`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 39
`Entered: July 9, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`DYNAMIC DRINKWARE LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`NATIONAL GRAPHICS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013-00131
`Patent 6,635,196
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00131
`Patent 6,635,196
`
`The Scheduling Order for this case sets the date for oral hearing as
`
`July 24, 2014, if hearing is requested by the parties and granted by the
`
`Board. Both parties have requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.70. Petitioner’s and Patent Owner’s request for oral hearing is granted.
`
`
`
`Each side will have 60 minutes to present arguments. Petitioner bears
`
`the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s claims at issue in this
`
`review are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the hearing by
`
`presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for which the Board
`
`instituted trial. Patent Owner has filed a motion to amend the claims and
`
`bears the burden of proof with respect to that motion. After Petitioner’s
`
`presentation, therefore, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s argument
`
`and also argue in support of its motion to amend. Each side may reserve
`
`time to respond to arguments presented by the other side with some
`
`limitations. More specifically, to the extent that Petitioner reserves rebuttal
`
`time, it may respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters. To the
`
`extent that Patent Owner reserves rebuttal time, however, it may respond
`
`only to Petitioner’s arguments opposing the motion to amend.
`
`The hearing will commence at 10:00 PM on July 24, 2014, on the
`
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`
`Virginia. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`
`The parties are reminded that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a
`
`proponent of deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00131
`Patent 6,635,196
`
`The Board will not consider any deposition testimony that has not been so
`
`filed.
`
`Furthermore, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must
`
`be served at least five business days before the hearing date. The parties
`
`also shall provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the
`
`Board at least five business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`
`this proceeding without prior authorization from the Board.
`
`The parties must file any objections to the demonstratives with the
`
`Board at least two business days before the hearing. Any objection to
`
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`
`demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or
`
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`
`schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties are
`
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`
`demonstrative exhibits.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending
`
`the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00131
`Patent 6,635,196
`
`with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to
`
`discuss the matter.
`
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`
`unless presented in a separate communication not less than five days before
`
`the hearing directed to the above email address.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00131
`Patent 6,635,196
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph S. Heino
`Patrick M. Bergin
`DAVIS AND KUELTHAU, S.C.
`jheino@dkattorneys.com
`pbergin@dkattorneys.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael T. Griggs
`Keith M. Baxter
`Sarah Wong
`BOYLE FREDERICKSON, S.C.
`mtg@boylefred.com
`kmb@boylefred.com
`smw@boylefred.com
`
`5
`
`