throbber
THE LANCET
`
`Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum
`
`Y M Dennis Lo, Noemi Corbetta, Paul F Chamberlain, Vik Rai, Ian L'Sargent, Christopher W G Redman,
`James S Wainscoat
`
`Summary
`
`Background The potential use of plasma. and serum for
`molecular diagnosis has generated interest. Tumour DNA
`has been found in the plasma and serum of cancer patients,
`and molecular analysis has been done on this material. We
`investigated the equivalent condition in pregnancy-that is,
`whether fetal DNA is present in maternal plasma and serum.
`
`Methods We used a rapid-boiling method to extract DNA
`from plasma and serum. DNA from plasma, serum, and
`nucleated blood cells from 43 pregnant women underwent a
`sensitive V-peR assay to detect circulating male fetal DNA
`from women bearing male fetuses.
`
`Findings Fetus-derived Y sequences were detected in 24
`(80%) of the 30 maternal plasma samples, and in 21 (70%)
`of the 30 maternal serum samples, from women bearing
`male fetuses. These results were obtained with only 10 f-LL
`of the samples. When DNA from nucleated blood cells
`extracted from a similar volume of blood was used, only five
`(17%) of the 30 samples gave a positive Y signal. None of
`the 13 women bearing female fetuses, and none of the ten
`non-pregnant
`control women,
`had
`positive
`results
`for
`plasma, serum or nucleated blood cells.
`
`of circulating fetal DNA in
`finding
`Interpretation Our
`maternal plasma may have implications for non-invasive
`prenatal diagnosis, and for improving our understanding of
`the fetomaternal relationship.
`
`Lancet 1997; 350: 485-87
`
`Nuffield Department of Clinical Biochemistry (Y M D La MRCP),
`Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
`.(P F Chamberlain MO, Vik Rai MRCOG, I L Sargent PhD,
`Prof C W G Redman FRCP), and Department of Haematology, John
`Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
`(J W Wainscoat FRCPath); and Istituto dl Mediclna Interna e
`F1siopatologia Medica, IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy
`(N Corbetta)
`Correspondence to: Dr Y M Dennis La, Department of Chemical
`Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales
`Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
`
`Introduction
`The passage of nucleated cells between mother and fetus is
`well recognised.'·2 One important clinical application is the
`use of fetal cells in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal
`diagnosis.' This approach avoids the risks associated with
`conventional
`invasive techniques, such as amniocentesis
`and chorionic-villus sampling. Substantial advances have
`been made in the enrichment and isolation of fetal cells for
`analysis.'" However, most techniques are time-consuming
`or require expensive equipment.
`There has becn much interest in the use of DNA derived
`from plasma or
`serum for molecular diagnosis,s
`In
`particular, there have been reports that tumour DNA can
`be detected by molecular
`techniques in the plasma or
`serum of cancer patients.'o-R Such reports prompted us to
`investigate whether fetal DNA can be detected in maternal
`plasma and serum.
`
`Methods
`Patients
`Pregnant women attending the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford,
`UK) were recruited before amniocentesis or delivery. We obtained
`approval of the ptoject ftom the Central Oxfordshire Research
`Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained in each case.
`5-10 mL maternal peripheral blood was collected into one tube
`containing edetic acid and one plain tube. For women undergoing
`amniocentesis, maternal blood was always
`taken before the
`procedure, and 10 mL amniotic fluid was also collected for fetal
`sex determination. For women recruited just before delivery, fetal
`sex was noted at the time of delivery. Control blood samples were
`also taken from ten non-pregnant women, and the samples were
`processed in the same way as those obtained from the pregnant
`women.
`
`Sample preparation
`Maternal blood samples were processed 1-3 h after venesection.
`Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g, and plasma and serum
`were carefully removed from the edetic-acid-containing and plain
`tubes, respectively, and transferred into plain polypropylene tubes.
`Great care was taken to ensure that the buffy coat or the blood clot
`was undisturbed when plasma or serum samples, respectively, were
`removed. Mter removal of the plasma samples, the red-cell pellet
`and buflY coat were saved for DNA extraction with a Nucleon
`DNA extraction kit (Scotlabs, Strathclyde, Scotland, UK). The
`plasma
`and
`serum samples
`then
`underwent
`a
`second
`centrifugation at 3000 g, and the recentrifuged plasma and serum
`samples were collected into fresh polypropylene tubes. The
`samples were stored at -20°C until further processing.
`
`DNA extraction from plasma and serum samples
`Plasma and serum samples were processed for PCR by a modified
`version of Emanuel and Peska's method.' 200 f-LL plasma or serum
`in a 0·5 mL eppendorf tube was heated at 99°C for 5 min on a
`heat block. The heated sample was then centrifuged at maximum
`speed in a microcentrifuge, after which the clear supernatant was
`collected and 10 f.LL used for peR.
`
`Vol 350 • August 16, 1997
`
`485
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1035, pg. 1
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`M 1 2 3 4 567
`
`M 8 9 10 1112 13 14
`
`15 16
`
`.
`
`I"
`
`'
`
`[2529432834"
`,1722 5 393236 38,
`Case
`Controls
`Maternal plasma
`Maternal serum
`number
`Amplification of fetal Y-ehromosomal sequences from maternal
`plasma and serum
`Lanes 13 and 14~Y·PCR on male genomic DNA (positive controls); lane
`13 DNA equivalent to ten male cells; lane 14 DNA equivalent of one
`male cell. Land 15. 1 fLg female genomic DNA (negative control). Lane
`16, water (negative control). Arrow marks position of 198 bp Y·PCR
`product. M~molecular weight marker (<\>X174 DNA digested with
`Hincll).
`
`neural-tube defects. An approach by which DNA-based
`diagnosis is done on serum samples could be incorporated
`into existing screening programmes.
`Our data show that fetal DNA can be detected in as little
`as 10 iLL maternal plasma and serum. The detection rate is
`much higher than that for DNA from nucleated blood cells
`extracted from a similar volume of whole blood. This
`fmding suggests a relative enrichment of fetal DNA in
`maternal plasma and serum, a phenomenon analogous to
`the relative enrichment of tumour DNA in the plasma and
`serum of cancer patients.'·s The low detection rate of fetal
`DNA sequences for DNA from nucleated blood cells
`
`Case number
`
`Male fetuses
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`30
`
`Female fetu59S
`31
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`38
`39
`40
`41
`42
`43
`
`Gestation
`(weeks)
`
`y·peR
`
`Plasma
`
`Serum
`
`Blood
`
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`+
`t
`+
`+
`
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`12
`14
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`17
`17
`22
`40
`40
`40
`40
`40
`40
`40
`40
`
`15
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`17
`17
`17
`18
`40
`40
`40
`
`Amplification of fetal Y-ehromosomal sequences from maternal
`plasma, serum, and blood
`
`THEU\NCET
`
`DNA extraction from amniotic fluid
`The amniotic-fluid samples were processed for PCR by the
`method of Rebello and colleagues." 100 floL amniotic fluid was
`transferred into a 0·5 mL eppendorf rube, and mixed with an
`equal volume of 10% Chelex-100 (Bio-Rad). After addition of 20
`floL mineral oil to prevent evaporation, the tube was incubated at
`56°C for 30 min on a heat block. The tube was then vortexed
`briefly and incubated at 99°C for 20 min. The treated amniotic
`fluid was stored at 4°C until PCR, and 10 floL was used in a
`100 floL reaction.
`
`peR
`The PCR was carried out broadly as described elsewhere" with
`reagents from a GeneAmp DNA Amplification Kit (Perkin Elmer,
`Foster City, CA, USA). The detection ofY-specific fetal sequence
`from maternal plasma, serum, and cellular DNA was done as
`described with primers Y1·7 and Y1·S, designed to amplifY a
`single-copy sequence (DYS14)." The V-specific product was 19S
`bp. 60 cycles of Hot Start PCR with Ampliwax technology were
`used on 10 floL maternal plasma or serum, or on 100 ng maternal
`nucleated blood-cell DNA; each cycle consists of a denaturation
`step at 94°C for 1 min, and a combined reannealinglextension step
`at 57°C for 1 min. 40 cycles were used for amplification of
`amniotic fluid. PCR products were analysed by agarose-gel
`electrophoresis and ethidium-bromide staining. PCR results were
`scored before fetal sex was revealed to the investigator.
`
`Results
`Serial dilutions of male genomic DNA in 1 iLg female
`genomic DNA were carried out and amplified by the Y(cid:173)
`PCR system with 60 cycles of amplification. Positive
`signals were detected up to the 1/100000 dilution-ie, the
`approximate equivalent of a single male cell.
`The optimum volume of heated plasma and serum
`samples for PCR amplification was assessed by subjecting
`1 iLL, 2 iLL, 10 iLL, 30 iLL, and 50 iLL heated plasma or
`serum samples from male individuals to Y-PCR. The best
`serum.
`signal was obtained from 10 iLL plasma or
`Complete inhibition of amplification was reached with 50
`iLL. Thus, 10 iLL heated plasma or serum samples were
`used for subsequent experiments.
`Maternal plasma and serum samples were collected from
`43 women who were between 12 and 40 weeks pregnant.
`There were 30 male and 13 female fetuses. Among the 30
`women bearing male fetuses, Y-positive
`signals were
`detected in 24 plasma samples and 21 serum samples
`when 10 iLL of the samples was used for PCR (figure and
`table). When DNA from nucleated blood-eells was used for
`Y-PCR, positive signals were detected in only five of the 30
`cases (table). None of the 13 women bearing female
`fetuses, and none of the ten non-pregnant control women,
`had a positive Y signal when plasma, serum, or cellular
`DNA was amplified.
`
`Discussion
`Our results show that fetal DNA is present in maternal
`plasma and serum. Use of maternal plasma or serum for
`the detection of fetal DNA for non-invasive prenatal
`diagnosis may therefore be possible. Ironically, plasma is
`the material routinely discarded in the early stages of many
`DNA-extraction protocols, and also after
`the density(cid:173)
`centifugaton step used by many investigators for non(cid:173)
`invasive prenatal diagnosis. This is probably one of the
`reasons why the presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma
`has not been explored previously.
`Maternal serum is being used by many centres for
`biochemical screening of chromosomal aneuploidies and
`
`486
`
`Vol 350 • August 16, 1997
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1035, pg. 2
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

`

`resulted from the use of only 100 ng DNA, compared with
`1 j.Lg in our previous study. 12 We chose 100 ng because this
`was the average quantity of DNA extracted from 10 j.LL
`whole blood with our genomic DNA-extraction method.
`This
`approach
`allows
`us
`to
`compare
`the
`relative
`detectability of fetal DNA in 10 j.LL plasma or serum and
`the cellular component of 10 j.LL whole blood.
`The detection rate of fetal DNA in 10 j.LL plasma and
`serum is already high at 80% and 70%, respectively, but
`these rates can probably be improved. 1 mL maternal blood
`or serum, for example, will result in a one hundred-fold
`increase in the absolute amount of fetal genetic material
`available for analysis. Such a magnitude of increase should
`lead to a robust and non-invasive system for detection of
`paternally inherited fetal DNA sequences. However, more
`work is needed before this can be achieved, since the
`boiling method we used resulted in a relatively impure
`DNA extract, which inhibited PCR when volumes much
`larger than 10 j.LL were used. We are investigating other
`DNA-extraction methods for plasma and serum. We believe
`that concentration methods for plasma and serum DNA
`could potentially be easier than many fetal-cell
`isolation
`methods, such as cell sorting and micromanipulation.
`The relative merit of the use of plasma or serum samples
`requires further investigation. In seven cases-2, 7,8,9,10,
`22, and 29-there was discordance in the PCR results
`obtained
`from the
`plasma
`and
`serum. A possible
`explanation for the discrepancies is that the quantity of fetal
`DNA in these cases may have a limiting effect, and thus
`sampling errors could be contributing to the observed
`results. Future research with quantitative PCR assays may
`elucidate this effect.
`In four cases with male fetuses, both plasma and serum
`were negative for fetal DNA (cases 1, 11, 12, and 30).
`Three of
`these women were tested at 15 weeks of
`pregnancy or earlier (cases 1, 11, and 12). Furthermore, of
`the seven cases in which there was discordance between
`plasma and serum samples, all but one were tested before
`23 weeks. Taken together,
`these results suggest
`that
`the
`concentration
`of
`fetal DNA increases
`as
`gestation
`progresses, possibly owing to the increase in fetal size. This
`result is analogous to that of N awroz and colleagues,' who
`detected in head and neck cancer patients mutant plasma
`DNA predominantly in those with high tumour
`load.
`Future studies should investigate the temporal
`relation
`between gestation and the appearance and concentration of
`fetal DNA in maternal plasma.
`for
`teclmiques
`disorders,
`as
`sex-linked
`As well
`fetal-DNA detection in maternal plasma or serum can also
`be used to detect many paternally inherited DNA
`sequences that differ from their maternal counterparts.
`Clinical examples include fetal rhesus D status assessment"
`and .detection of certain haemoglobinopathies. I
`' The
`plasma or serum-based approach might also be applicable
`to screening for chromosomal
`aneuploidies
`(such as
`Down's syndrome) if there is a quantitative difference in
`the concentration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and
`serum between affected and normal pregnancies; this is a
`situation analogous to the high concentration of fetal cells
`detectable in pregnancies that involve aneuploid fetuses. I
`Fetal-cell isolation, however, will nevertheless be necessary
`for
`the
`definitive
`cytogenetic
`diagnosis
`of
`fetal
`chromosomal aneuploidies, and for the direct mutational
`analysis of autosomal
`recessive disorders caused by a
`single mutation.
`The presence of
`
`fetal DNA in maternal plasma
`
`'
`
`THE LANCET
`
`and serum has not been previously described. The
`underlying processes
`that cause free fetal DNA to be
`released into the maternal circulation have yet
`to be
`explained. Possible mechanisms include cell lysis resulting
`from physical
`and
`immunological
`damage,
`and
`developmentally regulated apoptosis of certain fetal tissues.
`There are interesting similarities between a growing fetus
`and a neoplasm: both are immunologically foreign to--and
`have an extensive vascular
`interface with-their hosts.
`Investigation of the variations in fetal-DNA concentrations
`in conditions in which the placental interface is damaged
`(eg, pre-eclampsia) would be of clinical and biological
`interest.
`
`Contributors
`Y M Dennis La and James S Wainsco3r initiated the project. Y M Dennis La
`reviewed literature, supervised the daily practical work and analysis of
`laboratory results. Noemi Corbetta designed the experimental methods and
`was the main laboratory worker. Pa ul F Chamberlain, Vik Rai,
`Ian L Sargem and ChristopherW G Redman designed the clinical module
`of the project. Paul F Chamberlain and Vik Rai were responsible for the
`clinical correlation of laboratory results. Ian L Sargent,
`ChriSlopherW G Redman and James SWainscoat analysed laborarory
`results. James S Wainscoat designed the DNA-extraction methods, and
`supervised the writing of the manuscript. All the authors read and
`contributed to the writing of the paper.
`
`Acknowledgments
`YMDL is supported by the Wellcome Trust. We thank N Manning for
`assistance in sample collection and S L Wong for helpful discussion.
`
`References
`LoYMD, Patel P, Wainscoat IS, Sampierro M, Gilimer MDG, Fleming
`KA. Prenatal sex determination by DNA amplification from maternal
`peripheral blood. Lancer 1989; ti: 1363-65.
`2 LaY.MD, 1.0 ESF, Watson N, et al. Two~way cell traffic between mother
`and fetus biologic and clinical implications. Blood 1996; 88: 4390-95.
`Simpson.JL, Elias S. Isolating fetal cells from maternal blood: advances
`in prenatal diagnosis through molecular technology. JAMA 1993; 270:
`2357-61.
`4 Cheung MC, Goldberg]D, Kan YW. Prenatal diagnosis of sickle cell
`anemia and thalassemia by analysis affetal cells in maternal blood. Nat
`Gene< 1996; 14: 264-68.
`Mulcahy HE, Croke DT, Farrhing MJG. Cancer and mutanr DNA in
`blood plasma. La"'" 1996; 348: 628.
`StrOlli1 M, Anker P, Maurice P, Lyautey JJ Lederrey C) Beljanski M.
`Neoplastic characteristics of the DNA found in the plasma of cancer
`patients. Oncology 1989; 46: 318-22.
`Chen XQ, Stroun M, Magnenat J-l.., et a!' Microsatellite alterations in
`plasma DNA ofsmall cell lung cancer patienrs. Nal Med 1996; 2:
`1033-35.
`Nawroz H, Koch W, Anker P, Stroun M, Sidransky D. Microsiltellirc
`alterations in serum DNA of head and neck cancer patients. Nat Med
`1996; 2: 1035-37.
`Emanuel SL, Pestka S. Amplificarion of specific gene produCts from
`human serum. GATA 1993; 10: 144--46.
`10 Rebello MT, Hackett G, Smith J, et al. Extraction of DNA from
`amniotic fluid cells for the early prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease.
`PrenatDiaglll991; 11: 41-46.
`II Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Sroffel S, et al. Primer-directed enzymatic
`amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science
`1988; 239: 487-91.
`12 Lo YMD, Patel P, Sampietro M, Gilimer MDG, Fleming KA, Wainscoat
`IS. Detection of single-copy fetal DNA sequence from maternal blood.
`La"cer 1990; 335: 1463-64.
`13 LoYMD, Bowell PI, Selinger M J et a1. Prenatal determination of feral
`RhD status by analysis of peripheral blood of rhesus negative mothers.
`La"cer 1993; 341: 1147-48.
`14 Camaschella CJ Alfarano A, Gottardi E l et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal
`hemoglobin Lepore-Boston disease on maternal peripheral blood. Blood
`1990; 75: 21 02-{)6.
`15 Bianchi DW, Williams JM, Pelletier C, Klinger KW, Shuber AP. Fetal cell
`quanritation in maternal blood samples from normal and aneuploid
`pregnancies. Pediatr Res 1996; 39: 142 (abstr).
`
`Vol 350 • August 16, 1997
`
`487
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1035, pg. 3
`IPR2013-00276
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket