throbber
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll||H||l|lH|||l|||||||
`USO05270l 84A
`5,270,184
`[11] Patent Number:
`United States Patent
`Walker et al.
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Dec. 14, 1993
`
`
`[191
`
`[54] NUCLEIC ACID TARGET GENERA-non
`
`wo9o/14439 11/1990 pcr lnt‘l Appl.
`
`..................... 435/6
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: George T. Walker, Chapel Hill;
`Michael C. Little, Raleigh; James G.
`Nfleau, Durham’ an of NC.
`
`[73] Assignee: Becton, Dickinson and Company,
`Franklin Lakes. N-I
`[21] APPL N0-1 794,399
`[22] Filed:
`No“ 19, 1991
`
`Int. c1.s ............................................ .. C12P 19/34
`[51]
`[52] U.S. CL ................................. 435/91.2; 435/91.21
`Of Search ......................... 435/6.91;
`435/501» 94
`
`[55]
`
`References Cited
`US‘ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,683,195
`7/1987 Mullis et al.
`............................ 435/6
`5,106,727 4/1992 Hartley ................................... 435/6
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0200362 12/1986 European Pat’ O0-_ .
`0395398 10/1990 European Pat. Off.
`.
`0497272
`8/1992 European Pat. Off.
`.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Maniatis et al., Molecular Cloning a Lab Manual, Cold
`Spring Harbor Lab., 1992, pp. 109, M4.
`John C. Guatelli ct al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1990)
`Deborah Y. Kwoh et al., ABL (Oct. 1990) p. 14.
`Primary Examiner——Stephanie W. Zitomer
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Donna R. Fugit
`
`ABSTRACT
`[571
`The invention is a method for generating nucleic acid
`scquencgs ends
`comprisgs;
`(a) hybridizing a primer to a nucleic acid sequence,
`(b) hybridizing a primer to the nucleic acid sequence
`in (a) located 5’ to the primer in (a), and
`(c) polymerizing both primers so that the primer in
`(3) is displaced from the nucleic acid sequence,
`The invention provides a method for generating target
`nucleic acid sequences for subsequent amplification.
`The method 15 applicable to both DNA and RNA.
`
`7 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`5' S1
`0.‘,T
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`5' T2
`
`
`9
`
`POLYMERIZE USING S2
`dGTP, dCTP, TTP AND
`dATP(ocS)
`
`1
`
`5
`
`
`
`POLYMERIZE AND
`
`DISPLACE STRAND
`
`HYBRIDIZE SDA PRIMERS T0 DISPLACED STRANDS
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 1
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 1
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 14,1993
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`5,270,184
`
`F l G _ 1
`
`DENATURE TARGET
`BIND PRIMERS
`T
`2
`.
`
`
`
`
`—\T5’
`S2
`2
`51
`5'E‘..\_ TI
`
`
`_
`
`_
`
`PRIMER EXTENSION AND_
`DISPLACEMENT av Exo
`
`I<LENow
`
`
`
`O O I
`
`S
`\‘
`
`S2-EXT $2\
`S1—EXT
`
`0 I O
`
`B1
`
`
`
`5
`e,\ 1
`
`. '51
`
`3,
`
`BIND OPPOSITE PRIMERS
`TO S1—EXT AND S2—EXT
`
`S2-EXT 52\
`S1-EXT
`
`B2
`S2
`PRIMER EXTENSION AND
`DISPLACEMENT av Exo'
`KLENOW
`
`BINDING or OPPOSITE
`RRINERS
`
`EXTENSION av Exo”
`KLENOW
`
`51
`
`32 \‘
`
`\ 1
`
`2
`
`52
`
`¢sDA
`
`T0 FIG-2
`
`Ariosa Exhib_it 1018, pg. 2
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 2
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 14, 1993
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`5,270,184
`
`FIG-2
`
`T2
`5’
`5’ S1
`
`
`
`s
`
`5‘ POLYMERIZE USING 32
`
`dGTP, dCTP, TTP AND
`dATP(°<S)
`
`
`5!
`
` T
`
`A
`
`
`
`$ mcx wnn HINC n
`
`
`
`j
`
`
`POLYMERIZE AND
`DISPLACE STRAND
`
`
`
`N
`4
`
`Un-f'§___-f
`
`
`
`HYBRIDIZE SDA PRIMERS TO DISPLACED STRANDS
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 3
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 3
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 14, 1993
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`5,270,184
`
`FIG-3
`
`5'
`— -G—T—T—G—A—C-
`
`PRIMER
`
`TARGT POLYMERIZE USING
`
`dCTP, dGTP, TTP AND
`dATP(oc$)
`
`5
`
`$ NICK WITH HINC u
`
`— —G-T —T-G—A-C-
`— -C-AsAsC—T—G-
`
`— -G—T-T1G-A—C-
`
`- -C—AsAsC-T-G-
`

`
`Gm
`
`POLYMERIZE AND
`DISPLACE STRAND
`\c
`
`— -G—T—T-GsA-C-
`— -C-AsAsC—T—G—
`
`—. —G—T—T1GsA—C-
`
`— -C-AsAsC—T—G—
`
`‘ NICK wnn HINC n
`

`
`51,4
`
`~c\
`
`POLYMERIZE AND
`
`DISPLACE STRAND
`
`
`
`— —G—T-T—GsA—C—
`-—- —C-AsAsC—T—G-
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 4
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 4
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 14, 1993
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`5,270,184
`
`FIG-4
`
`TARGET RESTRICTION FRAGMENT
`
`5.
`
`P1
`
`T
`
`,2
`
`T
`
`‘
`
`T
`
`RESTRICT/DENATURE
`HYBRIDIZE AMPLIFICATION
`PROBES
`
`5'
`
`
`
`POLYMERIZE AND
`DISPLACE STRAND
`
`HYBRIDIZE AMPLIFICATTON PROBES TO DISPLACED STRANDS
`
`Ariosa Exhib_it 1018, pg. 5
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`
`
`P2
`
`POLYMERIZE
`WITH dNTP(°<S)
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 5
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`1
`
`5,270,184
`
`NUCLEIC ACID TARGET GENERATION
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to a method for preparing a
`target nucleic acid prior to amplification.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Nucleic acids may be either in the form of deoxyribo-
`nucleic acids (DNA) or in the form of ribonucleic acids
`(RNA). DNA and RNA are high molecular weight
`polymers
`formed from many nucleotide building
`blocks. Each nucleotide is composed of a base (a purine
`or a pyrimidine), a sugar (either ribose or deoxyribose)
`and a molecule of phosphoric acid. DNA is composed
`of the sugar deoxyribose and the bases adenine (A),
`guanine (G), cytosine (C) and thymine (T).
`The nucleotides are assembled into a linear chain to
`form the genetic code. Each sequence of three nucleo-
`tides can be “read” as the code for one amino acid
`through the process of translation (DNA must first be
`converted into RNA through the process of transcrip-
`tion). By varying the combination of bases in each three
`base sequence, different amino acids are coded for. By
`linking various three base sequences together, a se-
`quence of amino acids can be made which forms prote-
`ins and polypeptides. The entire coding unit for one
`protein is referred to as a gene. There can be one or
`more copies of a gene in an organism. Some genes are
`present in hundreds or thousands of copies, others are
`present only as a single copy.
`Regardless of the number of copies, genes are linked
`together in an organism to form higher structural units
`referred to as chromosomes in higher organisms. In
`some lower organisms, genes may occur in extra chro-
`mosomal units referred to as plasmids. Genes need not
`be linked directly to each other in an end—to-end fash-
`ion. Certain non coding regions (i.e., introns: sequences
`of bases that do not translate into amino acids) may
`occur between genes or within a gene. The arrangement
`of nucleotides in an organism determines its genetic
`makeup which may be referred to as its genome (hence,
`DNA isolated from an organism is referred to as geno-
`mic DNA).
`DNA in most organisms is arranged in the form of a
`duplex wherein two strands of DNA are paired to-
`gether in the familiar double helix. In this model, hydro-
`gen bonds are formed between A and T and between C
`and G on the paired strands. Thus, on one strand, the
`sequence ATCG (5’—-3') will have on its complemen-
`tary strand the sequence TAGC (3’—>5’). Both strands,
`however, contain the same genetic code only in a com-
`plementary base-paired manner. One could read, there-
`fore, either strand of DNA in order to determine the
`genetic sequence coded for.
`For a further description of the organization, struc-
`ture and function of nucleic acids, see Watson, Molecu-
`lar Biology of the Gene, W. J. Benjamin, Inc. (3rd edit.
`1976), especially Chapters 6-14.
`Understanding and determining the genetic sequence
`of nucleic acids present in a sample is important for
`many reasons. First, a number of diseases are genetic in
`the sense that the nucleotide sequence for a “normal"
`gene is in some manner changed. Such a change could
`arise by the substitution of one base for another. Given
`that three bases code for a single amino acid, a change
`in one base (referred to as a point mutation) could result
`in a change in the amino acid which,
`in turn, could
`
`5
`
`l0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`result in a defective protein being made in a cell. Sickle
`cell anemia is a classic example of such a genetic defect
`caused by a change in a single base in a single gene.
`Other examples of diseases caused by single gene de-
`fects include Factor IX and Factor VIII deficiency,
`adenosine deaminase deficiency, purine nucleotide
`phosphorylase deficiency, omithine transcarbamylase
`deficiency, argininsuccinate synthetase deficiency, beta-
`thalassemia, a1 antitrypsin deficiency, glucocerebrosi-
`dase deficiency, phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency
`and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase
`deficiency. Still other diseases, such as cancers, are
`believed to be caused by the activation, increase in copy
`number and/or removal of suppression of genes known
`to be present in the genome (referred to as oncogenes).
`Examples of oncogenes believed to be relevant to cer-
`tain cancers include N myc for neuroblastomas, retino-
`blastomas and small cell
`lung cancers and c-abl for
`chronic myelogenous leukemia. For a further descrip-
`tion of the relevance of oncogenes to the diagnosis of
`cancers and for a listing of specific oncogenes, see
`Weinberg, Sci. Amer., Nov. 1983, Slamon et al., Sci-
`ence, 224:256 (1984), U.S Pat. No. 4,699,877 and
`4,918,162.
`Second, in addition to changes in the sequence of
`nucleic acids, there are genetic changes that occur on a
`structural level. Such changes include insertions, dele-
`tions and translocations along a chromosome and in-
`clude increased or decreased numbers of chromosomes.
`In the former instance, such changes can result from
`events referred to as crossing over where strands of
`DNA from one chromosome exchange various lengths
`of DNA with another chromosome. Thus, for example,
`in a “normal” individual,
`the gene for protein “X”
`might reside on chromosome 1; after a crossing over
`event, that gene could now have been translocated to
`chromosome 4 (with or without an equal exchange of
`DNA from chromosome 4 to chromosome 1) and the
`individual may not produce X.
`In the instance of increased or decreased chromo-
`some number (referred to as aneuploidy), instead of a
`“normal” individual having the correct number of cop-
`ies of each chromosome (e.g., two of each in humans
`[other than the X and Y chromosomes]), a different
`number occurs. In humans, for example, Down’s syn-
`drome is the result of having three copies of chromo-
`some 2l instead of the normal two copies. Other aneu-
`ploid conditions result from trisomies involving chro-
`mosomes l3 and 18.
`
`Third, infectious diseases can be caused by parasites,
`microorganisms and viruses all of which have their own
`nucleic acids. The presence of these organisms in a
`sample of biological material often is determined by a
`number of traditional methods (e.g., culture). Because
`each organism has its own genome, however, if there
`are genes or sequences of nucleic acids that are specific
`to a single species (to several related species, to a genus
`or to a higher level of relationship), the genome will
`provide a “fingerprint” for that organism (or species,
`etc.). Examples of viruses to which this invention is
`applicable include HIV, HPV, EBV, HSV, Hepatitis B
`and C and CMV. Examples of microorganisms to which
`this invention is applicable include bacteria and more
`particularly include H.
`influenzae, mycoplasma,
`le-
`gionella, mycobacteria, chlamydia, candida, gonocci,
`shigella and salmonella.
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 6
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 6
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`5,270,184
`
`3
`In each example set forth above, by identifying one or
`more sequences that are specific for a diseases or organ-
`ism, one can isolate nucleic acids from a sample and
`determine if that sequence is present. A number of
`methods have been developed in an attempt to do this.
`While it is critical that one or more sequences specific
`for a disease or organism be identified, it is not impor-
`tant to the practice of this invention what the target
`sequences are or how they are identified. The most
`straightforward means to detect the presence of a target
`sequence in a sample of nucleic acids is to synthesize a
`probe sequence complementary to the target nucleic
`acid (instrumentation, such as the Applied BioSystems
`380B,
`is presently used to synthesize nucleic acid se-
`quences for this purpose). The synthesized probe se-
`quence then can be applied to a sample containing nu-
`cleic acids and, if the target sequence is present, the
`probe will bind to it to form a reaction product. In the
`absence of a target sequence and barring non specific
`binding, no reaction product will be formed. If the
`synthesized probe is tagged with a detectable label, the
`reaction product can be detected by measuring the
`amount of label present Southern blotting is one exam-
`ple where this method is used.
`A difficulty with this approach, however, is that it is
`not readily applicable to those instances where the num-
`ber of copies of the target sequence present in a sample
`is low (i.e., less than 107). In such instances, it is difficult
`to distinguish signal from noise (i.e., true binding be-
`tween probe and target sequences from non specific
`binding between probe and non target sequences). One
`way around this problem is to increase the signal Ac-
`cordingly, a number of methods have been described to
`amplify the target sequences present in a sample.
`One of the best known amplification methods is the
`polymerase chain reaction (referred to as PCR) which is
`described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195, 4,683,202
`and 4,800,159. Briefly, in PCR, two primer sequences
`are prepared which are complementary to regions on
`opposite complementary strands of the target sequence.
`An excess of deoxynucleoside triphosphates are added
`to a reaction mixture along with a DNA polymerase
`(e.g., Taq polymerase). If the target sequence is present
`in a sample, the primers will bind to the target and the
`polymerase will cause the primers to be extended along
`the target sequence by adding on nucleotides. By raising
`and lowering the temperature of the reaction mixture,
`the extended primers will dissociate from the target to
`form reaction products, excess primers will bind to the
`target and to the reaction products and the process is
`repeated.
`Another method for amplification is described in
`EPA No. 320,308, published Jun. 14, 1989, which is the
`ligase chain reaction (referred to as LCR). In LCR, two
`complementary probe pairs are prepared, and in the
`presence of the target sequence, each pair will bind to
`opposite complementary strands of the target such that
`they abut. In the presence of a ligase, the two probe
`pairs will link to form a single unit. By temperature
`cycling, as in PCR, bound ligated units dissociate from
`the target and then serve as “target sequences" for liga-
`tion of excess probe pairs. U.S. Pat. No. 4,883,750 de-
`scribes a method similar to LCR for binding probe pairs
`to a target sequence but does not describe an amplifica-
`tion step.
`A still further amplification method is described in
`PCT Appl. No. PCT/US87/00880, published Oct. 22,
`1987, and is referred to as the Qbeta Replicase method.‘
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4
`In this method, a replicative sequence of RNA which
`has a region complementary to that of a target is added
`to a sample in the presence of an RNA polymerase. The
`polymerase will copy the replicative sequence which
`can then be detected.
`
`Still other amplification methods are described in GB
`Appl. No. 2 202 328, published Sep. 21, 1988, and in
`PCT Appl. No. PCT/US89/01025, published Oct. 5,
`1989. In the former application, “modified” primers are
`used in a PCR like, template and enzyme dependent
`synthesis. The primers may be modified by labelling
`with a capture moiety (e.g., biotin) and/or a detector
`moiety (e.g., enzyme). In the latter application, an ex-
`cess of labelled probes are added to a sample. In the
`presence of the target sequence, the probe binds and is
`cleaved catalytically. After cleavage,
`the target se-
`quence is released intact to be bound by excess probe.
`Cleavage of the labelled probe signals the presence of
`the target sequence. And finally U.S. patent application
`Ser. No. 07/648,257 filed Jan. 31, 1991 discloses and
`claims a method for amplifying nucleic acid (referred to
`as strand displacement amplification) which comprises
`target generation prior to amplification in which restric-
`tion enzymes are employed.
`Each of the above referenced amplification methods
`benefit from access to the desired nucleic acid sequence
`to be amplified. In addition, the need to generate am-
`plifiable target fragments with defined 5’- and 3‘-ends
`(i.e., ending at specific nucleotide positions) is a contin-
`ually sought after goal.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention is a method for generating nucleic acid
`sequences which comprises;
`(a) hybridizing a primer to a nucleic acid sequence,
`(b) hybridizing a primer to the nucleic acid sequence
`in (a) located 5’ to the primer in (a), and
`(c) polymerizing both primers so that the primer in
`(a) is displaced from the nucleic acid sequence.
`The invention provides a method for generating tar-
`get nucleic acid sequences with defined 5’- and 3’-ends
`for subsequent amplification and cloning. The method is
`applicable to both DNA and RNA.
`In addition, the method can employ a heat step after
`(c), above, and repeat over and over.
`When the target fragments comprise double stranded
`nucleic acids, the method further comprises denaturing
`the nucleic acid fragments to form single stranded tar-
`get sequences only once. Where the nucleic acids com-
`prise RNA, it is preferable to use reverse transcriptase
`to convert RNA to DNA.
`
`Subsequent strand displacement amplification (SDA)
`is enhanced because a larger number of modified nick-
`ing sites are generated from each original target strand.
`The previously described SDA method involved target
`restriction prior to binding primers and produced only
`two double stranded fragments with a modified nicking
`site at just one end. The restriction step was necessary
`to provide target fragments with defined 5’-and 3’-ends.
`Subsequent binding of the SDA primers to the 3’-ends
`of these target fragments and subsequent extension by
`an exonuclease deficient form of klenow (exo—k1enow)
`provided nicking enzyme recognition sites from which
`SDA initiated. The current target generation method
`produces four double stranded fragments with a total of
`six modified nicking sites (see FIG. 1). In addition,
`target sequences can now be chosen without regard for
`convenient flanking restriction sites. Finally, SDA can
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 7
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 7
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`5
`now be applied to either double or single stranded tar-
`get DNA target samples. Previously, targets had to be
`double stranded for cleavage by the restriction en-
`zyme(s). As used in this document, “nicking” refers to
`preferential cleavage of one of two strands present in a
`double-stranded recognition site.
`The invention further relates to methods for the sepa-
`ration and/or detection of amplified products generated
`by the invention. Methods for separation of amplified
`products comprise magnetic separation, membrane cap-
`ture and capture on solid supports. In each method, a
`capture moiety may be bound to a magnetic bead, mem-
`brane or solid support. The beads, membrane or solid
`support then can be assayed for the presence or absence
`of amplified products. An example of a capture moiety
`includes a nucleic sequence complementary to the am-
`plified products produced and an antibody directed
`against a receptor incorporated into the primer or am-
`plified product. The separation system may or may not
`be coupled to a detection system.
`The invention further relates to methods of generat-
`ing amplified products which can function as probes or
`templates for sequence analysis. In this format,
`the
`above described method and steps are used to generate
`amplified products. The amplified products can then be
`treated to remove the nicking enzyme recognition se-
`quence from the amplified product, for example by
`using a restriction enzyme. In this manner, the recogni-
`tion sequence is removed and the remaining amplified
`product comprises a probe which can he used in other
`systems.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
`
`FIG. 1 Target generation scheme for strand displace-
`ment amplification. This figure depicts the initial steps
`which transform the original
`target sequence into
`“steady state" amplification as depicted in FIG. 2. A
`target DNA sample is heat denatured. Four primers
`(B1, B2, S1 and S2), present in excess, bind the target
`strands at positions flanking the sequence to be ampli-
`lied. Primers S1 and S2 have Hincll recognition sequen-
`ces at their 5'-ends. The four primers are simultaneously
`extended by exo‘ klenow using dGTP, dCTP, TTP
`and dATP(aS). Extension of B1 displaces the extension
`product from primer S1 (S1-ext). Likewise, extension of
`B2 displaces the S2 extension product, S2-ext. B2 and S2
`bind to displaced S1-ext. B1 and S1 bind to displaced
`S2-ext. Extension and displacement reactions on tem-
`plates S1-ext and S2-ext produce two fragments with a
`hemiphosphorothioate HincII site at each end and two
`longer fragments with a hemiohosphorothioate Hincll
`site at just one end. Hincll nicking and exo‘ klenow
`extension/displacement reactions initiate at these four
`fragments, quickly reaching the “steady state” set of
`reactions depicted in FIG. 2. Sense and antisense DNA
`strands are differentiated by thin and thick lines. Hincll
`recognition sequences are depicted by raised portions
`on the lines.
`FIG. 2 The “steady-state” series of strand displace-
`ment amplification (SDA) reactions. The following
`reaction steps continuously cycle during the course of
`amplification. Present in excess are two SDA primers
`(S1 and S2). The 3’-end of S1 binds to the 3'-end of a
`displaced strand serving as target (T1), forming a duplex
`with 5'-overhangs. Likewise, S2 binds to the displaced
`strand, T2. The 5’-overhangs of S1 and 52 contain a
`recognition sequence (5’GTTGAC3') for the restriction
`enzyme Hincll. Exo‘ klenow extends the 3’-ends of the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,270,184
`
`6
`duplexes using dGTP, CCTP, TTP and dATP(aS),
`which produces hemiphosphorothioate recognition
`sites on S1T1 and S2T2. Hincll nicks the unprotected
`primer strands of the hemiphosphorothioate recogni-
`tion sites, leaving intact the modified complementary
`strands. Exo‘ klenow extends the 3'-end at the nick on
`S1T1 and displaces the downstream strand that is func-
`tionally equivalent to T2. Likewise, extension at the
`nick on S2T2 results in displacement of a downstream
`strand functionally equivalent to T1. Nicking and poly-
`merization/displacement steps cycle continuously on
`S1T1 and S2T2 because extension at a nick regenerates a
`nickable HincII site. Target amplification is exponential
`because strands displaced from S1T1 serve as target for
`S2 while strands displaced from S2T2 serve as target for
`S1. Sense and antisense DNA strands are differentiated
`by thin and thick lines. I-Iincll recognition sequences
`are depicted by raised portions on the lines. The partial
`HincII recognition sequences 5’GAC and its comple-
`ment 5’GTC are present at the 5‘- and 3’-ends of dis-
`placed strands, respectively, as represented by small
`boxes.
`
`FIG. 3 Schematic showing steps of strand displace-
`ment amplification (SDA) using only one SDA primer
`which produces linear amplification.
`FIG. 4 Schematic showing steps of strand displace-
`ment amplification (SDA) using two SDA primers and
`a restriction digestion step for target generation (com-
`pared to the present invention target generation) prior
`to SDA. Use of two SDA primers (as opposed to one
`SDA primer) produces exponential amplification.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`To practice this invention, a sample may be isolated
`from any material suspected of containing the target
`nucleic acid sequence. For animals, preferably, mam-
`mals, and more preferably humans, the sources of such
`materials may comprise blood, bone marrow, lymph,
`hard tissues (e.g.,
`liver, spleen, kidney,
`lung, ovary,
`etc.), sputum, feces and urine. Other sources of material
`may be derived from plants, soil and other materials
`suspected of containing biological organisms.
`The isolation of nucleic acids from these materials
`can be done any number of ways. Such methods include
`the use of detergent lysates, sonication, vortexing with
`glass beads and a French press. In some instances, it
`may be advantageous to purify the nucleic acids isolated
`(e.g., where endogenous nucleases are present). In those
`instances, purification of the nucleic acids may be ac-
`complished by phenol extraction, chromatography, ion
`exchange, gel electrophoresis or density dependent
`centrifugation.
`Once the nucleic acids are isolated, it will be assumed
`for purposes of illustration herein only that the genomic
`nucleic acid is DNA and is double stranded.
`To begin target generation according to this inven-
`tion for subsequent SDA, the nucleic acid to be ampli-
`fied (e.g., target) is heat denatured in the presence of an
`excess of 4 primers (FIG. 1). Two primers (S1 and S2)
`are typical SDA primers, with target binding regions at
`their 3’-ends and nicking enzyme recognition sequences
`located 5‘-
`to the target complementary sequences.
`(Two SDA primers (S1 and S2) are necessary for expo-
`nential amplification, only one SDA primer (S1 or 52) is
`necessary for linear amplification. The other two prim-
`ers (B1 and B2) consist simply of target binding regions.
`(Only one upstream primer, B1 or B2, is absolutely nec-
`essary). S1 and S2 bind to opposite strands of the target
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 8
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 8
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`5,270,184
`
`8
`
`7
`at positions flanking the sequence to be amplified. B1
`and B2 bind upstream of S1 and S2, respectively. Exo-
`klenow simultaneously extends all 4 primers using 3
`deoxynucleoside triphosphates and one modified deox-
`ynucleoside triphosphates. Extension of S1 and S2 forms
`two products, S1-ext and S2-ext. Extension of B1 and B2
`results in displacement of S1-ext and S2-ext from the
`original target templates. Displaced and single-stranded
`S1-ext serves as target for S2 and B2. Likewise, displaced
`S2 ext is target for S1 and B1. All four primers are ex-
`tended on templates S1-ext and S2-ext. Combined exten-
`sion and displacement steps produce 2 double-stranded
`fragments with modified nicking enzyme recognition
`sites located at each end and two longer double-
`stranded fragments with modified recognition sites at
`only one end. Although the method has been described
`in steps,
`the method actually occurs simultaneously.
`Amplification can now proceed by the strand displace-
`ment amplification (SDA) procedure described below
`and described also in U.S. patent application Ser. No.
`07/648,257, incorporated herein by reference.
`The invention eliminates the conventional restriction
`step prior to binding primers. Thus workflow and costs
`are reduced in addition to simplifying target choice of
`sequences by the elimination of the need to locate target
`sequences flanked by convenient restriction sites. Also,
`the invention demonstrates increased sensitivity, pro-
`vides more freedom in choosing target nucleic acid
`sequences for amplification, and shortens time involved
`in amplification.
`This method for target generation can work with
`other amplification procedures such as polymerase
`chain reaction (PCR), PCR Technology, H. A. Erlich,
`Ed. (Stockton Press, New York, N.Y., 1989), transcrip-
`tion-based amplification system (TAS), Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 86:ll73 (1989), ligation amplification
`reaction (LAR), Genomic: 4:560 (1989),
`ligase based
`amplification system (LAS), Gene 89:11? (1990), and Q.
`B. replicase, Lomell et al., Clin. Chem. 35:1826 (1989),
`and 3SR, J. Guatelli et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`87:l874 (1990).
`If the target generation method of this invention is
`employed with amplification methods other than SDA,
`then several modifications can be made. There is no
`need for primers to contain any recognition sequences if
`subsequent amplification is by polymerase chain reac-
`tion. Likewise, if amplification is by Q beta replicase,
`then the recognition sequence should contain an RNA
`polymerase promotor for transcription of an RNA se-
`quence recognized by Q beta replicase (F. R. Kramer et
`al., Nature 3:39:40] (1989). If 3SR is used to amplify the
`DNA then primers S1 and/or S2 would contain RNA
`polymerase promoter sites. If amplification is to pro-
`ceed using a phi29 replication system (see Genentech
`W0 90/ 10064) then S1 and S2 would contain origin of
`replication sequences.
`In addition, the method can be practiced by essen-
`tially repeating FIG. 1 over and over. Heat is generally
`applied to denature the double stranded fragments.
`Such a method would eliminate the need for nicking
`enzymes and eliminate the need for modified nucleo-
`sides. Thus the methods essentially becomes an amplifi-
`cation method.
`Following target generation according to the scheme
`in FIG. 1, the target nucleic acid sequence can now be
`amplified by SDA using HincII as the amplification
`nicking enzyme. The four target fragments at the end of
`FIG. I automatically enter a “steady state" series of
`
`amplification cycles where Hincll nicks the hemiphos-
`phorothioate recognition site, and exo‘ klenow extends
`the 3’-end at the nick while displacing the downstream
`strand that serves as target for the opposite SDA primer
`(FIG. 2). These steps continuously repeat over the
`course of amplification. For example, 107-fold amplifi-
`cation theoretically derives from ~23 repetitions or
`cycles of the steps in FIG. 2 (223: 107). Each displaced
`strand in FIG. 2 contains the sequence 5'GAC at the
`5'-end and the complement 5'GTC at the 3'-end. 5'GAC
`is the portion of the HincII recognition sequence lo-
`cated 3' to the nick site.
`The transition between FIGS. 1 and 2 may become
`clearer with a detailed account for the last double
`stranded fragment at the bottom of FIG. 1. If Hincll
`nicks the hemiphosphorothioate site on the left end of
`the fragment containing the S1 primer sequence, exo-
`- klenow initiates replication at the nick and displaces a
`downstream strand with 5’GAC at the 5’-end and a full
`complement of the primer S2 at the 3'-end. S2 binds this
`displaced strand, and exo‘ klenow extends S2 forming
`the double-stranded fragment depicted as the product
`of the step labelled "polymerize using dGTP, dCTP,
`TTP and dATP (a.S)” on the right side of FIG. 2. Simi-
`lar reactions occur with the entire set of fragments
`depicted at the bottom of FIG. 1.
`The first primer (e.g., see S1 and S2 of FIG. 1) used in
`this method generally has a length of 20-100 nucleo-
`tides. Primers of approximately 25-40 nucleotides are
`preferred. This sequence should be substantially homol-
`ogous to a sequence on the target such that under high
`stringency conditions binding will occur. The primer
`also must contain a sequence (toward the 5' end) that
`will be recognized by an endonucleases, if subsequent
`SDA occurs, and polymerases (DNA or RNA), Q beta
`replicases, enzymes that recognize origins of replication
`(such as phi29) and the like, depending on subsequent
`amplification procedures (referred to as “recognition
`sequences“). The recognition sequences generally, al-
`though not necessarily, are non palindromic when using
`SDA. Although two primers are preferred, only one is
`necessary and as many as one chooses can be employed
`(more amplifiable targets are generated with more prim-
`ers).
`The second primer (e.q., see B1 and B2 of FIG. 1) is
`designed in the manner as just described, however, the
`second primer does not have to contain a recognition
`sequence, although it may, and preferably it does con-
`tain a recognition sequence. Preferably the second set of
`primers are from about 8 to about 100 nucleotide bases
`long, more preferably the second set of primers are
`about 25 to about 4-0 nucleotide bases long, with recog-
`nition sites. If the primers do not contain recognition
`sites they are preferably about l0 to about 25 nucleotide
`bases long.
`The second primer, which should bind upstream (5')
`of the first primer, is extended by a DNA polymerase
`with strand displacement ability and lacking 5’-3’ exo-
`nuclease activity. As the second primer is extended, the
`extended product of the first primer is displaced. Al-
`though two outside or “second" primers are preferred
`for use, only one is necessary (e.g., B1) and as many as
`one chooses may be employed (the more primers used
`in the target generation scheme (FIG. 1) the greater the
`number of amplifiable target fragments containing nick-
`able recognition sites. This results in a greater amplifica-
`tion factor.)
`
`IO
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 9
`|PR2013—OO276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1018, pg. 9
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`
`5,270,184
`
`10
`enzyme could be used in an amplification system not
`requiring modified deoxynucleoside triphosphates. As
`an additional example, the restriction enzyme EcoRI
`has been shown to preferentially cleave one strand in
`noncanonical recognition sites or when its canonical
`recognition site is
`flanked by an oligopurine tract
`(Thielking et al. (1990) Biochemistry, 29, 4682; Lesser et
`al. (1990) Science 250, 776; Venditti & Wells (1991) J.
`Biol. Chem. 266, 16786). As another example, the re-
`striction enzyme Dpnl (available from New England
`Biolab

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket