`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 43
`
`Entered: October 30, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ARNOUSE DIGITAL DEVICES CORPORATION
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00010
`Patent 7,516,484
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37C.F.R. §42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00010
`Patent 7,516,484
`
`
`
`A conference call was held to discuss whether the Board should grant
`
`Petitioner’s request for final hearing. Patent Owner opposed the request.
`
`Specifically, Patent Owner represented that a hearing would place an undue
`
`financial burden on the Patent Owner, which is a small business. Patent Owner
`
`further represented that this particular case has been sufficiently briefed such that
`
`no hearing would be necessary for the Board to decide the merits of the case.
`
`
`
`The Board stated that 35 U.S.C. § 315(a)(10) required the Office promulgate
`
`rules providing either party with the right to an oral hearing as part of the
`
`proceeding. The Board agreed with Patent Owner, however, that this particular
`
`case has been briefed sufficiently such that no prejudice would arise should a
`
`hearing not be held. The Board requested that Petitioner consider whether such a
`
`hearing would be necessary and if one were to be conducted, the Board indicated
`
`that the hearing would be conducted telephonically to reduce the financial burden
`
`on Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Petitioner subsequently contacted the Board and withdrew its request for an
`
`oral hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It is:
`
`Ordered that no oral hearing will be held in the proceeding and that the case
`
`will be decided on the briefs in due course.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00010
`Patent 7,516,484
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Ko-Fang Chang
`kchang@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Justin McCabe
`jmccabe@dunkielsaunders.com
`
`Geoff Hand
`ghand@dunkielsaunders.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
