`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 33
`
`
`
` Entered: October 16, 2013
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`XILINX, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2012-00018 (Patent 7,566,960)
`IPR2012-00019 (Patent 8,062,968) 1
`____________
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and
`JUSTIN T. ARBES, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
` 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10)
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses an issue that is identical in the two cases. Therefore,
`we exercise discretion to issue one order to be filed in both cases. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2012-00018 and IPR2012-00019
`Patents 7,566,960 and 8,062,968
`
`
`Petitioner requests a hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 in each of
`the two cases. Petitioner’s requests are granted.2
`Each party will have sixty (60) minutes of total time to present
`arguments for the two cases. Petitioner will proceed first to present its case
`for IPR2012-00018. Thereafter, Patent Owner will present its case for
`IPR2012-00018. Each party may reserve rebuttal time. The same format
`will follow for IPR2012-00019. Because the two cases are related with
`overlapping issues, the Board anticipates that the parties will use more of
`their total sixty-minute allotted time for IPR2013-00018.
`The hearing will commence at 9:00 AM Eastern Time, on November
`7, 2013, and it will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come-first-
`served basis.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed at the Board two
`business days prior to the hearing, and the parties must initiate a conference
`call with the Board by two business days prior to the hearing to resolve any
`dispute over the propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`
`
`2 Patent Owner did not file a request for oral argument in either case.
`Accordingly, if Petitioner determines that oral argument is not necessary,
`Petitioner shall contact the Board as soon as possible.
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2012-00018 and IPR2012-00019
`Patents 7,566,960 and 8,062,968
`
`whole or in part. If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the
`Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than
`two days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Via electronic transmission:
`
`Michael D. Specht
`Robert G. Sterne
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`MSPECHT@skgf.com
`RSTERNE@skgf.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Via electronic transmission:
`
`David L. McCombs
`Thomas B. King
`Henry L. Welch
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`ipr.thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`ipr.henry.welch@haynesboone.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
