`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 15
`Entered: February 12, 2013
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`XILINX, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2012-00020
`Patent 8,058,897
`_______________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and JUSTIN T. ARBES,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`A. DUE DATES
`
`
`
`This order sets due dates for the parties to take action in this trial. The
`
`parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE DATES 1 through 3 (earlier or
`
`later, but no later than DUE DATE 4). A notice of the stipulation, specifically
`
`identifying the changed due dates, must be promptly filed. The parties may not
`
`stipulate to an extension of DUE DATES 4-7.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00020
`Patent 8,058,897
`
`
`
`In stipulating to different times, the parties should consider the effect of the
`
`stipulation on times to object to evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)), to supplement
`
`evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)), to conduct cross-examination (37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.53(d)(2)), and to draft papers depending on the evidence and cross-examination
`
`testimony (see Section B).
`
`
`
`The parties are reminded that the Testimony Guidelines appended to the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48772 (Aug. 14, 2012)
`
`(Appendix D), apply to this trial. The Board may impose an appropriate sanction
`
`for failure to adhere to the Testimony Guidelines. 37 C.F.R. § 42.12. For
`
`example, reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred by any party may be
`
`levied on a person who impedes, delays, or frustrates the fair examination of a
`
`witness.
`
`
`
`1. DUE DATE 1
`
`The patent owner may file—
`
`
`
`
`
`a. A response to the petition (37 C.F.R. § 42.120), and
`
`b. A motion to amend the patent (37 C.F.R. § 42.121).
`
`The patent owner must file any such response or motion to amend by DUE
`
`DATE 1. If the patent owner elects not to file anything, the patent owner must
`
`arrange a conference call with the parties and the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`2. DUE DATE 2
`
`The petitioner must file any reply to the patent owner’s response and
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00020
`Patent 8,058,897
`
`opposition to the motion to amend by DUE DATE 2.
`
`3. DUE DATE 3
`
`The patent owner must file any reply to the petitioner’s opposition to patent
`
`owner’s motion to amend by DUE DATE 3.
`
`
`
`4. DUE DATE 4
`
`a. The petitioner must file any motion for an observation on the cross-
`
`examination testimony of a reply witness (see Section C) by DUE DATE 4.
`
`b. Each party must file any motion to exclude evidence (37 C.F.R
`
`§ 42.64(c)) and any request for oral argument (37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)) by DUE
`
`DATE 4.
`
`
`
` 5. DUE DATE 5
`
`a. The patent owner must file any reply to a petitioner observation on cross-
`
`examination testimony by DUE DATE 5.
`
`b. Each party must file any opposition to a motion to exclude evidence by
`
`DUE DATE 5.
`
`
`
`6. DUE DATE 6
`
`Each party must file any reply for a motion to exclude evidence by DUE
`
`DATE 6.
`
`
`
`
`
`7. DUE DATE 7
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00020
`Patent 8,058,897
`
`
`
`The oral argument (if requested by either party) is set for DUE DATE 7.
`
`B. CROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`
`
`Except as the parties might otherwise agree, for each due date—
`
`1. Cross-examination begins after any supplemental evidence is due. 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 42.53(d)(2).
`
`2. Cross-examination ends no later than a week before the filing date for
`
`any paper in which the cross-examination testimony is expected to be used. Id.
`
`
`
`C. MOTION FOR OBSERVATION ON CROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`A motion for observation on cross-examination provides the petitioner with
`
`a mechanism to draw the Board’s attention to relevant cross-examination testimony
`
`of a reply witness, since no further substantive paper is permitted after the reply.
`
`See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14,
`
`2012). The observation must be a concise statement of the relevance of precisely
`
`identified testimony to a precisely identified argument or portion of an exhibit.
`
`Each observation should not exceed a single, short paragraph. The patent owner
`
`may respond to the observation. Any response must be equally concise and
`
`specific.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00020
`Patent 8,058,897
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1…………….…………………………………..May 13, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 2………………………………………….…..…..August 12, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner response to petition
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 3………………………………………............September 12, 2013
`
`
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4…………………………………………..October 3, 2013
`
`Petitioner’s motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply
`
`witness
`
`
`
`
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 5………………………………………..…October 17, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent owner’s response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6………………………………………………October 24, 2013
`
`
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 7…………………………..…………………November 7, 2013
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00020
`Patent 8,058,897
`
`cc:
`
`Petitioner:
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`Robert G. Sterne
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC
`Email: lgordon@skgf.com
`Email: rsterne@skgf.com
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`David M. O’Dell
`Thomas B. King
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`Email: david.odell@haynesboone.com
`Email: Thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`