throbber
Jon Strang
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Bill R. Miras
`Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:19 PM
`'joe.richetti@bryancave.com'; 'lgkurland@bryancave.com'
`Lori Gordon; Mike Lee; Byron Pickard
`IPR2013-00150: Service of Supplemental Evidence
`Certificate of Service IPR2013-00150.pdf
`
`Counsel:(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)W
`
`e(cid:3)are(cid:3)electronically(cid:3)serving(cid:3)Petitioner(cid:3)Veeam's(cid:3)supplemental(cid:3)evidence,(cid:3)which(cid:3)is(cid:3)immediately(cid:3)available(cid:3)via(cid:3)this(cid:3)link(cid:3)
`(https://www.hightail.com/download/OGhmTkFuT2JGR0dybHNUQw).(cid:3)Because(cid:3)this(cid:3)evidence(cid:3)(over(cid:3)2(cid:3)gigabytes)(cid:3)exceeds(cid:3)
`the(cid:3)size(cid:3)limitations(cid:3)of(cid:3)our(cid:3)mail(cid:3)system(cid:3)we(cid:3)are(cid:3)unable(cid:3)to(cid:3)transmit(cid:3)it(cid:3)via(cid:3)email.(cid:3)(cid:3)If(cid:3)you(cid:3)have(cid:3)any(cid:3)problems(cid:3)with(cid:3)this(cid:3)
`transmittal,(cid:3)please(cid:3)let(cid:3)us(cid:3)know(cid:3)immediately.(cid:3)(cid:3)
`
`ill(cid:3)Miras(cid:3)|Litigation(cid:3)Paralegal(cid:3)|Sterne,(cid:3)Kessler,(cid:3)Goldstein(cid:3)and(cid:3)Fox(cid:3)P.L.L.C.|(cid:3)1100(cid:3)New(cid:3)York(cid:3)Avenue(cid:3)NW,(cid:3)Suite(cid:3)800(cid:3)Washington,(cid:3)DC(cid:3)
`20005|(cid:3)
`Email:(cid:3)bmiras@skgf.com(cid:3)|Direct:(cid:3)202.772.8778|Main:(cid:3)202.371.2600|(cid:3)(cid:3)Secretary(cid:3)(cid:882)(cid:3)Cecilia(cid:3)Zhang:(cid:3)202.772.8682|(cid:3)
`http://www.skgf.com/home.php(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`
`1
`0001
`
`VEEAM 1015
`Veeam v. Symantec
`IPR2013-00150
`
`(cid:3)T
`
`hanks,(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:3)B
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013—00150
`
`Patent 7,093,086
`
`SERVICE
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`
`0002
`0002
`
`

`
`Pursuarat to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2), Petitioner Veeam Software Corporation
`
`(“Veeam”) hereby serves electronically the following supplemental evidence in
`
`response to the objection served by Patent Owner on August 21, 2013. This
`
`evidence is being served within ten business days of the service of the objection.
`
`1. Declaration of Daniel S. Block including:
`
`Exhibit A: Photographs of the VMware ESX 1.0 media kit, including its
`packaging and contents.
`
`Exhibit B: Photographs of the VMware Workstation 2.0 for Linux Systems
`media kit including its packaging and contents.
`
`Exhibit C: August 26, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager
`at Internet Archive.
`
`Exhibit D: July 15, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager at
`Internet Archive.
`
`Exhibit E: August 29, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager
`at Internet Archive.
`
`Exhibit F: Image of VMware ESX Server 1.0.1 included with VMware ESX
`1.0 media kit.
`
`Exhibit G: Image of VMware ESX Server 1.0.1d included with VMware
`ESX 1.0 media kit.
`
`Exhibit H: Image of VMware Workstation for Linux Systems Version 2.0
`included with VMware Workstation 2.0 media kit.
`
`2. June 7, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager at Internet
`Archive including Exhibits A, B, and C.
`
`3. July 15, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager at Internet
`Archive including Exhibit A.
`
`0003
`0003
`
`

`
`4. August 26, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager at Internet
`Archive including Exhibit A.
`
`5. August 29, 2013 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager at Internet
`Archive including Exhibit A.
`
`6. September 4, 2013 Declaration of Tom Sightler including:
`
`Exhibit A: A copy of Veeam 1006 IPR of U.S. Patent No. 7,093,086.
`
`7. VMware 2 for Linux by Jason Compton, Frirna Publishing {2000), ISBN: 0-
`7615-2764-8.
`
`8. Image of CD included with VMware 2 for Linux by Jason Compton, ISBN:
`0-7615-2764-8 including gettingstarted_2_linux.pdf dated July 12, 2000.
`
`9. United States Copyright Office, Copy of Assignment, Certificate of
`Recordation dated March 6, 2002 for VMware 2 for Linux by Jason
`Compton published on August 24, 2000.
`
`10.United States Copyright Office, Copy of Assignment dated March 6, 2002
`for VMware 2 for Linux, ISBN 0-7615-2754-8.
`
`11.Declaration by Dr. Prashant Shenoy including:
`
`Exhibit 1: Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager at Internet
`Archive including Exhibits A, B, and C.
`
`Exhibit 2: A copy of the recovered version of PDF file in Exhibit 1 obtained
`from Internet Archive.
`
`Exhibit 3: A copy of the native version of VEEAM_1 006 previously
`submitted in the above captioned matter.
`
`Exhibit 4: A copy of Adobe Systems Inc., PDF REFERENCE (3d 2001).
`
`12.IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol. 2001, No. 79, ISSN 0919-6072, by
`Information Processing Society of Japan Inc., dated August 10, 2001
`(Japanese).
`
`0004
`0004
`
`

`
`13.English Translation of cover page, table of contents, and “Checkpoint for
`Network Transferable Computer” included in IPSJ SIG Technical Report
`Vol. 2001, No. 79, ISSN 0919-6072.
`
`14.Certif1cation that the English Translation of cover page, table of contents,
`and “Checkpoint for Network Transferable Computer” included in IPSJ SIG
`Technical Report Vol. 2001, No. 79, ISSN 0919-6072 is true and accurate.
`
`15.A copy of DIGEST OF PAPERS: TWENTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL
`SYMPOSIUM ON FAULT-TOLERANT COMPUTING (1997) including “Integrating
`Checkpointing with Transaction Processing” by Wang et al.
`
`Upon request, Veeam will make its copy of VMware 2 for Linux by Jason
`
`Compton, Prima Publishing (2000), ISBN: 0-7615-2764-8 including the CD
`
`available for inspection.
`
`Veeam notes that Patent Owner’s objection to VEEAM 1004 and its hearsay
`
`objections to VEEM 1005, VEEAM 1012, VEEAM 1006, VEEAM 1007-1009,
`
`and
`
`1010 fail to “identify the grounds for the Objection with sufficient
`
`particularity to allow correction in the form of supplemental evidence” as required
`
`by 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1). Veeam therefore reserves the right to further
`
`supplement its evidence should Patent Owner provide sufficient detail to permit
`
`Veeam to respond with supplemental evidence.
`
`0005
`0005
`
`

`
` DATE: September 5, 2013 By:
`
`_4_ 4‘
`. Gordon, Lead Counsel (Reg. No. 50,633)
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`1 100 New York Avenue, NW
`
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Veeam Software Corporation
`
`0006
`0006
`
`

`
`IPR20l3-00150
`
`Patent 7,093,086
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of September, 2013, a true and correct
`
`copy of the foregoing SERVICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE including the
`
`listed evidence was served electronically upon the following counsel for Patent
`
`Owner, Symantec, Inc.
`
`Joseph J. Richetti, Lead Counsel
`Lawrence G. Kurland, Backup Counsel
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`
`New York, NY 10104
`
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`lgkurland@bryancave.com
`
` . Gordon, Lead Counsel (Reg. No. 50,633)
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`l 100 New York Avenue, NW
`
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Veeam Software Corporation
`
`0007
`0007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket