throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00001
`Patent 6,778,074
`
`____________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to the Board’s January 9, 2013, Scheduling Order (Paper 16),
`
`Petitioner, Garmin International, Inc., respectfully requests oral argument for the
`
`trial currently scheduled on August 16, 2013. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70,
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`The Proper Claim Construction of “Integrally Attached.”
`
`Cuozzo’s Attempt to Swear Behind Aumayer and Awada.
`
`III. Whether Claims 10, 14, and 17 are Unpatentable Based on the
`
`Instituted Rejections.
`
`a. Whether each of the elements of claims 10, 14, and 17 are taught
`
`or suggested in the asserted prior art.
`
`b. Whether there is a reason to combine the asserted prior art.
`
`IV. Whether Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend Should Be Granted.
`
`a. Whether substitute claims 21-23 improperly enlarge the scope of
`
`the original claims.
`
`b. Whether substitute claims 21-23 improperly add new matter.
`
`c. Whether substitute claims 21-23 are unpatentable over Nagoshi in
`
`view of Vaughn.
`
`d. Whether substitute claims 21-22 are unpatentable over Aumayer
`
`and Vaughn or Tegethoff and Vaughn.
`
`

`

`e. Whether substitute claim 23 is unpatentable over Aumayer,
`
`Nagoshi, and Vaughn or Tegethoff, Nagoshi, and Vaughn.
`
`f. Whether substitute claims 21-22 are unpatentable over Aumayer,
`
`Vaughn, Evans, and Wendt or Tegethoff, Vaughn, Evans, and
`
`Wendt.
`
`In the event any fees are required for this Request, please charge Deposit
`
`Account No. 19-0522.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Dated: July 12, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
` By: s/ Jennifer C. Bailey
`
`
`
`Jennifer C. Bailey, Reg. No. 52,583
`
`Scott R. Brown, Reg. No. 40,535
`10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000
`Overland Park, KS 66210
`P: (913) 647-9050
`F: (913) 647-9057
`jcb@hoveywilliams.com
`srb@hoveywilliams.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 53,394
`Jason R. Mudd, Reg. No. 57,700
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`6201 College Blvd., Suite 300
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`P: (913) 777-5600
`F: (913) 777-5601
`Eric.Buresh@EriseIP.com
`Jason.Mudd@EriseIP.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`(IPR Trial No. 2012-00001)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that on July 12, 2013, a true and correct copy of Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Argument  has been provided, via electronic mail to counsel of
`
`record as follows:
`
`Email: john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`Email: cconnor@reedscardino.com
`Email: jdeats@reedscardino.com
`
`Email: skeels@fsclaw.com
`
`John Robert Kasha, Esq.
`KASHA LAW LLC
`
`Cabrach J. Connor
`Jason W. Deats
`REED & SCARDINO LLP
`
`David A. Skeels
`FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER, CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Jennifer C. Bailey
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket