`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`XILINX, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2012-00018
`
`Patent 7,566,960
`
`NOTICE OF STIPULATION OF DUE DATES
`
`
`
`Petitioner, Intellectual Ventures Management LLC, and Patent Owner,
`
`Xilinx, Inc, jointly stipulate to move Due Dates 2 and 3 as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`Stipulated Date
`‘
`Original Date
`|
`August 27, 2013
`‘
`August 12, 2013
`i Due Date 2
`
`
`
`‘ Due Date 3 September 24, 2013 September 12, 2013 ‘
`
`
`
`
`These due dates were originally set in the Scheduling Order dated February 12,
`
`2013. Attached is a photocopy of the Scheduling Order Appendix, with the old
`
`Due Dates crossed out and the new dates inserted above. This paper is being filed
`
`by Intellectual Ventures Management LLC with the approval of counsel for Xilinx,
`
`Inc.
`
` DATE: July 19,2013
`
`By:
`
`Michael D. pecht (Reg. No. 54,463)
`Lead Counsel
`
`Robert Greene Sterne (Reg. No. 28,912)
`Backup Counsel
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`
`Washington, DC. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`Intellectual Ventures Management LLC
`
`
`
`Case IPRZOlZ—OOOl 8
`
`Patent 7,566,960
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 .........................................................May 13, 2013
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`fiagzzst ;::“3’ :38 ji 3%
`DUE DATE 2 ......................................................August/4 ZMGT
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`Eééeptemiiez- 23%: 28%.}
`DUE DATE 3Scptember1w~5-~291§w
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 .................................................. October 3, 2013
`
`Petitioner’s motion for observation regarding cross-examination of
`
`reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 .................................................. October 17, 2013
`
`Patent owner’s response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ................................................... October 24, 2013
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 .................................................. November 7, 2013
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`UI
`
`
`
`IPR2012-00018
`
`Patent 7,566,960
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 19th day of July, 2013, a true and correct copy of
`
`the foregoing NOTICE OF STIPULATION OF DUE DATES was served upon the
`
`following counsel for Patent Owner, XilinX Inc.
`
`David L. McCombs, Lead Counsel
`
`ATTN: IP DOCKETING
`
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`
`david.mccon'1'b§@,haynesboone.com
`
`Thomas B. King
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`
`18100 Von Karrnan, Suite 750
`
`Irvine, CA 92612
`
`
`thornas.king@havnesboone.corn
`
`Robert G. Sterne, Backup Counsel (Reg. No. 50,633)
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`
`Washington, DC. 20005
`(202) 371 -2600
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Intellectual Ventures Management LLC
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
