a single piece of
`11 glass relatively.
`12 Q. Okay. And so that's what you -- one
`13 of the things that you have been working on or
`14 are responsible for since 1997, is that right?
`15 A. That's correct.
`16 Q. And over that time period, since 1997
`17 and let's just go, say the first ten years you
`18 were working on it, did you make any changes to
`19 the system, any adjustments to the basic nature
`20 of the Intercept?
`21 A. Do you mean to the equipment or to
`22 the finished product, the spacer frame itself?
`23 Q. Well, let's start with the -- let's
`24 start with the equipment, subassemblies that you
`25 went through. Any significant changes over your
`Page 11
`
`Page 9
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 5 (8 - 11)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 5
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 first ten years of working on Intercept?
` 1 would you typically roll that out to all of your
` 2 MR. SHUNK: Objection to lack of
` 2 customers?
` 3 A. Yes.
` 3 clarity with the word significant, but answer if
` 4 you can.
` 4 Q. This process of getting customer
` 5 A. We were always making continual
` 5 feedback and potentially making changes, did you
` 6 improvements to the machinery, to the equipment
` 6 have any policy or guidelines within GED around
` 7 to make it more manufacturable to receive -- we
` 7 that?
` 8 would receive feedback from customers as to what
` 8 A. In the specific -- like I said, it
` 9 could -- how could the machinery be improved from
` 9 was really just informal feedback through e-mails
`10 our service techs, from all different avenues.
`10 or word of mouth. A service technician might
`11 I was responsible for the, basically,
`11 come back and say, this isn't working properly so
`12 continual improvement of that product.
`12 we need to fix this, or we need to change this a
`13 little bit.
`13 Q. All right. So when you would receive
`14 say feedback from customers as you said, can you
`14 Q. I get that. And I'm just asking in
`15 describe that a little further? What would
`15 order to kind of control the intake of that
`16 happen, what would you do if you got a comment or
`16 information, did you or through your superiors
`17 a request from a customer?
`17 have a policy or a frame work or any way that you
`18 A. Well, a service technician might be
`18 described your customer response policy?
`19 installing a new piece of equipment, and I'm not
`19 A. There was a -- basically an Excel
`20 speaking specifically of Intercept, but that
`20 spreadsheet that we maintained that just
`21 would get fed back through a mechanism, and we
`21 basically aggregated change by machine.
`22 would evaluate its merit.
`22 We would categorize it by machine,
`23 and as we would have time to make an improvement
`23 Q. Okay. What do you mean, fed back
`24 to a machine or a, one of the product lines, we
`24 through a mechanism?
`25 A. E-mails, post installation wrap-up
`25 would evaluate the merit --
`
`Page 12
`
`Page 14
`
` 1 meetings between service personnel and
` 2 engineering.
` 3 Q. Okay. So if you receive feedback
` 4 from a customer and it came through your process
` 5 and you thought that that idea had merit, what
` 6 would you do?
` 7 MR. SHUNK: Objection to speculation,
` 8 but answer if you can.
` 9 A. I would evaluate its merit and decide
`10 whether it was worthy of proceeding any further
`11 with it.
`12 Q. All right. And if you had a change,
`13 something that came from a customer that you
`14 decided did have merit, is that something that
`15 you would implement and roll out to all of your
`16 customers if it was a good ideas?
`17 MR. SHUNK: Same objection. Go ahead
`18 and answer.
`19 A. I'm not sure. Could you rephrase
`20 that or I'm not sure that -- just repeat the
`21 question for me.
`22 Q. Sure. I just asked if you had an
`23 idea from a customer that you thought had merit
`24 to change, make some change to the Intercept
`25 system, if you were to implement that change,
`Page 13
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
` 1 Q. Okay.
` 2 A. -- of those changes.
` 3 Q. Have you ever heard it said that GED
` 4 has an open innovation policy?
` 5 A. I've never heard that. I don't know
` 6 what that means.
` 7 Q. Over time on the original Intercept,
` 8 did you make changes to the software that were
` 9 customer driven?
`10 A. No, I did not. That was outside of
`11 the scope of my responsibility at GED.
`12 Q. If there was a change to software
`13 that was needed or suggested, what would you do
`14 with such a request?
`15 MR. SHUNK: Objection to speculation.
`16 Go ahead.
`17 A. That was normally handled through the
`18 software personnel that were responsible for that
`19 aspect of the product.
`20 Q. Okay. And say in the -- let's break
`21 it up to a couple of time periods.
`22 So when you started in 1997, who was
`23 in charge of the software?
`24 A. Our software manager was Paul Dorsch.
`25 Q. And is that still the software
`
`Page 15
`
`Page 6 (12 - 15)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 6
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 manager, or is he not there anymore?
` 1 through?
` 2 A. He's not at GED anymore, I don't
` 2 A. From the perspective of making it
` 3 believe.
` 3 more manufacturable, yes.
` 4 Q. Yeah. And so when did it change to
` 4 Q. Okay. Again, can you give me an
` 5 somebody new as software manager?
` 5 example so I can understand what you mean by
` 6 A. I don't know the time frame of when
` 6 that?
` 7 he retired. I couldn't guess as to when he no
` 7 A. I am trying to think of an example.
` 8 longer worked at GED.
` 8 An example is not coming to mind right now. It
` 9 was quite a long time ago.
` 9 Q. Okay. Well, who's the next software
`10 manager that you remember?
`10 Q. Sure. Do you remember making any
`11 A. Tony DiFiore.
`11 significant changes to the punch and dye that's
`12 Q. And do you know when he started in
`12 used with the system?
`13 A. No.
`13 that role?
`14 A. At the time at which Paul Dorsch
`14 Q. When did you start working with Tim
`15 retired. I don't know that time frame.
`15 McGlinchy that's sitting here at counsel table?
`16 A. He hired me in 1997.
`16 Q. Okay. Is it, you know, the mid
`17 2000s?
`17 Q. Has he been your boss since 97 then?
`18 A. I just don't recall. I don't -- I
`18 A. There was a brief period of time
`19 honestly don't recall that time frame.
`19 where he was not my direct supervisor.
`20 Q. All right. Who was the software
`20 Q. But otherwise, yes?
`21 A. Otherwise, yes.
`21 manager in 2009?
`22 A. I don't know.
`22 Q. And how about Cliff, Clifford Weber;
`23 Q. You don't know which of those two
`23 how long have you known him?
`24 A. Since he started working at GED.
`24 guys it was?
`25 A. I just can't recall.
`25 Q. Which was when?
`
`Page 16
`
` 1 Q. But it was one of those two?
` 2 A. It was one of those two guys.
` 3 Q. So if you did make changes to the
` 4 software, what kind of changes did you make to
` 5 the Intercept system in response to customer
` 6 request?
` 7 MR. SHUNK: Objection. Speculation.
` 8 Go ahead.
` 9 A. The majority, if not all, of the
`10 changes I made to the Intercept were to make it
`11 as a machine or as a product more manufacturable.
`12 Q. Okay. So I can understand that
`13 better, can you give me some examples?
`14 A. Essentially when I was hired, the
`15 Intercept machine was young. It was a relatively
`16 new product, and the drawings were lacking
`17 detail, ambiguity in some of the specifications
`18 on how to fabricate the parts, and the machines
`19 weren't being built as efficiently as we, or as
`20 GED felt they could have been.
`21 So I was hired to clean up and
`22 streamline the manufacturing and assembly of the
`23 Intercept product.
`24 Q. Okay. Did you make any specific
`25 changes to any of the subassemblies we went
`Page 17
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 18
` 1 A. I don't have the exact time frame.
` 2 Q. Can you give me your best guess?
` 3 A. I would have to look at my records to
` 4 tell you when Clifford Weber was hired.
` 5 Q. He's still there at GED?
` 6 A. He's still at GED.
` 7 Q. And what's his role or position?
` 8 A. He's an R&D technician.
` 9 Q. Does he report to you?
`10 A. Yes.
`11 Q. Has that always been the case?
`12 A. Yes.
`13 Q. Mr. Briese, I am handing you what's
`14 been marked in this proceeding as Exhibit 1009.
`15 Can you take a look at that document
`16 for me? Do you recognize that document?
`17 A. Yes, I do.
`18 Q. Okay. Can you identify it for the
`19 record?
`20 A. It is the Intercept spacer frame
`21 finished quality specification.
`22 Q. Okay. And what's the purpose of that
`23 document?
`24 A. Just what the title says.
`25 Q. Can you elaborate in your own words?
`Page 19
`
`Page 7 (16 - 19)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 7
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 A. It is the specific criteria that is
` 1 was a change made somewhere between pages 13 and
` 2 used to fabricate an Intercept spacer frame.
` 2 15, and splay.
` 3 Q. Okay. And the front page, page 1 has
` 3 Q. You don't recall the change you made?
` 4 A. The splay change was made on page 8.
` 4 revision history, do you see that?
` 5 A. Yes.
` 5 I don't have the previous revision to know what
` 6 the old numbers were, and then there was a bow
` 6 Q. These are the changes that were made
` 7 change later in the document, and I don't know if
` 7 up through 2010, it looks like?
` 8 A. I see that.
` 8 it was side bow or up/down bow, but it is
` 9 essentially just tolerancing changes of the same
` 9 Q. Okay. Can you tell me, there is a
`10 exact identical shape. -
`10 revision in 5/13/09 by Roger Eberwein. Can you
`11 tell me what that revision was?
`11 Q. Okay. So the basic design of
`12 A. This was a change or an addition to
`12 Intercept doesn't change --
`13 the specification when the Intercept ULTRA
`13 A. No. The basic design did not change
`14 product was issued or released, which is a
`14 whatsoever.
`15 stainless steel material.
`15 Q. All right. I want to go through, you
`16 Q. Okay. And what specifically is a
`16 know, the original Intercept here and how it
`17 change that had to be made for that?
`17 works, how this document works in a little more
`18 A. It says here, removed tolerances on
`18 detail if you don't mind. If you turn to page 5,
`19 punch detail 3 on page 4 and 5. I am not sure
`19 please?
`20 what that means without looking, without
`20 A. Okay.
`21 comparing this to the previous revision. That's
`21 Q. Can you -- let's just walk through
`22 hard to tell.
`22 the page for starters. What is the first figure
`23 And its swage increase, that would be
`23 at the top of that page?
`24 on page 9, and crimping information.
`24 A. That is an image of the pre-notched
`25 metal strip with the various features that are
`25 Q. So are these the changes that were
`Page 20
` 1 made in order to use the certain type of material
` 2 for the spacer frame?
` 3 A. It's hard to say that definitively
` 4 without looking at the previous revision as to
` 5 what, in comparing the two. I can't say
` 6 definitively or without exception, if that makes
` 7 sense.
` 8 Q. It doesn't make sense to me because I
` 9 don't know this stuff like you do. I'm just
`10 trying to get a feel for what the purpose of this
`11 change was and what was done.
`12 A. Like I said, the essence of this
`13 change revolved around the issuance of a new
`14 material, a new Intercept material type called
`15 ULTRA. That's what this change essentially
`16 represents.
`17 Q. Okay. It's not a change to the basic
`18 design of the spacer frame?
`19 A. No.
`20 Q. All right. And how about the next
`21 revision, which was by you on 8/18/2010? It says
`22 updates splay and bow specification. Can you
`23 explain to me what that change was?
`24 A. Again, I don't know the specifics,
`25 but it's towards the end of the document. There
`Page 21
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
` 1 used to make a spacer frame.
` 2 Q. Okay. What do you mean, pre-notched?
` 3 A. I mean, it's notched before it gets
` 4 roll formed. That's what we refer to as
` 5 pre-notching.
` 6 Q. Okay. So you're -- so what are the
` 7 notches? What are you referring to as notches
` 8 then?
` 9 A. The corners, the tab, the gas holes
`10 and the muntin location of notches.
`11 Q. So you're saying this is showing all
`12 of those. They've already been stamped or
`13 punched or created?
`14 A. All of those features are in this
`15 strip.
`16 Q. Okay. I think -- let's go ahead and
`17 put a mark on this exhibit for 1030, because I
`18 want to have you draw a couple things on there
`19 and it will create a new exhibit.
`20 - - - - -
`21 (Thereupon, Plaintiff's Deposition Exhibit-1049
`22 was marked for purposes of identification.)
`23 - - - - -
`24 (Off the record conversation had.)
`25 BY MR. MORTON:
`
`Page 22
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 8 (20 - 23)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 8
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 on the right, that's the end of that spacer
` 1 Q. Okay. Can we go back to page 5,
` 2 frame?
` 2 Mr. Briese? So can you -- I just want to go
` 3 A. Yes.
` 3 through each of the features.
` 4 Q. Can you indicate where the corners
` 4 And what we're looking at there is a
` 5 are?
` 5 flat piece of metal, right?
` 6 A. The circle with the arrow indicated C
` 6 A. Yes.
` 7 punch detail number 2 would be a corner.
` 7 Q. And it's been punched along the sides
` 8 Q. Okay. And so how is a corner created
` 8 to create the features you were just talking
` 9 by that punch detail 2?
` 9 about?
`10 A. With a pre-notching press and a set
`10 A. Correct.
`11 of tool and dyes that form that feature.
`11 Q. And the figures below, are those
`12 Q. And it looks to me, are there three
`12 showing the punches that you used to make those
`13 identical corners?
`13 features?
`14 A. In this depiction, yes.
`14 A. Well, it says detail 1, detail 2 and
`15 detail 3, so those -- each of those features are
`15 Q. Well, is there -- is this not the
`16 broken out into detail below.
`16 right depiction we should be looking at?
`17 A. You are correct. There's three.
`17 Q. Okay. And those are matched and
`18 Q. Okay. So for Intercept we have three
`18 pointing to where they are in the top figure?
`19 A. Yes.
`19 identical corners, right?
`20 A. Yes.
`20 Q. Can you first indicate on there, draw
`21 Q. And those are each created by each of
`21 on there where really one spacer frame begins and
`22 the sets of notches created by punch detail 2?
`22 ends?
`23 A. Yes.
`23 A. What do you want to call it? What do
`24 you want to call this?
`24 Q. And does each of those represent one
`25 strike of the punch?
`25 Q. I want to call it whatever you would
`
`Page 24
`
`Page 26
`
` 1 call it, but I just want to indicate, so we can
` 2 understand, because these things have, you know,
` 3 kind of continuous frames and have to be cut off
` 4 somewhere, right?
` 5 A. Right. So this would be -- this is
` 6 the end, and this is the start or beginning.
` 7 Q. Okay. And where is that
` 8 corresponding spot in the upper figure?
` 9 A. It's in detail 1.
`10 Q. Right. Can you indicate -- can you
`11 draw on the upper figure where that goes on that
`12 same line?
`13 A. On the top figure it would be here.
`14 Q. Okay. So that marks the beginning of
`15 a spacer frame. And then where is the other --
`16 where is the end of that one?
`17 A. The end is to the left of the line I
`18 drew, and the beginning is to the right.
`19 Q. Okay. And if you move further to the
`20 right, do you get to the end of that one, or is
`21 that not how it works?
`22 A. Yes. That would be the end of -- so
`23 we're showing one full spacer frame and parts of
`24 adjacent spacer frames.
`25 Q. Okay. So the far end of the figure
`
` 1 A. Correct.
` 2 Q. And then how about the fourth corner,
` 3 where is that located?
` 4 A. The fourth corner would be depicted
` 5 in detail one.
` 6 Q. Okay. And how is that corner
` 7 different from the other three?
` 8 A. It's different because it is attached
` 9 to the tab.
`10 Q. Okay. Can you indicate maybe in red,
`11 just label the parameters of what the tab is on
`12 there?
`13 A. Do you want me to label the tab?
`14 Q. Yes.
`15 A. Okay.
`16 Q. Okay. And can you also label it on
`17 the upper figure?
`18 A. Right by the arrow tab.
`19 Q. And that's created with a different
`20 punch, is that right?
`21 A. Different from the corner, yes.
`22 Q. So the -- is it true that one side of
`23 the fourth corner is identical to the other
`24 corners?
`25 A. To be honest with you, I don't really
`Page 27
`
`Page 25
`Depo International, Inc.
`(763) 591-0535 | info@depointernational.com
`
`Page 9 (24 - 27)
`
`DER2017-00007
`Andersen v. GED
`Ex. 1057 - Page 9
`
`

`

`William Briese - 9/5/2018
`Andersen Corporation vs. GED Integrated Solutions, Inc.
` 1 understand what you just asked me.
` 1 A. Never.
` 2 Q. Yeah. I'm not sure if I do either.
` 2 Q. And if you wanted to make a chance to
` 3 I'm just looking at the notch there that starts
` 3 the software, what would you have to do?
` 4 A. I would have no idea where to even
` 4 the fourth corner. Is the first side of it, the
` 5 start to -- how to answer that question because I
` 5 first side of the V, if you will, the same as the
` 6 am not a software engineer. I have no idea.
` 6 other corners?
` 7 A. It's similar.
` 7 Q. You'd have to ask the software people
` 8 Q. What's the difference?
` 8 for the changes?
` 9 A. Well, if we're going to be specific
` 9 A. It's not something I'm familiar with
`10 there is .232 dimension on the tab and a .222
`10 so someone else has to do it.
`11 dimension on the corner.
`11 Q. I get that. But if you wanted to get
`12 Q. So you're referring to the punch
`12 it done, there would be somebody at GED -- we
`13 detail 1 and punch detail 2 parameters shown
`13 talked about a couple names earlier -- that you
`14 there. A lot of them look to be identical.
`14 could ask for a software change?
`15 A. They're very similar.
`15 A. Oh, yeah.
`16 Q. But there's a difference I see in the
`16 Q. And did you ever do that in working
`17 sort of the height to partway up the notch,
`17 on the original Intercept?
`18 A. I didn't need to, to the best of my
`18 right?
`19 A. Yes.
`19 recollection. I don't remember doing that.
`20 Q. And why is there that difference from
`20 Q. Okay. So you're more in charge, at
`21 .232 in the fourth corner and .222 in each of the
`21 least in this area, in the dimensions of the
`22 other corners?
`22 punch and dye, is that fair?
`23 A. It's really -- that is simply there
`23 A. Yes, more the physical or the
`24 for fabrication setup reasons. It's a starting
`24 mechanical side of the Intercept product.
`25 point at which -- there's a lot that goes into
`25 Q. And does GED manufacture the punch
`Page 30
`Page 28
` 1 these locations as far as the finished spacer
` 2 quality. And these are dimensions or starting
` 3 points to achieve the best finished spacer
` 4 quality.
` 5 Q. Okay. Describe to me a little more
` 6 how the system works here. What does the
` 7 software do in terms of this punching process?
` 8 A. I can only give you -- I can't give
` 9 you how the software works. I can't tell you
`10 that because I don't do that. It's outside of my
`11 expertise. I don't know anything about that.
`12 You program in either through some
`13 front end office order entry software or at the
`14 machine the size of the window you want, and it
`15 produces the notches at the predetermined
`16 locations that has been entered or keyed in by an
`17 operator.
`18 Q. Okay. So the -- I mean, the strip of
`19 metal is -- I don't know where it is. It's in
`20 place. It's on a conveyer. It's somehow being
`21 passed into the area where the punches are and
`22 the software decides when to stamp?
`23 A. Yes.
`24

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket