throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET AL.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00001
`Patent 6,778,074
`____________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REVISED MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`In compliance with the Board’s March 14, 2013 Decision (Paper 34), Patent
`
`Owner Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC (hereinafter “Patent Owner”) respectfully
`
`submits this Revised Motion to Seal certain documents contained in Exhibits 3000
`
`and 4000 accompanying its Response (Paper 31) and Motion to Amend (Paper 32),
`
`both filed March 11, 2013.
`
`

`
`Patent Owner appreciates the Board’s permission to submit this Revised
`
`
`
`Motion to Seal and the guidance provided in its Decision. In accordance with the
`
`Decision, Patent Owner identifies the following fewer Exhibits B, I, J, K, L, and P
`
`of Exhibits 3000 and 4000 containing confidential information and explains the
`
`good cause for placing them under seal. Patent Owner certifies conference and
`
`agreement with Petitioner Garmin International, Inc. et al. (hereinafter
`
`“Petitioner”) regarding the proposed protective order and the scope of the proposed
`
`protective order. Finally, Patent Owner provides a copy of the default protective
`
`order set forth in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide as the proposed protective
`
`order.
`
`I. Good Cause Exists for Sealing Certain Confidential Information.
`
`
`
`The following Exhibits contain confidential information:
`
`A. Exhibit B of Exhibits 3000 and 4000 (Giuseppe Cuozzo’s Driver History
`Report).
`
`Confidential personal information on Exhibit B of Exhibits 3000 and 4000
`
`includes inventor Giuseppe Cuozzo’s driving record maintained by the State of
`
`New Jersey. Disclosure of the information in the record would result in
`
`embarrassment to Mr. Cuozzo. (Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48760 (Aug. 14, 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(c)(1)(G)). Although driving
`
`records are available from the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, their
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2012-00001
`Patent No: 6,778,074
`
`confidential nature is demonstrated by the need to submit the driver’s license
`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: CUO0001-RE
`Page 3
`
`
`
`
`number and last four digits of the driver’s social security number in order to obtain
`
`a copy.
`
`B. Exhibits I and J of Exhibits 3000 and 4000 (Attorney’s Patentability Search
`Report and Inventor’s comments thereto).
`
`These two exhibits include information protected by the attorney-client
`
`privilege and although Patent Owner’s reliance upon the facts set forth therein
`
`effects a narrow waiver of the privilege for purposes of this inter partes review and
`
`between these parties, Patent Owner respectfully requests the Board seal these
`
`documents in furtherance of Patent Owner’s and inventor’s intent and effort to
`
`limit the extent of any waiver and guard against unnecessary litigation concerning
`
`the issue of a broad waiver, which would cause Patent Owner and the inventor
`
`Giuseppe Cuozzo undue burden, expense, and oppression.
`
`To be clear, Patent Owner does not intend to limit Petitioner’s discovery
`
`efforts in this proceeding relating to the facts in these documents that are relevant
`
`to the inventor’s declaration and assertion of pre-filing conception and diligent
`
`reduction to practice. Patent Owner asserts, however, that any waiver of the
`
`attorney-client privilege relating to this matter is narrow and does not affect a
`
`broad waiver of the privilege such that communications with IPR counsel or trial
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2012-00001
`Patent No: 6,778,074
`
`counsel in the related district court action are discoverable. If these documents are
`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: CUO0001-RE
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`not sealed, third-parties may argue their publication affects a broad waiver of the
`
`privilege, imposing unnecessary and undue burden and expense on Patent Owner
`
`and inventor. Id.
`
`C. Exhibit K of Exhibits 3000 and 4000 (Inventor’s Agreement with Invention
`Submission Corporation).
`
`This exhibit constitutes confidential business information relating to the
`
`inventor’s agreement with Invention Submission Corporation (hereinafter “ISC”),
`
`the financial terms of the agreement with ISC, and details about the inventor’s
`
`efforts to seek legal counsel to seek patent protection. If published, this
`
`information potentially would expose the inventor to embarrassment, undue
`
`burden, expense, and oppression as a result of his interaction with ISC and expose
`
`confidential business information relating to his engagement of ISC for
`
`promotional work. Id.
`
`D. Exhibit L of Exhibits 3000 and 4000 (Inventor’s receipt for payments to
`Invention Submission Corporation under Agreement).
`
`This exhibit constitutes confidential personal financial information that
`
`potentially would cause the inventor embarrassment if published. The manner and
`
`amount of his payments to ISC under their agreement reveals information about his
`
`personal financial status. Id.
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2012-00001
`Patent No: 6,778,074
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: CUO0001-RE
`Page 5
`
`E. Exhibit P of Exhibits 3000 and 4000 (Personal check from Inventor’s
`Family).
`
`This exhibit constitutes confidential personal financial information of the
`
`inventor’s family member including checking account and bank information.
`
`Publication of this information may cause embarrassment, oppression, and possibly
`
`would expose the inventor’s family to criminal attempts to access their personal
`
`financial accounts. Id.
`
`II. Certification of Non-Publication.
`
`On behalf of Patent Owner, undersigned counsel certifies the information
`
`sought to be sealed by this Revised Motion to Seal has not been published or
`
`otherwise made public. Efforts to maintain the confidentiality of this information
`
`have been undertaken by Patent Owner in a related district court proceeding. In
`
`that proceeding, this information was produced under the Protective Order entered
`
`in that case and designated confidential.
`
`III. Certification of Conference with Opposing Party Pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. § 42.54.
`
`Patent Owner has in good faith conferred with Petitioner and has reached
`
`agreement with Petitioner as to the scope of the proposed protective order.
`
`Petitioner has stated to Patent Owner that Petitioner will not oppose any revised
`
`motion to seal regarding Exhibits B, I, J, K, L, and P of Exhibits 3000 and 4000, as
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2012-00001
`Patent No: 6,778,074
`
`described above. Petitioner has further stated to Patent Owner that Petitioner
`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: CUO0001-RE
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`agrees to the Board’s default protective order.
`
`IV. Revised Exhibits 3001 and 4001 (Cuozzo Declaration with Non-
`Protective Order Material) and Revised Exhibits 3000 and 4000
`(Protective Order Material of Cuozzo Declaration)
`
`Patent Owner respectfully submits the attached Revised Exhibits 3001 and
`
`4001, which replace Exhibits 3001 and 4001 filed with Patent Owner’s Response
`
`(Paper 31) and Motion to Amend (Paper 32), respectively, on March 11, 2013.
`
`Specifically, Revised Exhibits 3001 and 4001 each include the Declaration of
`
`Giuseppe A. Cuozzo Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.131 with non-protective order
`
`material, i.e., Exhibits A, C-H, and M-O.
`
`Further, Patent Owner respectfully submits the attached Revised Exhibits
`
`3000 and 4000, which replace Exhibits 3000 and 4000 filed with Patent Owner’s
`
`Response (Paper 31) and Motion to Amend (Paper 32), respectively, on March 11,
`
`2013. Specifically, Revised Exhibits 3000 and 4000 each include protective order
`
`material of the Declaration of Giuseppe A. Cuozzo Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.131,
`
`i.e., Exhibits B, I, J, K, L, and P.
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2012-00001
`Patent No: 6,778,074
`
`
`V. Proposed Protective Order.
`
`
`
`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: CUO0001-RE
`Page 7
`
`
`
`The Protective Order attached hereto as Exhibit 5000 is the Board’s Default
`
`Protective Order to which the Parties agree to be bound in this matter. Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48771 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/John R. Kasha/
`John R. Kasha, Reg. No. 53,100
`Kasha Law LLC
`14532 Dufief Mill Rd.
`North Potomac, MD 20878
`(703) 867-1886, telephone
`(301) 340-3022, facsimile
`Email: john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`Cabrach J. Connor
`Reed Scardino LLP
`301 Congress Ave. Ste. 1250
`Austin, Texas 78701
`(512) 615-5989
`(512) 474-2622 facsimile
`Email: cconnor@reedscardino.com
`
`David Skeels
`Friedman Suder & Cooke
`604 East 4th Street
`Suite 200
`Fort Worth, TX 76012
`Email: skeels@fsclaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Cuozzo Speed Technologies
`LLC
`(IPR Trial No. 2012-00001)
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2012-00001
`Patent No: 6,778,074
`
`
`
`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: CUO0001-RE
`Page 8
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on the 21st day of March 2013, a true and correct copy
`
`of Patent Owner’s Revised Motion to Seal including Exhibit 5000, and Revised
`
`Exhibits 3000, 3001, 4000, and 4001has been provided, via electronic mail to
`
`counsel of record as follows:
`
`jbailey@hoveywilliams.com (Jennifer C. Bailey, Lead Counsel)
`sbrown@hoveywilliams.com (Scott R. Brown, Back-Up Counsel)
`jcrawford@hoveywilliams.com (Justin Crawford, Paralegal)
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/John R. Kasha/
`John R. Kasha, Reg. No. 53,100
`Attorney for Cuozzo Speed Technologies
`LLC
`
`
`
`Kasha Law LLC
`14532 Dufief Mill Rd.
`North Potomac, MD 20878
`(703) 867-1886, telephone
`(301) 340-3022, facsimile
`Email: john.kasha@kashalaw.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket