throbber
llIIlIlllIlIlIllIlIllIllIllIIlllIIllllIIllIIllIllIllIIllIllIIlIlllIllIIlIllIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`US 20070202525AI
`
`&19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication
`Quake et al.
`
`(Io) Pub. No. : US 2007/0202525 A1
`Aug. 30, 2007
`(43) Pub. Date:
`
`(54) NON-INVASIVE FETAL GENETIC
`SCREENING BY DIGITAL ANALYSIS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Stephen Quake, Stanford, CA (US);
`Hei-Mun Christina Fan, Stanford, CA
`(US)
`
`Publication ClassiTication
`
`(51) Int. Cl.
`C12Q 1/68
`C12P 19/34
`(52) U. S. Cl.
`
`(2006. 01)
`(2006. 01)
`
`435/6; 435/91. 2
`
`Correspondence Address:
`PETERS VERNY, L. L. P.
`425 SHERMAN AVENUE
`SUITE 230
`PALO ALTO, CA 94306 (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland
`Stanford Junior University
`
`(21) Appl. No. :
`
`11/701, 6S6
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Feb. 2, 2007
`
`Related U. S. Application Data
`
`(60) Provisional application No. 60/764, 420, filed on Feb.
`2, 2006.
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The present methods are exemplified by a process in which
`maternal blood containing
`fetal DNA is diluted to a nominal
`value of approximately 0. 5 genome equivalent of DNA per
`reaction sample. Digital PCR is then be used
`to detect
`that causes Down Syn-
`such as the trisomy
`aneuploidy,
`drome. Since aneuploidies
`do not present a mutational
`change in sequence, and are merely a change in the number
`of chromosomes,
`it has not been possible to detect them in
`to invasive
`a fetus without
`such as
`resorting
`techniques
`amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling. Digital amplifi-
`the detection of aneuploidy using massively
`cation allows
`and detection methods,
`parallel amplification
`examining,
`e. g. , 10, 000 genome equivalents.
`
`10
`
`12
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`Q»
`
`Q»
`
`O»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`D
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 1
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Aug. 30, 2007 Sheet 1 of 5
`
`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`10
`
`12
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`0»
`
`Q»
`
`Q»
`
`Q»
`
`Q»
`
`Q»
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`B
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`21, 21
`22, 22
`
`D
`
`Fig. 1A
`
`16
`
`20
`
`Chromosome 21
`
`Chromosome 22 (All peaks
`the same height)
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 2
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Aug. 30, 2007 Sheet 2 of 5
`
`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`16
`
`20
`
`Chromosome 21
`
`Chromosome 22 (fewer peaks)
`
`22
`
`24
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 3
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Aug. 30, 2007 Sheet 3 of 5
`
`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`10
`
`12
`
`Chr21 FAM
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 4
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Aug. 30, 2007 Sheet 4 of 5
`
`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`10
`
`12
`
`Ghr 12 HEX
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 5
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication Aug. 30, 2007 Sheet 5 of 5
`
`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`o 5
`
`4
`
`tO
`
`Ol c 3
`I O
`C I 2
`
`'Q
`
`1
`
`O
`
`0. 3
`
`0. 4
`
`0. 5
`
`0. 6
`
`Percent Down's DNA
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 6
`
`

`

`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`Aug. 30, 2007
`
`NON-INVASIVE FETAL GENETIC SCREENING BY
`DIGITAL ANALYSIS
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`from U. S. Provi-
`[0001] This application claims priority
`sional Patent Application No. 60/764, 420 filed on Feb. 2,
`2006, which
`by reference
`incorporated
`is hereby
`in its
`entirety.
`
`STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT
`[0002] This invention was made with U. S. Government
`support. The U. S. Government may have certain rights
`in
`this invention.
`
`REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING
`the paper copy of the
`[0003] Applicants
`assert
`that
`to the Sequence Listing
`in
`Sequence Listing
`is identical
`com-
`computer readable form found on the accompanying
`the contents of the
`puter disk. Applicants
`incorporate
`listing by reference
`in its entirety.
`sequence
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`[0004] 1. Field of the Invention
`relates to the field of fetal
`[0005] The present
`invention
`genetic screening and to the field of quantitative nucleic acid
`analysis.
`[0006] 2. Related Art
`[0007]
`It is now recognized that fetal DNA sheds from the
`placenta and mixes with the mother's blood at fairly high
`between 3% and 6% of DNA in the mother's blood
`levels
`is from the fetus. This observation has been used in con-
`junction with PCR assays for a variety of fetal genetic
`the tech-
`screens
`gender, Rh, and thalassemia. However,
`for two primary
`reasons:
`first, the
`limited
`nique remains
`trade ofl' sensitivity
`PCR assays
`for specificity, making
`it
`and second,
`to identify particular mutations,
`the
`difficult
`is a chro-
`most common genetic disorder, Down Syndrome,
`trisomy and therefore cannot be detected by con-
`mosomal
`ventional PCR in a mixed sample.
`[0008]
`It has now been found that these problems can be
`examination of large numbers of
`solved by quantitative
`the use of highly
`chromosome
`scalable
`samples
`through
`is termed here "digital analysis, "
`techniques. This approach
`the separation of the extracted genomic mate-
`and involves
`the detection of a target
`into discrete units
`rial
`so that
`sequence (e. g. , chromosome 21) may be simply quantified
`as binary (0, I) or simple multiples, 2, 3, etc. The primary
`example of a technique
`that can be used
`to yield such
`is "digital PCR, " which allows efficient
`"digital" results
`followed by subse-
`from single molecules,
`amplification
`quent quantitative analysis. Digital PCR, as the term is used
`limited dilution of a nucleic
`here, refers to a quantitative,
`acid sample, such as into multiwell plates, then the ampli-
`fication of a nucleic acid molecule
`in a well, which due to
`the dilution, should be either 0 or I molecule. Digital PCR
`to detect
`using multiwell plates has been used previously
`rare mutations by either serial analysis of single molecule
`(Vogelstein B, Kinzler K W. Proc
`(ke. , clonal) amplicons
`Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999 Aug. 3; 96 (16): 9236-41) or by
`the sensitivity of difl'erential amplification
`enhancing
`(http: //
`
`www. fluidigm. corn/didIFC. htm). Described below
`is an
`invention whereby digital PCR can be applied to noninva-
`in order to detect fetal mutations with
`sive fetal diagnostics
`is possible with
`specificity and sensitivity beyond what
`conventional PCR analysis.
`[0009] Furthermore,
`in connection with
`as also described
`the invention described below, digital PCR can be used to
`detect aneuploidy,
`that causes Down
`such as the trisomy
`Syndrome. Since aneuploidies do not present a mutational
`change in sequence, and are merely a change in the number
`of chromosomes,
`it has not been possible to detect them in
`to invasive
`a fetus without
`such as
`resorting
`techniques
`(Science 309, 2
`amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling
`Sep. 2005 pp. 1476-8).
`[0010] Another form of digital PCR has been described as
`emulsion PCR, which has been used to prepare small beads
`in essence, each bead con-
`with clonally amplified DNA
`tains one amplicon of digital PCR. (Dressman et al, Proc
`Natl Acad Sci USA. 100, 8817 (Jul. 22, 2003)).
`form of Digital PCR can be carried out
`[0011] Another
`described below,
`using microfluidics.
`In this embodiment,
`DNA is diluted and separated
`into small, discrete samples
`reaction samples by a series of channels and
`for forming
`valves.
`[0012] An example of a suitable method for single mol-
`that may be adapted to the present methods
`ecule analysis
`is
`in Braslavsky et al. , "Sequence information
`can be
`given
`obtained from single DNA molecules, Proc. Nat. Head. Sci.
`100(7): 3960-3964 (2003), which uses sequential
`incorpo-
`ration of labeled nucleotides onto an immobilized
`single
`stranded DNA
`by fluorescent
`and monitoring
`template
`microscopy.
`[0013] Another aspect of the relevant art involves sample
`in order to carry out the present processes. That
`preparation
`is, the fetal DNA may be enriched relative to maternal DNA.
`Chan, et al. , "Size Distribution of Maternal and Fetal DNA
`in Maternal Plasma, "Clin. Chem. 50(1): 88-92 (2004)
`reports that plasma DNA molecules are mainly short DNA
`in the plasma of pregnant
`fragments. The DNA fragments
`longer than DNA fragments
`from
`women are significantly
`non-pregnant women, and longer than fetal DNA.
`
`Related Publications and Patents
`
`[0014] Vogelstein et al. , "Digital Amplification, " U. S. Pat.
`No. 6, 440, 705, issued Aug. 27, 2002, discloses the identi-
`fication of pre-defined mutations expected to be present in a
`minor fraction of a cell population.
`[0015] Lo, "Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma: Biology and
`Diagnostic Applications, "Clin. Chem. 46:1903-1906 (2000)
`of fetal DNA
`discloses
`in maternal
`the demonstration
`level of 3. 4%
`plasma. The authors found a mean fractional
`fetal DNA in maternal DNA in plasma during early preg-
`report detection of the RhD gene and
`nancy. The authors
`in the plasma of pregnant
`microsatellite
`polymorphisms
`women.
`[0016] Li et al. , "Detection of Paternally
`Inherited Fetal
`for JJ-Thalassemia Using Size Fractionated
`Point Mutations
`Cell-Free DNA in Maternal Plasma, "J. Amer. Med. Assoc.
`that the analysis of
`293:843-849 (Feb. 16, 2005) discloses
`cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma has proven
`to be
`reliable for the assessment of fetal loci absent
`remarkably
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 7
`
`

`

`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`Aug. 30, 2007
`
`from the maternal genome, such as Y-chromosome
`specific
`sequences or the RhD gene in pregnant women who are
`Rh-negative. The authors report on the extraction and size
`fractionation of maternal plasma DNA using agarose gel
`electrophoresis. Then, peptide-nucleic
`acids (PNA) were
`used to bind specifically to a maternal allele to suppress PCR
`amplification of the of the wild type maternal allele, thereby
`for the presence of paternally
`enriching
`inherited mutant
`sequences. Four distinct point mutations
`in the JJ-globin
`It was found that the PNA step was
`gene were examined.
`for the detection of mutant alleles using allele
`necessary
`specific PCR.
`[0017] Lo et al. , "Quantitative Analysis of Fetal DNA in
`for Noninvasive
`Maternal Plasma and Serum: Implications
`Prenatal Diagnosis, "Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62:768-775 (1998)
`discloses a real-time quantitative PCR assay to measure
`the
`concentration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum.
`The authors found a mean of 25. 4 genome equivalents/ml of
`to about
`fetal DNA in early pregnancy. This corresponds
`3. 4% of total DNA in early pregnancy.
`[0018] Chan et al. , "Size Distribution of Maternal
`and
`in Maternal Plasma, "Clin. Chem. 50:89-92
`Fetal DNA
`the size distribution of plasma
`(January 2004) investigated
`DNA in non-pregnant women and pregnant women, using a
`panel of quantitative PCR assays with diflerent amplicon
`that the DNA
`the leptin gene. They found
`sizes targeting
`in the plasma of pregnant women are significantly
`fragments
`longer than those in the plasma of non-pregnant women, and
`the maternal-derived DNA molecules are longer
`the
`than
`fetal-derived ones.
`[0019] Tufan et al. , "Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA
`from Maternal Plasma and Serum Using a Conventional
`Multiplex PCR: Factors Influencing Success, "Turk J. Med.
`the success rates of two
`Sci. 35: 85-92 (2005) compared
`the heat based direct
`difl'erent DNA extraction
`techniques,
`method and the QIAMP DNA blood mini kit method. The
`crucial role of PCR optimization was also reported. The
`authors used the DYS14 marker for the Y chromosome and
`the GAPH gene for a control. The QIAMP mini kit was
`in sex determination
`found to give the best results
`analysis
`using multiplex PCR and ethidium bromide staining on gels.
`analysis of
`[0020] Hromadnikova
`et al. , "Quantitative
`DNA levels in maternal plasma
`in normal and Down Syn-
`drome pregnancies, "BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2(4):
`1-5 (2002), investigated
`total DNA
`levels
`in maternal
`plasma and found no difference in fetal DNA levels between
`fetuses and the con-
`the patients carrying Down Syndrome
`trols. Real time quantitative PCR analysis was performed
`to the JJ-globin gene and the SRY locus.
`using primers
`and Rosen, "Molecular Diagnosis of
`[0021] Grundevikk
`Aneuploidies, " published on line at http: //www. molbiotech-
`
`. chalmers. se/research/mk/mbtk/
`ploidies%20-
`Molecular%20diagnostics%20of%20aneu
`for
`that non-invasive methods
`%20rapport. pdf, suggests
`detection of aneuploidies
`as Down Syndrome,
`(such
`Edwards Syndrome or extra sex chromosomes) may be
`carried out on fetal nucleated cells isolated from maternal
`blood. In their review, the authors also describe quantitative
`fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), based on
`amplification of short tandem repeats specific for the chro-
`to be tested. They describe tests where DNA was
`mosome
`from amniotic or chorionic villus samples. The
`amplified
`
`that the STR markers will give PCR prod-
`authors suggest
`ucts of difl'erent
`size, and these size difl'erences may be
`It is also
`studied by analyzing peak sizes in electrophoresis.
`real time PCR may be used to
`that quantitative
`proposed
`the amount of a
`diagnose Down Syndrome by comparing
`gene located on chromosome 12 to the amount of a gene
`located on another autosomal chromosome. If the ratio of
`these two genes is I: I, the fetus is normal, but if the ratio of
`these genes is 3:2, it indicates Down Syndrome. The authors
`propose the use of Down Syndrome marker DSCR3. They
`gene GAPDH on chro-
`also suggest
`that the housekeeping
`mosome 12 can be used as a reference.
`
`[0022] Poon
`"Difl'erential DNA Methylation
`et al. ,
`between Fetus and Mother as a Strategy for Detecting Fetal
`DNA in Maternal Plasma, "Clin. Chem. 48(1): 35-41 dis-
`closes the detection of genes or mutations
`in a fetus where
`the same mutation or condition
`in maternal
`is also present
`DNA. That is, the use of fetal DNA in maternal plasma
`is
`limited due to the low amount of fetal DNA compared
`to
`maternal DNA. The authors overcame
`limitation by
`this
`the IGF2-H19 locus, which
`in a
`detecting
`is maintained
`in the paternal allele and is unm-
`methylated DNA status
`in the maternal allele. The authors used a bisulfite
`ethylated
`modification kit whereby unmethylated
`residues
`cytosine
`to uracil. The sequence difl'erence between
`were converted
`could be
`and unmethylated DNA sequences
`methylated
`distinguished with diflerent PCR primers. DNA extracted
`from buffy coat was used.
`[0023] Science 309:1476 (2 Sep. 2005) News Focus "An
`Earlier Look at Baby's Genes" describes attempts to develop
`using maternal blood. Early
`for Down Syndrome
`tests
`to detect Down Syndrome using fetal cells from
`attempts
`maternal blood were called "just modestly encouraging. "
`The report also describes work by Dennis Lo to detect the
`Rh gene in a fetus where
`in the mother. Other
`it is absent
`mutations passed on from the father have reportedly been
`detected as well, such as cystic fibrosis, beta-thalassemia,
`a
`type of dwarfism and Huntington's
`disease. However,
`these
`results have not always been reproducible.
`[0024] United States Patent Application 20040137470 to
`Jul. 15, 2004, entitled
`Dhallan, Ravinder S, published
`"Methods for detection of genetic disorders, " describes a
`method for detecting genetic disorders using PCR of known
`template DNA and restriction analysis. Also described is an
`for fetal DNA. It also describes a
`enrichment procedure
`abnor-
`method used to detect mutations,
`and chromosomal
`including but not limited to translocation,
`transver-
`malities
`trisomy, and other aneuploidies, deletion,
`sion, monosomy,
`and rear-
`translocation,
`addition, amplification,
`fragment,
`can be detected simul-
`rangement. Numerous abnormalities
`is said to provide a non-invasive
`taneously. The method
`the sequence of fetal DNA from a
`to determine
`method
`tissue, such as blood, drawn from a pregnant
`female, and a
`free nucleic acid from a sample con-
`method for isolating
`taining nucleic acid.
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`[0025] The following brief summary
`to
`is not intended
`include all features and aspects of the present invention, nor
`does it imply that the invention must include all features and
`aspects discussed
`in this summary.
`[0026] Briefly,
`is directed
`the present
`invention
`method of diflerential detection of target sequences
`
`to a
`in a
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 8
`
`

`

`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`Aug. 30, 2007
`
`3
`
`mixture of maternal and fetal genetic material. One obtains
`tissue containing both maternal and fetal genetic
`maternal
`tissue is maternal periph-
`material. Preferably,
`the maternal
`eral blood or blood plasma. The term "plasma" may include
`plasma or serum. The genetic material may be genomic
`DNA or RNA, preferably mRNA. In the case of mRNA, one
`may choose target sequences corresponding
`to genes that are
`in the placenta for fetal genetic material.
`highly expressed
`The genetic material (e. g. , DNA) in each reaction sample is
`detected with a sequence specific reactant directed to at least
`one of two target sequences
`in the genetic material to obtain
`a detectible reaction product if the target sequence is present
`in the reaction sample. For example, a probe specific to
`chromosome 21 is bound to the reaction sample, along with
`a control probe specific to another chromosome.
`In most
`cases, the results will be from maternal DNA, but a small
`number of results will be obtained from fetal DNA. In order
`to distinguish
`from fetal results, a large
`random variation
`number of reactions are run, and statistical methods are
`to the results. The labeling and detection
`in the
`applied
`the presence or
`to distinguish
`is used
`present method
`absence of a single target sequence, referred to as "digital
`analysis, " although
`it may be performed with sensitive
`nucleic acid detection methods which distinguish between
`one and more than one target sequence in a discrete sample.
`Many fluorescent techniques have this sensitivity. The target
`sequences are chosen so that a maternal sequence and a fetal
`such as two copies of a mater-
`sequence are distinguishable,
`two copies of a fetal sequence.
`nal sequence versus
`[0027] The genetic material
`is distributed
`thus obtained
`into discrete samples, where each sample will contain, on
`average not more than about one target sequence per sample.
`The average of one target sequence means that, for practical
`the sample will contain, preferably 0. 1 to 0. 8
`reasons,
`genome equivalents per discrete sample, ideally 0. 5 genome
`equivalent per sample. The method may be performed with
`target sequences are detected
`dilutions whereby more
`in
`samples containing a trisomic or increased copy number of
`target sequence. That is, if one is analyzing chromosome 21,
`the mixture may be diluted such that, on average, one may
`detect two chromosomes present
`in a maternal DNA, and
`in a Down Syndrome fetal DNA. Alter-
`three chromosomes
`the method may be performed with dilutions
`natively,
`whereby more reaction samples are positive in this situation.
`The presence or absence of diflerent
`in the
`target sequences
`is detected; and the results are analyzed
`discrete samples
`the number of results
`from the discrete samples
`whereby
`to obtain results distinguishing
`will provide data sufficient
`In one aspect,
`difl'erent
`sequences.
`the method
`target
`involves an analysis of a trisomy. In this method, one of the
`target sequences (e. g. chromosome 21) is diploid in
`difl'erent
`in fetal genetic
`and aneuploid
`maternal genetic material
`material and another of the diflerent
`target sequences (e. g.
`chromosome 12) is diploid in both maternal and fetal genetic
`material.
`[0028] The discrete samples are in reaction samples where
`the target sequences can be analyzed. The reaction samples
`may be, for example, wells
`in a microtiter plate, aqueous
`phases in an emulsion, areas in an array surface, or reaction
`in a microfluidic device. The reaction samples
`chambers
`may be used for PCR analysis of the discrete samples. The
`samples are contacted with a plurality of PCR
`discrete
`at least one (or one forward and one
`including
`primers,
`reverse) primer directed specifically
`to a maternal control
`
`sequence, expected to be the same in both mother and fetus.
`PCR primers
`are also directed
`to a fetal
`specifically
`sequence, i. e. one which may be present in both mother and
`fetus, but is amplified or altered in the fetus. PCR amplifi-
`cation will allow detection of these two difl'erent sequences,
`there will be a
`and, according
`to the present method,
`in the case of an abnormal
`fetal target sequence.
`difl'erential
`The PCR method may be (but is not necessarily) quantita-
`real time PCR, which includes hybridizing
`tive. Quantitative
`target sequences with a nucleic acid having a fluorescent
`label, may be used. A fluorescent probe hybridizing
`to the
`target sequence may also be used. A number of "digital
`PCR" protocols are known
`for this purpose, as well as
`bead-based or emulsion PCR. While florescent probes are
`to provide
`and may be used
`readily available
`sensitive
`results, e. g. , in FRET combinations,
`tech-
`other
`labeling
`niques may be used.
`[0029] The number of discrete samples
`is chosen accord-
`ing to the results desired. In one aspect, it is preferred
`that
`a high degree of statistical significance
`is obtained, and the
`number of samples
`is at least about 10, 000. In order to
`to employ
`statistical confidence,
`it is preferable
`improve
`large numbers of reactions, preferably between 500 and
`100, 000, more preferably between 10, 000 and 100, 000 or
`more reactions, depending on the percentage of fetal DNA
`in the mixture. The results to be obtained should be
`present
`for purposes of the analysis con-
`statistically
`significant
`ducted, e. g. initial
`etc. A
`diagnosis,
`screening, primary
`commonly used measure of statistical significance when a
`is p&0. 01, i. e. , a 99%
`is desired
`result
`significant
`highly
`interval based on a chi-square or t-test.
`confidence
`[0030] However, as shown below, results can be obtained
`with less, e. g. on the order of about 500 samples, placed in
`separate reaction samples. Fewer discrete samples may be
`is present
`in a higher
`the genetic material
`analyzed where
`in the mixture. The mixture may be enriched
`concentration
`for fetal genetic material. One method
`to enrich plasma
`DNA for fetal DNA is size separation, whereby a preparation
`less than about 300 bp are
`comprising only DNA fragments
`used for measuring
`target sequences.
`[0031] A variety of genetic abnormalities may be detected
`including known alter-
`to the present method,
`according
`ations in one or more of the genes: CFTR, Factor VIII (F8
`gene), beta globin, hemachromatosis, G6PD, neurofibroma-
`and pyruvate kinase. The
`tosis, GAPDH, beta amyloid,
`sequences and common mutations of these genes are known.
`Other genetic abnormalities may be detected, such as those
`involving a sequence which is deleted in a human chromo-
`some, is moved in a translocation or inversion, or is dupli-
`cated in a chromosome duplication, wherein said sequence
`is characterized
`in a known genetic disorder
`in the fetal
`genetic material not present in the maternal genetic material.
`For example chromosome
`trisomies may
`include partial,
`mosaic, ring, 18, 14, 13, 8, 6, 4 etc. A listing of known
`abnormalities may be found
`in the OMIM Morbid map,
`http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/Omim/getmorb
`id. cgi.
`[0032]
`In general, the term "aneuploidy"
`is used to refer to
`the occurrence of one or more extra or missing chromo-
`somes.
`[0033] In one aspect, the present method of difl'erential
`detection of target sequences may involve direct sequencing
`of target sequences
`the genetic material. Single molecule
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 9
`
`

`

`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`Aug. 30, 2007
`
`is further described below. The
`as is known,
`sequencing,
`method may also comprise sequencing of amplified deriva-
`tives of the target sequences clones or amplicons of the
`in a discrete
`genetic material. That is, a target sequence
`is amplified by PCR, i. e. as an amplicon, or cloned
`sample
`into a vector that
`is grown up and thereby amplified by
`obtaining multiple copies of the vector insert.
`[0034]
`In another aspect, the present
`invention comprises
`materials selected and combined for carrying out the present
`methods. Thus is provided a kit for differential detection of
`in maternal and fetal DNA in a mixed DNA
`target sequences
`sample, comprising primers specific for a genetically abnor-
`mal sequence and a control sequence, such as two chromo-
`somes, one of which is possibly aneuploid and one of which
`is presumed diploid; a PCR reaction bufl'er for forming a
`PCR reaction sample with the primers
`in a device having
`separate reaction samples; and a size separation medium for
`into a fraction having
`the DNA sample
`less than
`separating
`about 1000 bp. The size separation medium may be gel or
`for recovering
`smaller DNA frag-
`centrifugation material
`fetal DNA. The kit may further
`ments and thus enriching
`comprise a pair of primers specific to chromosome 21. The
`kit may further comprise the device having separate reaction
`samples for discrete samples. The device may be a microf-
`luidic device or a microtiter plate having at least 1, 000
`discrete reaction samples.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`illustration of the present
`[0035] FIG. 1 is a schematic
`analytical method, showing distribution of genetic material
`(IA), chromosome peaks of diflerent
`into compartments
`height (IB), and statistical analysis of chromosomes
`(IC);
`[0036] FIG. 2 is a photograph of a microfluidic
`chip
`(numbered 1-12) containing DNA with
`having 12 panels
`chromosome 21 labeled;
`[0037] FIG. 3 is a photograph of a microfluidic
`chip
`(numbered 1-12) containing DNA with
`having 12 panels
`chromosome 12 labeled; and
`[0038] FIG. 4 is a graph showing results from experiments
`done using digital analysis of mixed normal and trisomic
`trisomy 21) DNA.
`(Down Syndrome,
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`
`Outline
`[0039] I. Overview
`[0040] II. Description of Steps
`[0041] A. Tissue Preparation
`[0042] B. Distribution of DNA molecules
`[0043] C. Detection and Quantification
`[0044] 1. Digital PCR Methods
`[0045] 2. Bead emulsion PCR
`[0046] 3. Microfluidic Dilution with PCR
`[0047] 4. Single molecule detection and/or sequenc-
`ing
`
`[0048] D. Quantitative Evaluation
`
`[0049] III. Specific applications
`
`[0050] A. Preparation for trisomy with frequency analy-
`sts.
`
`[0051] B Sample Protocol
`
`[0052]
`
`IV. Examples
`
`I. OVERVIEW
`[0053] The methods and materials described below apply
`for analyzing numerous nucleic acids contained
`techniques
`in a tissue sample
`serum or, more preferably,
`(preferably
`plasma) containing a mixture of DNA from both the mother
`and the fetus, and allowing detection of small but statisti-
`cally significant diflerences.
`the analysis of
`[0054] The present
`involves
`invention
`maternal blood for a genetic condition, wherein
`the mixed
`fetal and maternal DNA in the maternal blood is analyzed
`to
`distinguish a fetal mutation or genetic abnormality
`from the
`background of the maternal DNA. It has been found that,
`using a combination of steps, a DNA sample containing
`DNA from both the mother and the fetus can be analyzed
`to
`distinguish a genetic condition present in a minor fraction of
`the fetal DNA. The method
`the DNA, which represents
`employs "digital analysis, " in which the DNA in the sample
`is isolated to a nominal
`single target molecule
`in a small
`reaction volume. Each sample mixture has a possibility of
`in it less than I target (ke. , 0 target) or
`having distributed
`more than one target. Next, the target molecules are detected
`in each reaction well, preferably as target sequences which
`are amplified, which may include a quantization of starting
`copy number of the target sequence,
`that is, 0, I, 2, 3, etc.
`A control
`to distinguish
`is used
`an abnormal
`sequence
`increase in the target sequence, e. g. , a trisonomy. Thus there
`is a difl'erential detection of target sequences, one of which
`is chosen to represent a normal genotype present
`in both
`and one of which
`is chosen for
`mother and ofl'spring,
`detection of an abnormal genotype
`in the ofl'spring, where
`in the ofl'spring will be diflerent
`from
`the target sequence
`that of the mother, e. g. in trisomy.
`[0055] FIG. 1A illustrates an embodiment where quanti-
`tative detection, e. g. quantitative
`real time PCR, is used.
`Blood 10 is processed to obtain plasma DNA 12, which is
`into aliquots 14. These are added to
`diluted and distributed
`IA through 5D. Shown
`in the wells are
`reactions wells
`targets representing chromosomes 21 and 22. In well 2A, no
`target DNA is found; some wells (not shown) may have
`excess DNA. In well 3B, fetal DNA having
`trisomy 21
`is found. The remainder of the wells
`(Down Syndrome)
`contains maternal DNA. The DNA
`is amplified
`and/or
`is obtained, as shown at
`labeled and a quantitative
`readout
`16. Peak 18 representing well 3B will be 50% higher
`than
`the peaks from the other well, or the peaks from a reference
`sequence on chromosome 22. Well A2, lacking either 21 or
`22, will have no peak. The peaks are shown at 20. A single
`such as wells
`run will have numerous
`random variations,
`that have no target sequence, or have duplication
`through
`sample variability. Also, samples with no target will clearly
`result in no peak at all; wells with two or more targets, will
`give peaks significantly higher than peak 18, i. e. , 2x or 2. 5x
`controls. These results are distinguished by running a mul-
`titude of reactions, followed by statistical analysis
`that can
`from true results.
`discriminate
`random variations
`
`Ariosa Exhibit 1006, p. 10
`
`

`

`US 2007/0202525 A1
`
`Aug. 30, 2007
`
`[0056] FIG. 1C illustrates an embodiment where the DNA
`in a more dilute fashion (less than I, or about
`is distributed
`one half genome equivalents per well). In this case chro-
`mosome 21 labels (primers) will generate more positives
`than chromosome 22 (a diploid chromosome) specific labels
`(e. g. , primers) due simply to the slightly greater abundance
`of chromosome
`21 in a trisomy-containing
`sample. As
`shown, some wells will contain positives 20 for both chro-
`mosomes, some will contain negatives 22 for both chromo-
`somes, but some will contain blanks 24 for the diploid
`chromosome and peaks for the trisomic chromosome, due to
`its greater abundance. The data from a higher peak 18 is not
`used in this mode. As explained below, this slight difl'erence
`can be made statistically
`significant by examining a large
`number of wells, and by the sensitivity of the present method
`to a single molecule.
`
`the
`
`[0057] Thus, the present method comprises generally
`following steps:
`[0058] 1. Obtaining
`a tissue containing DNA from a
`to have about 3%
`subject, which DNA is known
`pregnant
`fetal DNA. This material
`is preferably drawn blood, and the
`circulating DNA is found in the blood plasma, rather than in
`cells. The blood or plasma may optionally be enriched for
`to
`fetal DNA by known methods, such as size fractionation
`less than about 300 bp. Alterna-
`select for DNA fragments
`tively, maternal DNA, which tends to be larger than about
`500 bp may be excluded. Another enrichment
`step may be
`to treat the blood sample with formaldehyde,
`as described in
`Dhallan et al. "Methods to Increase the Percentage of Free
`Fetal DNA Recovered From the Maternal Circulation, " J.
`Am. Med. Soc. 291(9): 1114-1119 (March 2004).
`[0059] 2. Distributing
`single DNA molecules
`from this
`sample to a number of discrete reaction samples, where the
`number of reaction samples
`is selected to give a statistically
`significant result for the number of copies of a target in the
`the reaction sample is confined to
`DNA molecules. Further,
`into close
`to bring the reaction molecules
`a small volume
`approximation. The amount of DNA molecule per reaction
`on the order of one copy of the
`is preferably
`sample
`chromosome of interest equivalent per reaction sample.
`[0060] 3. Detecting the presence of the target in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket