throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____
`
`
`
`VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`CASE IPR: IPR2013-00150
`Patent 7,093,086
`_____________________
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop "PATENT BOARD"
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2013-00150
`U.S. Patent No. 7,093,086
`Petitioner, Veeam Software Corporation (“Veeam”), and Patent Owner,
`
`1
`
`Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”), have met and conferred, and stipulate to the
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`In IPR2013-00141, Veeam’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (paper 27)
`
`and Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend (paper 28) are
`
`considered to be timely filed.
`
`2.
`
`In IPR2013-00141, Symantec’s Declaration of John V. Levy (Exhibit
`
`2011) and Declaration of John V. Levy in support of Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion to Amend (Exhibit 2013) are considered properly filed despite
`
`lacking page numbers.
`
`3.
`
`In IPR2013-00141, Veeam’s Declaration of Prashant Shenoy in Response
`
`to Patent Owner’s Response (Exhibit 1013) is considered properly filed
`
`despite lacking page numbers.
`
`4.
`
`In IPR2013-00142, Veeam’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (paper 28)
`
`and Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend (paper 29) are
`
`considered to be timely filed.
`
`5.
`
`In IPR2013-00142, Symantec’s Declaration of John V. Levy (Exhibit
`
`2011) and Declaration of John V. Levy in support of Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion to Amend (Exhibit 2013) are considered properly filed despite
`
`lacking page numbers.
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2013-00150
`U.S. Patent No. 7,093,086
`In IPR2013-00142, Veeam’s Declaration of Prashant Shenoy in Response
`
`2
`
`6.
`
`to Patent Owner’s Response (Exhibit 1014) is considered properly filed
`
`despite lacking page numbers.
`
`7.
`
`In IPR2013-00143, Symantec’s Corrected Response to Petition (paper 23)
`
`and Corrected Motion to Amend (paper 24) are considered to be timely and
`
`properly filed replacements for Symantec’s Response to Petition (paper 19)
`
`and Motion to Amend (paper 20).
`
`8.
`
`In IPR2013-00143, the parties understand that Veeam Exhibits 1009 and
`
`1010 are duplicates of Symantec Exhibits 2004 and 2006. Any documents
`
`already submitted by Veeam citing Exhibit 1009 and/or 1010 will be
`
`considered by the parties to be cites to Exhibits 2004 and/or 2006.
`
`9.
`
`In IPR2013-00143, Symantec’s Declaration of John V. Levy in support of
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend (Exhibit 2003) and Declaration of John
`
`V. Levy in support of Patent Owner’s Response (Exhibit 2010) are
`
`considered properly filed despite lacking a page number on the signature
`
`page.
`
`10. In IPR2013-00143, Veeam’s Supplemental Declaration of Prashant
`
`Shenoy (Exhibit 1008) is considered properly filed despite lacking page
`
`numbers.
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2013-00150
`U.S. Patent No. 7,093,086
`11. In IPR2013-00150, Veeam agrees to accept the replacement of Exhibit C
`
`3
`
`to Symantec’s Declarations of Matthew D. Green (papers 2015 and 2016)
`
`which was also provided as Veeam Exhibit 1028.
`
`12. In IPR2013-00150, Symantec’s Exhibits A-C to the Declarations of
`
`Matthew D. Green (papers 2015 and 2016) are considered properly
`
`submitted despite not being submitted as separate exhibits.
`
`13. In IPR2013-00150, Symantec’s Exhibits 2022, 2023, and 2025 are
`
`considered to be timely filed.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`Registration No. 50,633
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
` /Joseph J. Richetti, Reg. No. 47,024/
`Joseph J. Richetti
`Registration No. 47,024
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 17, 2014
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`4
`
`IPR2013-00150
`U.S. Patent No. 7,093,086
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 17th day of April, 2014, the foregoing
`
`“JOINT STIPULATION” was served electronically via e-mail upon the following
`
`counsel for Patent Owner, Symantec, Inc.:
`
`Joseph J. Richetti, Reg. No. 47,024
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`
`
`Daniel Crowe, Reg. No. 39,644
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`One Metropolitan Square
`211 North Broadway, Suite 3600
`St. Louis, MO 63102-2750
`dacrowe@bryancave.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Lori A. Gordon
`Date: April 17, 2014
` Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Registration No. 50,633
`Washington, D.C.20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket