throbber
[19]
`United States Patent
`[11] Patent Number:
`6,027,923
`[45] Date of Patent: Feb. 22, 2000
`Wallace
`
`
`
`USOO6027923A
`
`[54] LINKED LINEAR AMPLIFICATION 0F
`NUCLEIC ACIDS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Robert Bruce Wallace, Greenbrae,
`Calif.
`
`[73] Assignee: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules,
`Calif.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 08/826,532
`
`[22]
`
`Filed:
`
`Apr. 2, 1997
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`[63] Continuation of application No. 08/475,605, Jun. 7, 1995,
`abandoned, which is a continuation—in—part of application
`No. 08/095,442, Jul. 23, 1993, abandoned.
`
`Int. Cl.7 ...................................................... C12P 19/34
`[51]
`[52] U.S. Cl.
`..................
`435/91.2; 435/6
`[58] Field of Search
`....... 435/6, 91.2
`
`
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`.................................. 435/6
`7/1989 Vary et al.
`4,851,331
`6/1995 Wallace et al.
`..
`435/91.2
`5,426,039
`
`1/1996 Cocuzza et al.
`.
`....... 435/6
`5,484,701
`6/1996 Newton .................................. 435/91.2
`5,525,494
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`416817
`
`.
`8/1990 European Pat. Off.
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Kleppe et al., J. Mol. Biol, 56:341—361 (1971).
`Saiki et al., Science, 230:1350—1354 (1985).
`Ph. Cuniasse et al., J. Mol. Biol, 213:303—314 (1990).
`R. Eritja et al., Nucleosides & Nucleotides, 6(4):803—814
`(1987).
`s. Randall et al.,J. Biol. Chem., 262(14):6864—6870 (1987).
`F. Seela et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 15(7):3113—3129
`(1987).
`Rychlik et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 18:6409—6412 (1990).
`Wu et al., DNA Cell Biol., 10:233—238 (1991).
`
`Wittwer et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 17:4353—4357 (1989).
`Wittwer et al., Biotechniques, 10:76—83 (1991).
`Petruska et al., PNAS USA, 85:6252—6256 (1988).
`Newton et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 17:2503—2516 (1898).
`Ugozzli et al., Methods, 2:42—48 (1991).
`Reed et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 13:7207—7221 (1985).
`Church et al., PNAS USA, 81:1991—1995 (1984).
`Panet
`et
`al.,
`Journal
`of Biological Chemistry,
`249:5213—5221 (1974).
`DB. Olsen et al., “Investigation of the .
`Biochemistry 29, 1990, pp. 9546—9551.
`A. Kornberg, DNA Replication, 1980, pp. 90—93.
`F. Eckstein et al., “Phosphorothioates in Molecular Biol-
`ogy”, TIBS 14, 1989, pp. 97—100.
`. Sequences”,
`.
`R.Y. Walder et al., “Use of PCR Primers .
`Nucleic Acids Research, 2], 1993, pp. 4339—4343.
`S]. Odelberg et al., “A Method for Accurate Amplification
`.
`.
`. Sequences”, PCR Methods and Applications 3, 1993, pp.
`7—12.
`
`. EcoR ”,
`
`.
`
`Newton et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 21(5):1115—1162, 1993.
`The Stratagene 1988 Catalog, p. 39.
`
`Primary Examiner—Scott W. Houtteman
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Rothwell, Figg, Ernst, & Kurz,
`p.c.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The extensive synthesis (“amplification”) of a nucleic acid
`sequence of interest is attained through a linked series of
`multi-cycle primer extension reactions (LLA). The primers
`used in each of the primer extension reactions of the process
`contain non-replicable elements that halt nucleic acid syn-
`thesis and thereby prevent the synthesized molecules from
`serving as templates in subsequent cycles. Synthesized
`molecules accumulate during primer extension in a math-
`ematically linear fashion,
`thereby rendering the process
`relatively insensitive to contaminating nucleic acids. Mul-
`tiple primer sets are employed, thereby ensuring the accu-
`mulation of a large number of copies of the nucleic acid
`sequence of interest. The invention also provides for the
`detection of an amplified nucleic acid sequence of interest,
`as well as reagent kits for carrying out the reaction.
`
`45 Claims, 13 Drawing Sheets
`
`’l/I/I/I/A—
`—. 'l
`
`0 PRODUCT OF A PCR REACTION IS COMPLETELY DOUBLE STRANDED
`
`'///////4Z—
`—3I
`
`PRODUCTS OF AN LLA REACTION CAN BE ANNEALED TO
`‘
`FORM A DUPLEX WITH SINGLE STRANDED ENDS
`
`THIS PRODUCT IS SHORTER THAN THE CORRESPONDING
`‘
`PCR FRAGMENT
`
`I Non-replicable
`
`element
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 1
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 1
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22,2000
`
`Sheet 1 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG . 1
`
`____x____
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`____x ................................................ (d)
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 2
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 2
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 2 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG.2
`
`1O
`.........................................___f
`
`(e)
`
`......................................... /20
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 3
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 3
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 3 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG.3
`
`_—_—x————
`
`----O----
`——v——x—o———CIIIIIIII.0.00I....IIDIIIOIIOUIIIOIOIIOOOI
`
`IOIIOOCCOCIOOOCCCII...ICIIIOOOIOOIOII—~——O———-
`
`————X——-—--—IIIIOIOOIOIOI..IUIUUOOICOIUOOOIOIIDIOID...
`
`(f)
`
`~———x-———-ID.0.IIOIIIOI.OOIOOOICOCCUCUCOOOOOOOO
`
`..._.__X————
`O.IIIUIOCUIOOIOOOOII.IIIIIt'll....0.......—-———0———-
`
`.0...0......OO.COO...OCC....IIOOOOCOCOCOIO————O————
`__._._x————
`
`————O.————
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 4
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 4
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 4 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG.4
`
`l —
`
`-——x————.I.....I.I.CCCOOCCCIIIOOIIOCCCCOIIICIOOIOI
`
`I.IOUIOOCIOO.‘I..........I..I..II...’————O~-——
`
`——~—x————.I.II.IOIOO.CQOCICIOOOOIIOOOOUIOICIO......
`
`0..IIOIIOO0.0il.II.0.0...OOOOOIOOOOOO————O——_-
`
`I. I..00...I.U..‘COCDICIIIOUIUC.IIOII.————o————
`
`————x————II.IIOO.IIOOOOIIIOOCCIOICDIIOIIOIICIIOIIII
`
`—-v—-—-X---—..0..OO...O.CI...’......III...O...IOO
`
`-——-~X————O0.0I.IOOOOIOCOOOOOCIICIOOOIIOCIIOIOO
`0....IOOO0.0...COOO..0...IIOCICC.‘I...’...————o————
`
`.IOIIII.II.O...0.0..00......0000IDIOOII...————O————
`
`———-x-———.I.O.IOIIOOIUIOOIOOOOOOOOOIOOI000...-
`
`IIIOIDOC...III...IIO...0......OOOOICOOI...~———O————
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 5
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 5
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 5 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG.5
`
`...........................................
`
`(a)
`
`\20
`
`I10
`
`(b)
`
`--—b—-—
`
`..........................................
`
`(C)
`
`~_-— 1:: ooooooooooooooooooooooooo u _________ b---
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 6
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 6
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 6 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG.6
`
`OOOOIOOIIOOOOOOII.0......OOIOOIOOIIIIIO—-——O————
`--_a___
`
`_-_a-__....................................
`
`(d)
`
`—-—b—-—
`
`--—b---
`_—-—-—X————I.I.OOOOIIOUIIO.....I...OOOIOIOOOCOOOOC
`
`OOIUCCICIOIOII0.0CO...CC.00....C.......————0—————
`———-a——-—IIt.IIIO...0....IIUOIOICOOCOCOCOOOIO
`
`................................__-b__-//
`___a_-_....................................
`
`30
`
`(e)
`
`___a___.............................../\4o
`II.IIII.00...It.IUD...OOOOOOOOOOOCO———b—-—
`
`COO...OOOOOIOOOCOCOOCOOOOIOOOOOIOIl———b——-
`————x——-—I.00...0.0.0.0.0....OIOOOOCOIIOOIOOOIOI
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 7
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 7
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 7 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`REACTION 1
`
`REACTION 2
`
`QQBLESLRAEPEBM TEMPLATE
`
`BOEELELSLEAEQEEIflTéMi/WE
`
`J P1
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`P2 \_
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`m CYCLES 0F DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`EXTENSION
`
`n CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`EXTENSION
`
`
`
`n COPIES
`
`REACTION 3
`
`REACTION 4
`
`Eh— ————— ->
`
`TEMPLATE I
`,
`_
`TEMPLATE II
`_
`:1:;/P1PZ\:¥::.:
`PRIMER EXCESS
`PRIMER EXCESS “m
`
`
`
`
`
`0 CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`p CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`EXTENSION
`
`EXTENSION
`
` IIIIIII
`
`IIIIIII
`
`0 COPIES
`
`p COPIES
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 8
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 8
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 8 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG. 8A
`
`FIG. 8B
`
`REACTION 1A
`
`REACTION 2A
`
`DOUBLE STRANDED DNA TEMPLATE
`
`DOUBLE STRANDED DNA TEMPLATE
`
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`m CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`‘
`
`EXTENSION
`
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`P2
`
`
`
`n CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`EXTENSION
`
`
`
`IIA
`
`n COPIES
`
`FIG. 8C
`
`FIG. 8D
`
`REACTION 1B
`
`REACTION ZB
`
`DOUBLE STRANDED DNA TEMPLATE
`
`DOUBLE STRANDED DNA TEMPLATE
`
`P4
`
`'
`
`PRIMER L:z';
`
`EXCESS
`
`m' CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`l EXTENSION
`
`n' CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`l EXTENSION
`
`IIB
`
`n' COPIES
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 9
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 9
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 9 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`REACTION 3A
`
`REACTION 4A
`
`‘
`
`__.._. m
`TEMPLATE IIA
`
`m— ————— -»
`TEMPLATE 1A
`
`P1
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`P21
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`o CYCLES 0F DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`p CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`EXTENSION
`
`EXTENSION
`
`_ _ _ _ -
`
`
`m— ————— —-—
`
`o COPIES
`
`p COPIES
`
`REACTION 3B
`
`REACTION 43
`
`
`
`m— ————— —-—
`
`TEMPLATE IIA
`
`TEMPLATE 1A
`
`PRIMER EXCESS
`
`P4—\
`PRIMER EXCESS 3
`
`
`
`o‘ CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`p‘ CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`
`EXTENSION
`
`EXTENSION
`
`éf—E E i NIB
`
`
`
`0' COPIES
`
`p' COPIES
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 10
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 10
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 10 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`REACTION 5
`
`REACTION 6
`
`
`TEMPLATE IVA
`
`fP3
`PR|MER EXCESS
`
`m— __ __ __ __ -.
`TEMPLATE IIIA
`
`P4‘\ :
`PRIMER EXCESS -
`
`
`
`o' CYCLES OF DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`EXTENSION
`
`P' CYCLES 0F DENATURATION,
`ANNEALING AND PRIMER
`EXTENSION
`
`g E E E
`
`.___:_:m
`
`IIIB
`
`
`
`o' COPIES
`
`P' COPIES
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 11
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 11
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22,2000
`
`Sheet 11 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`FIG.11
`
`’Wl/l/I/A
`
`_W
`
`- PRODUCT OF A PCR REACTION IS COMPLETELY DOUBLE STRANDED
`
`'///////4 Z
`
`—3I
`
`0
`
`PRODUCTS OF AN LLA REACTION CAN BE ANNEALED TO
`
`FORM A DUPLEX WITH SINGLE STRANDED ENDS
`
`-
`
`THIS PRODUCT IS SHORTER THAN THE CORRESPONDING
`
`PCR FRAGMENT
`
`I Non-replicable
`
`element
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 12
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 12
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 12 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`
`
`l_..|«NNaB|L
`
`mm
`
`
`
`w<w<uwwu<UHo<<<<h<uwowkuwww<uuw<ww<uwwu<www<uw<wo<uuUHU<FuH<<uuwwhwaw<kuuu<u<uuw<wwpwhuuu<UHuu
`
`om#
`
`mmw
`
`0mm
`
`uwFUFu<<w<ww<whuUhu<wkuu<uoHO0H<uu<u<w<u<<<uHuu<<uw<Hu<uphwhwhu<<u<u<opuwpuwhhh<u<khuwph<hUH<uuII_|Imm3anVIIImmm-q8||..ln.|_
`
`
`
`<0<ww<<wkhwu<u<w<<u<Hku<<uH<wahhww<uowwhuuuww<whwuhwwhpo<<0H<wukwu<<wkwwqquwwwwhwhuuuwku<pru
`
`
`
`wdkhuuu<uuUHth<HuHowHH<FuuwHUFUHUHU<¢HU<uww<h<GPUprwwwHHuhu<w<<w<w<u<w<oohwp<uwwwku<<<w<h<<uu
`
`
`
`N_\.O_n_
`
`I_|lllllmmYQEIIIIIL
`
`muthUUHw<wHHHUkhww<0<uuu<wwkhuuu<FUkuwahuwHuw
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 13
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 13
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2000
`
`Sheet 13 0f 13
`
`6,027,923
`
`deE
`
`9040900004460400690000885UUUBUUGBQUUUUBBUBUmugBUEQflUGCUUdfiUUdUdUBHB
`
`VHHUEHmw
`
`
`
`UUOOHUUdUUdUOBUBUUBflUUDGUGU09.09.0490UU§U¢OBBBHBUUGfiUBfiBBUUUBBflUUfiUUUBB.‘m
`
`
`
`d0.4.0004009.300UgmuUUUBBBBBUUU<UBU040UgBUAmUdUOdGOngBgUUOBUUUUUUUBB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UUOwn.UGBBUUdUflBUUUfiUUBUBUUfiUdewwfigufihwgngUBfiwwdwh04090004060408
`
`BUO.40doUUUUfiwfid09009940BfidfiwfiwggwwgvofidfidfivuU§U§GU¢HUUBUBBUUBUU
`
`NEG
`
`
`
`.muUUfigwggduggdUGGCUSUBUUUdUdGOOBBdBUBUdOdUBUBBHOBU.HUUU
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 14
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 14
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`1
`LINKED LINEAR AMPLIFICATION OF
`NUCLEIC ACIDS
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATION
`
`This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/475,605,
`filed Jun. 7, 1995, now abandoned, which was a
`continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 08/095,442, filed Jul. 23,
`1993, now abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Technical Field
`
`The present invention relates to the in vitro replication of
`nucleic acids. More specifically, the invention relates to a
`process for replicating a nucleic acid sequence of interest,
`with large quantities of the desired sequence ultimately
`resulting from the linkage of primer extension reactions
`wherein the sequence of interest accumulates in a math-
`ematically linear fashion.
`2. Brief Description of the Background Art
`The extensive replication of nucleic acids, today known
`as (and referred to herein as) nucleic acid “amplification,”
`finds wide utility, both practical and theoretical, in a variety
`of contexts. H. G. Khorana and his co-workers first proposed
`the use of an in vitro DNA amplification process to increase
`available amounts of double-stranded DNA (partial
`sequences of the gene for the major yeast alanine t-RNA)
`that had been created by the enzymatic ligation of synthetic
`DNA’s. See K. Kleppe et al.; J. Mol. Biol. 56:341—361
`(1971). Later,
`in vitro amplification was applied to the
`amplification of genomic DNA (Saiki et al., Science
`230:1350—1354 (1985)) as the technique now known as the
`polymerase chain reaction or “PCR.” Through the wide
`availability of synthetic oligonucleotide primers, thermo-
`stable DNA polymerases and automated temperature cycling
`apparatus, PCR became a widely-utilized tool of the
`molecular biologist.
`The PCR process is referred to in the literature as an
`“exponential amplification” process.
`In each round or
`“cycle” of primer extension, a primer binding site for the
`other primer is synthesized. Thus, each of the synthetic DNA
`molecules produced in any of the previous cycles is avail-
`able to serve as a template for primer-dependent replication.
`This aspect of the process, coupled with the presence of a
`sufficiently large number of primer molecules, results in
`synthetic DNA accumulating in a mathematically exponen-
`tial manner as the reaction proceeds.
`Although PCR has proven to be a valuable technique for
`the molecular biologist, and has been used extensively in the
`fields of human genetic research, diagnostics and forensic
`science, and even in the detection of antibodies, disadvan-
`tages nevertheless have been recognized. The PCR process
`can be difficult to quantify accurately, mainly because the
`amplification products increase exponentially with each
`round of amplification. The products of PCR, namely,
`double-stranded DNA molecules, are difficult to analyze or
`sequence per se. Strand separation typically must be carried
`out prior to sequencing or other downstream processes that
`requires single stranded nucleic acids, such as hybridization
`to a probe capable of detecting the sequence of interest.
`The PCR process also has proven to be quite susceptible
`to contamination generated through the transfer of previ-
`ously amplified DNA sequences into a new reaction. This
`problem appears to be caused by the facts that (1) very large
`amounts of DNA are generated in any given reaction cycle
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6,027,923
`
`2
`
`and (2) the process uses all product DNA strands as tem-
`plates in subsequent cycles. Even minute quantities of
`contaminating DNA can be exponentially amplified and lead
`to erroneous results. See Kwok and Higuchi, Nature
`339:237—238 (1989). Various methods to reduce such con-
`tamination have been reported in the literature (e.g. chemical
`decontamination, physical treatment, enzyme treatment and
`utilizing closed systems), as these contamination problems
`are widely recognized. See, John B. Findlay, “Development
`of PCR for in vitro Diagnostics,” presented at “Genetic
`Recognition,” Nov. 20, 1992, San Diego, Calif.
`There has remained a need for new nucleic acid (DNA)
`amplification methods that provide large amounts of DNA,
`and that selectively amplify only a specific sequence of
`interest, but which avoid the problems now associated with
`the “PCR” reaction. Specifically, there has remained a need
`for nucleic acid amplification methods that ultimately pro-
`duce large amounts of a nucleic acid molecule of interest, or
`large amounts of a molecule containing a nucleic acid
`sequence of interest, but are relatively insensitive to the
`presence of contaminating nucleic acids. There has also
`remained a need for nucleic acid amplification methods that
`generate single-stranded products.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The foregoing and other needs are met by the present
`invention, which in one aspect provides a process for
`amplifying a specific nucleic acid sequence of interest
`within complementary nucleic acid strands contained in a
`sample, the process including the steps of:
`(a) contacting the strands with a primer that contains a
`non-replicable element, under conditions such that first
`generation primer extension products are synthesized
`using said strands as templates, and wherein the primer
`for a strand is selected such that a first generation
`primer extension product synthesized thereon, when
`separated from the strand, can serve as a template for
`synthesis of a second generation primer extension
`product of the primer for the complement of the strand;
`(b) separating the first generation primer extension prod-
`ucts from their templates to produce single-stranded
`molecules; and
`(c) treating the first generation primer extension products
`with the primers of step (a) under conditions such that
`second generation primer extension products are syn-
`thesized using the first generation primer extension
`products as templates;
`wherein the second generation primer extension products
`contain at least a portion of the nucleic acid sequence
`of interest and cannot serve as templates for the syn-
`thesis of extension products of the primers which were
`extended to synthesize their templates.
`In other aspects of the invention, the products of step (c)
`are separated to produce single-stranded molecules, and the
`entire process is repeated at least once. Step (c) preferably
`is repeated many times, with the process being carried out in
`an automated fashion under the control of a programmable
`thermal cycling apparatus.
`Following the accumulation of second generation primer
`extension products, each of which is incapable of serving as
`a template for the primer extended to prepare its first
`generation template, a new set of primers that contain
`non-replicable elements can be employed. The new set of
`primers advantageously bind to the second generation syn-
`thetic products, bounding the sequence of interest to be
`amplified. The linear replication process is again carried out
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 15
`|PR2013—00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 15
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`6,027,923
`
`3
`through a number of cycles. Such “linking together” of
`multi-cycle primer extension reactions ultimately results in
`thousand-fold or million-fold amplification of the original
`nucleic acid sequence of interest. Thus, the present process
`is deemed “linked linear amplification” or “LLA.”
`In another aspect of the invention, multiple (nested) sets
`of primers containing non-replicable elements can be pro-
`vided in a single amplification reaction mixture. The sets are
`selected so as to be capable of binding to their respective
`templates under decreasingly stringent conditions. Thus, all
`the components necessary to carry out several linked linear
`amplifications can be provided in a single reaction mixture.
`In yet another aspect of the invention, allele-specific
`nucleic acid replication is carried out according to the
`present invention with the use of primers directed to specific
`polymorphic sites on the template that are known to be
`indicative of a genetic disease or disorder, such as sickle cell
`disease. The allele-specific primers, containing non-
`replicable elements, are designed so that they prime nucleic
`acid synthesis of only those templates containing the desired
`allele.
`
`The synthetic nucleic acid molecules resulting from the
`present process can be used in the diagnosis of genetic
`disorders or diseases, as reagents in further techniques such
`as gene cloning, for forensic identification, etc.
`The process described herein also can be carried out using
`a single nucleic acid strand as a starting material. Such a
`process comprises:
`(a) contacting the strand with a first primer containing a
`non-replicable element, under conditions such that a
`first generation primer extension product is synthesized
`using the strand as a template;
`(b) separating the first generation primer extension prod-
`uct from its template to produce single stranded mol-
`ecules; and
`(c) contacting the first generation primer extension prod-
`uct with a second primer containing a non-replicable
`element under conditions such that a second generation
`primer extension product is synthesized using the first
`generation primer extension product as a template;
`wherein the primers are selected so that
`the second
`generation primer extension product cannot serve as a
`template for extension of the first primer. Steps (a)—(c)
`can be repeated many times, resulting in extensive
`nucleic acid synthesis, following which the reaction is
`linked to a subsequent reaction using a new set of
`primers.
`The processes described herein also can be carried out
`using primers containing cleavable elements. This process
`comprises:
`(a) contacting the strands of a nucleic acid template with
`a first primer containing a cleavable element, under
`conditions such that a first generation primer extension
`product is synthesized using the strand as a template;
`(b) separating the first generation primer extension prod-
`uct from its template to produce single stranded mol-
`ecules;
`(c) treating the single stranded molecules such that the
`first generation primer extension product is cleaved at
`the position of the cleavable element;
`(d) contacting the first generation primer extension prod-
`uct with a second primer under conditions such that a
`second generation primer extension product is synthe-
`sized using the first generation primer extension prod-
`uct as a template;
`the second
`wherein the primers are selected so that
`generation primer extension product cannot serve as a
`
`4
`template for extension of the first primer, when the first
`primer extension product has been cleaved at the cleav-
`able element. Steps (a)—(d) can be repeated many times,
`resulting in extensive nucleic acid synthesis, following
`which the reaction may be linked to a subsequent
`reaction using a new set of primers. Additionally, the
`second primer may optionally contain a cleavable ele-
`ment such that the linked linear amplification reaction
`can be carried out on either a double-stranded or a
`
`single-stranded starting template.
`The present invention also relates to a reagent kit for use
`in amplifying a particular nucleic acid sequence. Such kit
`includes, for example, a DNA polymerase, two or more
`primers for each sequence to be amplified wherein each of
`said primers comprises a non-replicable element or incor-
`porates a cleavable element, and, optionally, a control
`nucleic acid sequence capable of being replicated by the
`primers and DNA polymerase. The kit also may contain a
`nucleic acid probe capable of indicating the presence or
`absence of an amplification product of the particular
`sequence. Where the kit contains primers incorporating a
`cleavable element, it may also contain reagents for cleaving
`the primer at the cleavable element.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIGS. 1—4 comprise a schematic representation of a
`nucleic acid amplification process of the present invention.
`FIGS. 5—6 comprise a schematic representation of a
`nucleic acid amplification process that has been linked to the
`process represented by FIGS. 1—4.
`FIG. 7 is a more detailed schematic representation of a
`nucleic acid amplification process carried out with two
`primers according to the present invention.
`FIGS. 8—10 present a detailed schematic representation of
`a linked linear nucleic acid amplification process carried out
`with four primers according to the present invention.
`FIG. 11 is a schematic representation of nucleic acid
`molecules prepared by the PCR process and by a process
`according to the present invention.
`FIG. 12 is a schematic representation of the sequence of
`the human B-globin gene (GenBank locus HUMHBB SEQ
`ID NO: 1) and of several primers described herein.
`FIG. 13 is the sequence of Human Growth Hormone
`Sequence SEQ ID NO: 15 amplified in Example 7. The
`relative positions of the oligonucleotides used in the experi-
`ment are underlined. Oligonucleotide GH1 hybridizes to the
`complement of the Human Growth Hormone sequence
`shown.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`The nucleic acid replication process of the present inven-
`tion is capable of producing large quantities of a specific
`nucleic acid sequence of interest. The process in its preferred
`form comprises a linked series of multi-cycle primer exten-
`sion reactions. In each of the multi-cycle primer extension
`reactions, primer-dependent nucleic acid replication is car-
`ried out
`through a number of cycles, with the primer
`extension products accumulating in a numerically linear
`fashion from cycle to cycle. A unique primer, or set of
`primers,
`is provided for each nucleic acid strand in the
`starting sample that contains the sequence to be amplified.
`The linear accumulation of primer extension products from
`cycle to cycle is assured through the use of primers that
`contain non-replicable elements—elements that halt
`the
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 16
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 16
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`6,027,923
`
`5
`primer extension reaction, preventing the nucleic acid poly-
`merase from replicating the entire sequence of the primer.
`Alternatively, the linear accumulation of the desired primer
`extension products is assured through the use of primers that
`contain cleavable elements, where cleavage of the first
`primer extension product results in a second primer exten-
`sion product lacking the functional binding site for the first
`primer. Through the selection of appropriate primers con-
`taining such non-replicable or cleavable elements, and
`appropriate primer annealing conditions, it is ensured that
`the primer extension products which accumulate in greatest
`abundance (referred to herein as “second generation primer
`extension products”) cannot serve as templates themselves
`in subsequent cycles of primer extension using the same
`primers. Thus, unlike nucleic acid amplification processes
`(such as “PCR”) which utilize the primer extension products
`from each cycle as templates for subsequent cycles, “expo-
`nential amplification” does not occur from cycle to cycle.
`The process of the present invention utilizes and takes
`advantage of a number of important properties of oligo-
`nucleotide hybridization and the primer extension reaction.
`The invention takes advantage of the facts that:
`DNA polymerase is able to copy a template DNA many
`times by sequential cycles of denaturation and primer-
`dependent elongation.
`Primer-dependent elongation can occur, under appropri-
`ate conditions, even if the primer is not completely
`complementary to the template.
`Primer extension can utilize a template produced in a
`previous round of primer extension.
`Primer extension is inhibited by abasic sites or by non-
`nucleotide residues when such are present in the tem-
`plate nucleic acid. Alternatively, primer extension may
`be inhibited by physically removing a portion of the
`generation primer extension product by cleaving this
`molecule at the cleavable sites incorporated into the
`primers used in the primer extension reaction.
`Primer length and composition affect, in known ways, the
`conditions (e.g., temperature) at which a primer will
`“prime” polymerase-induced extension on a template.
`Primer extension reactions can be performed in rapid
`cycles with the aid of thermal cycling apparatus.
`The present process advantageously utilizes a series of
`linear amplification reactions, which can be carried out
`(linked) either in series or in parallel (i.e., simultaneously) to
`generate a very large number of copies of a nucleic acid
`sequence of interest. The nucleic acid sequence of interest
`may encompass essentially the entire length of the template
`strand(s), or it may comprise only a very minor portion of it.
`The template strand(s) containing the sequence of interest
`may be present in a substantially homogeneous sample or as
`part (even an extremely minor part) of a mixture of nucleic
`acids.
`
`In accordance with the present invention, a primer that
`contains a non-replicable or cleavable element is provided
`for each strand containing a sequence to be amplified. In the
`case of a double-stranded template, the primer(s) are added
`either prior to or following denaturation of the template. The
`primers are permitted to anneal to their respective starting
`templates, and are extended in the presence of a polymerase
`enzyme, under conditions appropriate for the function of the
`enzyme, to form first generation primer extension products.
`The process is repeated by denaturing the resulting duplexed
`nucleic acid, permitting the primers to anneal to the strands
`and again carrying out the primer extension reaction. Primer
`extension upon the first generation primer extension prod-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`ucts yields second generation primer extension products
`which, due to the presence of non-replicable elements,
`cannot serve as templates for those same primers in subse-
`quent cycles. Alternatively, where the primer contains a
`cleavable element,
`the first generation primer extension
`products are cleaved at the position of the cleavable element,
`so that when this first generation primer extension product is
`annealed to the appropriate primer and extended, the second
`generation primer extension product formed will
`lack a
`binding site for the primer used to generate the first primer
`extension product.
`FIGS. 1—5 present a schematic representation of one
`series of primer extension reactions (i.e., one linear ampli-
`fication reaction) carried out on a DNA template according
`to the process of the present
`invention. The process is
`illustrated starting in step (a) with a double-stranded DNA
`
`molecule having defined termini. The strands of the starting
`DNA are denoted by solid (
`) lines throughout FIGS.
`1—4.
`
`The starting duplex is denatured, preferably by heating in
`a buffer solution containing the same, and the resulting
`single strands are contacted with a pair of primers (step (b)).
`Each primer preferably is provided in substantial molar
`excess of the starting template strand and contains within its
`sequence a non-replicable or alternatively, a cleavable
`element, here denoted by (x) or (0) within the primer
`sequence. Under appropriate conditions, the primers anneal
`to their respective templates and are elongated (step (c))
`according to the primer extension reaction in the presence of
`a DNA polymerase and the four deoxyribonucleotides. Syn-
`thesized DNA is denoted by dotted (""") lines in FIGS.
`1—4, and the DNA synthesized using the starting duplex
`DNA as a template is denoted “first generation” DNA. The
`resulting templates again are denatured, and the primers are
`annealed (step (d)).
`As seen in step (e) of FIG. 2, primer elongation using first
`generation DNA as a template results in the preparation of
`second generation DNA and does not progress past the
`non-replicable element incorporated into the first generation
`synthetic DNA. Thus, DNA molecules denoted by reference
`numerals 10 and 20 are synthesized. These second genera-
`tion molecules do not participate further in the primer
`extension reaction because, as seen in the Figures, molecule
`10 has not incorporated an effective binding site for the
`primer containing non-replicable or a cleavable element (x),
`and molecule 20 has not incorporated an effective binding
`site for the primer containing the non-replicable or cleavable
`element (0). Thus, as seen in steps (f) and (g), second
`generation molecules accumulate in a mathematically linear
`fashion in subsequent rounds of primer extension. ***
`Following a desired number of cycles, the synthetic DNA
`is utilized as a starting material for (i.e., linked to) a second
`series of primer extension reactions using a second set of
`primers. As seen in FIGS. 5—6, primers containing non-
`replicable elements designated (a) and (b) are selected so as
`to be able to utilize molecules 10 and 20, the products of the
`reaction of FIGS. 1—4, as templates for further DNA syn-
`thesis. This series of primer extension reactions similarly
`results in the accumulation of synthetic DNA molecules,
`designated by reference numerals 30 and 40 in step (e) of
`FIG. 6, which cannot serve as templates for the primers
`utilized in those reactions. Following a desired number of
`cycles, these synthetic molecules can be linked to further
`replication using appropriate primers again containing non-
`replicable or cleavable elements. Where the primers contain
`cleavable elements, the first primer extension reaction is
`followed by a reaction in which the first primer extension
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 17
`|PR2013-00276
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1021, pg. 17
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`6,027,923
`
`7
`product is cleaved at the position of the cleavable element,
`prior to the second primer extension reaction.
`It should thus be apparent that the synthetic nucleic acid
`products of any one series of cycles can themselves serve as
`templates for further amplification only if a new primer or
`set of primers is provided. Thus, if a first linear amplification
`is performe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket