`Entered: July 24, 2013
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`XILINX, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00018 (SCM)
`Patent 7,566,960
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and
`JUSTIN T. ARBES, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`On July 23, 2013 a conference call was held with counsel for the
`respective parties and Administrative Patent Judges Medley, Easthom, and
`Arbes.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00018
`Patent 7,566,960
`
`
`The purpose of the call was for Xilinx to request authorization to file a
`substitute motion to amend.
`Counsel for Xilinx explained that Xilinx’s first substitute motion to
`amend (Paper 22) was filed prior to the Board’s decision in Idle Free
`Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR2012-00027, Paper 26 (June 11, 2013).
`Xilinx seeks to file another substitute motion to amend in order to comply
`with the Idle Free decision. IVM does not oppose Xilinx filing another
`substitute motion to amend for the sole purpose of complying with the Idle
`Free decision.
`Based on the facts presented and the facts of this case, Xilinx’s
`request to file a second substitute motion to amend for the sole purpose of
`complying with the Idle Free decision is granted. The motion is due no later
`than July 29, 2013.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Via electronic transmission:
`
`Michael D. Specht
`Robert G. Sterne
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005-3932
`MSPECHT@skgf.com
`RSTERNE@skgf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00018
`Patent 7,566,960
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Via electronic transmission:
`
`David L. McCombs
`Thomas B. King
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`david.mccombs@haynesboone.com
`ipr.thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
