throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Snow et al.
`
`illllllllllllllilllllilllllllllllilllllllllllllillllillllllllllllilllllllll
`5,537,327
`Jul. 16, 1996
`
`USOO5537327A
`Patent Number:
`Date of Patent:
`
`[11]
`
`[45]
`
`[54]
`
`METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR
`DETECTING HIGH-IMPEDANCE FAULTS IN
`ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
`
`[75] Inventors: Peter B. Snow, Colorado Springs,
`Colo.; Alexander P. Apostolov;
`Jefferson D. Bronfeld, both of
`Binghamton, NY.
`
`[73]
`
`Assignee:
`
`New York State Electric & Gas
`Corporation, Binghamton, NY.
`
`[21]
`[22]
`[51]
`[52]
`
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`Appl. No.2 141,308
`Filed:
`Oct. 22, 1993
`
`Int. Cl.6 .......................... .. G06F 15/22; GOlR 31/08
`US. Cl. ........................ .. 364/483; 364/481; 364/482;
`395/50; 395/21; 395/22; 395/23; 395/907;
`361/91; 361/92; 361/93
`Field of Search ................................... .. 364/483, 482,
`364/481, 492; 361/93, 76, 30, 91-92; 324/508,
`509; 395/907, 915, 21-23, 50, 54, 75, 77
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUIVIENTS
`
`4,617,636 10/1986 Johns et a1. ........................... .. 364/482
`5,390,106
`2/1995 Cederblad et a1. ..................... .. 361/90
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Fernando; “High impedance fault detection using arti?cial
`neural network techniques”; IEEE; 6 vol. 2870 p. l, 1992
`(full text).
`Sarosh; “Toast: The Power System Operator’s Assistant”;
`IEEE; Jul. 1986, pp. 53-59.
`
`Abstract Title: “High Impedance fault detection using arti
`?cial nerual network techniques”, Society of Automotive
`Eng. 1992 vol. 2870 pp.
`S. Ebron et al. “A Nerual Network approach to the Detection
`of Incipient faults on power distribution feeders”, paper No.
`89 TD 377-3 PWRD.
`
`Primary Examiner-Emanuel T. Voeltz
`Assistant Examiner-Kamim' Shah
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Salzman & Levy
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The present invention features a method and apparatus for
`detecting and enabling the clearance of high impedance
`faults (HIFs) in an electrical transmission or distribution
`system. Current in at least one phase in a distribution system
`is monitored in real time by sensors. Analog current signa
`ture information is then digitized for processing by a digital
`computer. Zero crossings are identi?ed and current maxima
`and minima located. The ?rst derivatives of the maxima and
`rninima are computed and a modi?ed Fast Fourier Trans
`form (FPT) is then performed to convert time domain to
`frequency domain information. The transformed data is
`formatted and normalized and then applied to a trained
`neural network, which provides an output trigger signal
`when an HIF condition is probable. The trigger signal is
`made available to either a network administrator for manual
`intervention, or directly to switchgear to deactivate an
`aifected portion of the network. The inventive method may
`be practiced using either conventional computer hardware
`and software or dedicated custom hardware such as a VLSI
`chip.
`
`32 Claims, 6 Drawing Sheets
`
`i
`
`Accept Dcto
`
`5°
`
`1
`second Of (1010
`collected?
`
`Loccte zero crossing .__ .52
`points, ?nd maximum
`and minimum currents
`i
`take tirsi derivative
`of maximum and
`minimum currents
`
`i
`
`Periorrn FFT on
`iirst derivatives
`
`~56
`
`i
`
`Compuie power
`55
`spectrum for positive
`and negative currents /
`i
`Sum positive and
`50
`power /
`spectra
`1
`Average sums 0i
`positive and negative /
`power spectra
`
`64
`
`1
`
`NOITHOIIZG end lOi'mOi
`dOtO; OLtiDU‘l t0 ANN
`
`Terminate processi !
`
`i—
`
`AVS EXHIBIT 2004
`Toyota Inc. v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC
`IPR2013-00424
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 16, 1996 I
`
`Sheet 1 of6
`
`5,537,327
`
`QA
`
`QB
`
`QC
`
`12a
`
`16
`
`20
`
`18
`
`Data
`
`Pre
`
`Processor
`
`ND
`
`Converter
`
`'\/14b
`
`Trained
`ANN
`
`1
`22
`
`/_\\_/ AV hv
`
`gig wza 7
`
`24
`Fault
`Indicating j
`Output
`
`7
`
`Visua| or
`Audi°
`Indicating
`H Device
`25a
`
`Other
`_ Indicating
`'
`or
`
`Recording
`r" Device
`25b
`
`Remotely
`Trippable
`Circuit
`f‘)
`Breaker
`250
`
`25d
`\ oth-er
`Electrically
`Actuatable
`Fault Clearing
`Device
`
`V
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 16, 1996
`
`Sheet 2 0f 6
`
`5,537,327
`
`(
`
`Start Pre-process )
`
`4
`
`Accept Data
`
`~50
`
`1
`second of data
`collected?
`
`Locate zero crossing
`points, find maximum
`and minimum currents
`
`V
`
`Take first derivative
`of maximum and N54
`minimum currents
`
`1
`
`Perform FFT on N56
`first derivatives
`l
`Compute power
`58
`spectrum for positive
`and negative currents /
`
`7
`
`Sum positive and
`negative power
`spectra
`
`60
`
`62
`Average sums of /
`positive and negative
`power spectra
`
`64
`v /
`Normalize and format
`data; output to ANN
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 16, 1996
`
`Sheet 3 0f 6
`
`5,537,327
`
`% HlZPROC
`% Developed by Dr. Peter B. Snow for NYSEG March 9, 1993
`% enter a file for processing - for example \ksc\hiz42_3.dat
`% now put the file in vector a - for example a = hiz42_3
`% now type in hizproc to activate this processing program
`% clear the old matrices
`clear b cl c2;
`% first get the size of the input vector
`[id, ja] = size(a);
`% now shift the signal to the origin y=0
`avg1 = mean(a);
`a = a - avg1;
`%now find the element numbers of the zero current crossings
`k = 1;
`for i=1zjd-1;
`if a(i) < 0.0;
`if a(i+1) > 0.0;
`b(k) = i;
`k = k + 1;
`end;
`end;
`end;
`[id, ja] = size(b);
`k = 1;
`% now find maximum values for each cycle
`for i = 1:ja-1;
`i1 = W):
`12 = b(i+1);
`
`k = k + 1
`end;
`% now take first derivative of max, min vectors
`e1 = diff(c1);
`e2 = diff(c2);
`% now take the FFT and convert to power spectrum
`91 = fl't(e1, 512);
`92 = fft(e2, 512);
`pg1 = Q1 .*c0nj(g1)/512;
`pg2 = Q2 .*conj(g2) / 512;
`sumfft1 ='sum(pg1);
`sumfit2 = sum(pg2);
`sumfft = ( sumfft1 + sumfft2 ) / 2;
`
`gig was 3
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 16, 1996
`
`Sheet 4 of 6
`
`5,537,327
`
`32
`
`N0
`
`Micro
`
`Converter
`
`Processor
`
`Fault
`Indicating
`Output
`
`24
`
`Visual or
`Audio
`Indicating
`
`_ / Device
`25a
`
`Other
`_ Indicating
`'
`or
`
`Recording
`r.)
`Device
`
`Remotely
`Trippable
`Circuit
`Breaker
`
`Other
`Electrically
`Actuatable
`Fault Clearing
`Device
`
`gig LL18 4a
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 16, 1996
`
`Sheet 5 0f 6
`
`5,537,327
`
`40
`
`Current -—'—" VLSl
`
`
`
`Input Signals
`
`,
`
`Chip
`
`Fault
`24
`Indicating
`Output /
`
`Visual or
`Audio
`
`~
`
`Indicating
`r4 Device
`25a
`
`Other
`‘ Indicating
`
`,
`
`or
`
`Recording
`f" Device
`25b
`
`Remotely
`, Trippable
`Circuit
`r‘) Breaker
`25c
`
`25d
`\ Other
`Electrically
`
`_ Actuatable
`Fault Clearing
`Device
`
`was 41;
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 16, 1996
`
`Sheet 6 of 6
`
`5,537,327
`
`0.12 l——
`
`0.10 ----~
`
`0.08 ——
`
`0.00-—
`
`0.04 ——
`
`0.02 ——
`
`O
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`U Series1
`[E Series 2
`
`gl?ww 5a
`
`0.60 ——
`
`0.50 ——
`
`0.40 ——
`
`0.30 ——
`
`0.20 ——
`
`0.10 —
`
`E Series 1
`Series 2
`
`I
`
`“15 5LZ
`
`Series 1 = Phase B of 13 kV Line - Dropped on Ice
`Series 2 = Phase B of 13 kV Line
`
`

`
`1
`METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR
`DETECTING HIGH-IMPEDANCE FAULTS IN
`ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
`
`5,537,327
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention pertains to the detection of faults in an
`electrical power system and more particularly, to the detec
`tion of high-impedance faults in power transmission and
`distribution systems caused by downed conductors, tree
`limbs across conductors and the like.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`In the electrical power generation and distribution indus
`try, monitoring transmission and distribution networks for
`fault conditions is very important. The term distribution
`network is used herein to refer to any electrical power
`transmission or distribution facility. Moreover, a fault con
`dition is any abnormal (unexpected) current-conducting path
`in a distribution network. Fault conditions often present
`danger to people and property. They also waste electrical
`energy.
`One type of fault is a bolted (short-circuit) fault of one or
`more legs of a distribution network to another leg thereof or
`to ground. This type of low-impedance (low-Z) fault con
`dition is easily detected by conventional circuit overcurrent
`protective devices such as fuses or circuit breakers. In other
`words, a complete short circuit (a low-impedance path)
`usually trips a circuit breaker or blows a fuse. A circuit of the
`distribution network experiencing such a fault condition is
`quickly removed from service until such time as repairs can
`be effected (i.e., until the fault is cleared).
`Another type of fault condition occurs when an unin
`tended high impedance (high-Z) conductive path occurs
`between transmission line legs or between one leg and
`ground. Such high-Z paths may occur when a tree limb or
`the like falls across a transmission line or when a single leg‘
`of a transmission line breaks (due to ice or wind, for
`example) and touches the ground. Generally, a single con
`ductor of the distribution network dropping to the ground
`will not create a short circuit, but will continue to allow
`current ?ow at a relatively low rate. Such current ?ow often
`causes arcing. This condition presents a great danger of
`electrocution to people or animals happening across the
`downed conductor. The arcing can also result in ?res.
`A problem constantly plaguing the electrical power indus
`try is ?nding an effective way to differentiate between a
`high-Z fault (HIF) condition and similar effects caused by
`changes in the loads attached to the distribution network. In
`addition to load switching events, power factor correcting
`capacitor banks are frequently switched on and off the
`network and transformer taps are automatically changed to
`keep the network voltage constant. Both of these events also
`create conditions on the network which may appear similar
`to an HIF condition. Any effective system for detecting HIFs
`must be able to distinguish fault conditions from normal
`load switching events. A system which ignores legitimate
`HIF conditions risks the aforementioned dangers while a
`system which falsely trips in response to normal load
`switching events can wrack havoc with consumers relying
`on uninterrupted electrical service. Interruption of electrical
`service to certain manufactming processes, for example,
`may destroy work-in-process and result in large expense to
`the manufacturer. An interruption of medical apparatus can
`also be inconvenient at best, and disastrous at worst.
`
`20
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`I-HF detection solutions as simple as lowering the trip
`points of conventional circuit protective devices have been
`tried. Because HIF-drawn current is often a very small
`percentage of the total network current, this solution has
`done nothing more than cause excessive service interrup
`tions. Most H[F research has focused upon the problem of
`?nding detectable differences in measurable parameters in a
`distribution network under HE and normal load switching
`conditions. Some of the parameters measured and compared
`have included phase current, ground current, ratio of ground
`current to positive sequence current, and frequency spec
`tra—both near line frequency (typically 60 Hz.) and at
`higher harmonic relationships to line frequency.
`One system with potential for detecting I-lIFs is disclosed
`in U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,795 issued to Frederick K. Blades,
`titled “Method and Apparatus for Detecting Arcing in Elec
`trical Connections by Monitoring High Frequency Noise”.
`Blades discloses a system wherein high-frequency noise
`caused by arcing is detected and, when measured above a
`pre-programmed threshold level, trips a circuit protective
`device. While the Blades system is intended for residential
`branch circuit uses, it is representative of a class of HIF
`detection strategies relying on high-frequency noise for use
`in power distribution networks. These techniques have not
`proven effective in the detection of HIFs, since noise gen
`erated by HIFs varies widely in both spectrum and intensity.
`In addition, capacitor banks, automatically switched on and
`off the network for power factor correction, tend to short the
`high-frequency noise signals to ground, adding additional
`uncertainty to the detection and analysis process.
`Another approach to HIF detection is taught in U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,216,621 issued to Richard T. Dickens, titled “Line
`Disturbance-Monitor and Recorder System”. Dickens dis
`closes a system comprising analog current and/or voltage
`sensors placed at selected positions in a distribution net
`work. Analog signals from the detectors are digitized by
`analog-to-digital (A/D) converters and presented to a high
`speed digital signal processor (DSP) as digital sample
`words. The DSP computes both the real and imaginary
`phasor components of the operating parameter or param
`eters. These phasor components are then used to calculate
`various measures of power transmission performance
`according to known phasor equations. Trigger means imple
`mented within the DSP provides an output signal when
`pre-programmed limits of a measured or calculated quantity
`are exceeded. Memory in cooperation with the DSP captures
`and stores digital sample words associated with abnormal
`events for future analysis. The Dickens apparatus appears to
`be expensive to build and, even with a state-of-the-art DSP,
`the system may only detect HIFs with well-known charac
`teristics. Each installation on a network may have to be
`individually calibrated to the characteristics of that network
`and, as the loads changed on the network (e.g., by adding or
`removing power customers), the system would have to be
`re-calibrated.
`A third approach to HIF detection is disclosed in U.S. Pat.
`No. 4,878,142 issued to Sten Bergman, et al., titled “High
`Resistance Ground Fault Protection”. Bergman discloses a
`system for analyzing the non-harmoniccomponents of phase
`currents. A, estimate of Fourier coe?icients is computed,
`thereby transforming the time-domain information into the
`frequency domain. Both the original digitized signals and
`the transformed frequency domain signals are applied to
`detection circuitry. Logical decisions based on comparison
`to known fault parameters are made and a fault-indicating
`trip signal is provided when appropriate. The Bergman
`system suffers from many of the same shortcomings as the
`
`

`
`3
`aforementioned Dickens system. The Bergman system must
`be calibrated to each network and re-calibrated when the
`load pro?le on the network changes.
`Yet a fourth HIF detection system is described in “A
`Neural Network Approach to the Detection of Incipient
`Faults on Power Distribution Feeders”, paper No. 89 TD
`377-3 PWRD, S. Ebron, D. Lubkemen and M. White (1989).
`That HIF detection system relies on the monitoring, digiti
`zation, and comparison of voltage and current conditions in
`the distribution network. The mechanism for deciding
`whether an event is an HIF or a normal load switching event
`is a partially or fully-trained neural network. The 200-node
`neural network described by Ebron et a1. is trained using
`data obtained from a computer-simulated distribution net
`work using the Electromagnetic Transients Program
`(EMTP) by Systems Control, Inc. Data is collected for ten
`cycles (two subsequent zero-crossings going from negative
`to positive) of simulated operation. Digitized data is pre
`processed to extract features such as peak transient current
`over three phases, and phase currents immediately before
`and after the occurrence of a detected transient. The
`extracted feature vector representing ten cycles of simulated
`network operation is then applied to a neural network. The
`network, once at least partially trained, then identi?es pat~
`terns in the data as either HIF or normal load switch events.
`A trigger signal can be generated when an HIF is detected.
`It is therefore an object of the present invention is to
`provide a method and apparatus for monitoring an electrical
`power distribution network and for distinguishing HIF con
`ditions from normal load, capacitor bank or transformer tap
`switching conditions with extremely high accuracy.
`It is a further object of the invention to produce a system
`self-adaptable to a variety of networks and one that need not
`be calibrated for changes in load on the network.
`It is still a further object of the invention to provide a
`self~contained, low-cost, single-chip hardware implementa
`tion of the inventive method for use either as a standalone
`HIF monitor, or as an integral part of a circuit-interrupting
`device for completely self-contained fault clearing.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the present invention, there is pro
`vided a method and apparatus for detecting and clearing
`high impedance faults (HIFs) in an electrical transmission or
`distribution system. Current in at least one phase in a
`distribution system is monitored in real time by sensors.
`Analog current/voltage signature information is then digi
`tized for processing by a digital computer. Zero crossings are
`identi?ed and current maxima and rninima for each cycle
`located. The ?rst derivatives of the maxima and minima are
`computed and a modi?ed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is
`then performed to convert these time~domain derivatives to
`frequency domain information. The transformed data is
`formatted, summed and normalized and then applied to a
`trained neural network, which provides an output trigger
`signal when an HIF condition is probable. The trigger signal
`is made available to either a network administrator for
`manual intervention, or directly to switchgear to deactivate
`an aifected portion of the network. The inventive method
`may be practiced using either conventional computer hard
`ware and software or dedicated custom hardware such as a
`VLSI chip.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`A complete understanding of the present invention may be
`obtained by reference to the accompanying drawings, when
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,537,327
`
`4
`taken in conjunction with the detailed description thereof
`and in which:
`FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram in accordance with
`the present invention;
`FIG. 2 is a ?ow chart showing the pre-processing steps of
`the method of the present invention;
`FIG. 3 is a program listing of the pre-processing com
`mands;
`FIGS. 4a and 4b show block diagrams of alternate hard
`ware embodiments of the present invention; and
`FIGS. 5a and 512, respectively, show fault detection prob
`ability without and with ?rst derivative calculation.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODlMENT
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`Generally speaking, the invention relates to the ?eld of
`fault detection in electrical power transmission and distri
`bution systems and networks. It should be understood that
`the terms “power distribution network” or “network” are
`hereinafter used to refer to any alternating current electrical
`transmission or distribution system or facility. More speci?
`cally, there is disclosed a system for the identi?cation of
`high-impedance faults (HIFs) which is capable of differen
`tiating with high accuracy fault conditions drawing as small
`a current as 200 mA in a power distribution network. HIF
`conditions may, however, draw currents as high as 700
`amps. The system is applicable to both single-phase and
`poly-phase networks.
`Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown a functional block
`diagram of the present invention. A portion of a typical
`three-phase power distribution network is shown generally
`at reference numeral 10. Phase conductors 12a, 12b and 12c
`of distribution network 10 each are monitored by current
`transformers 14a, 14b and 14c, respectively. Since current
`transformers are well known in the art, it should be noted
`that any current transformer or transducer capable of gen
`erating a low-noise analog signal representative of the
`current may be employed. Typically a Model No. MF1254O
`MF slip-over bushing current transformer manufactured by
`Associated Engineering Corp. could be used. The HIF
`detection system of the present invention could be used
`e?fectively to monitor a single phase network or a single
`phase of a poly-phase distribution network.
`Analog signals representing phase currents from phase
`conductors 12a, 12b, and 12c monitored by current trans
`- formers 14a, 14b and 14c are provided to inputs of an
`analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 16. A/D converter 16 is a
`50
`three or more channel device with 12 bit resolution, typically
`a Model No. DAS-50 manufactured by Keithley Metrobyte.
`Sampling rate is approximately 5 kHz. Digitized represen
`tations of analog phase currents are applied from A/D
`converter 16 to a pre-processor 20 via data bus 18. Pre
`processor 20 performs several mathematical and data for
`matting operations described in more detail hereinbelow.
`Pre-processed data is then applied to the input of a trained
`arti?cial neural network (ANN) 22. An ANN is a computer
`model of the parallelism and interconnectedness of the
`human brain. Connectionist models exist which have the
`ability to derive “rules” by analyzing patterns. The ANN
`differs from more conventional expert systems or general
`arti?cial intelligence approaches in that the latter require the
`existence of well-de?ned rules as a prerequisite for effective
`operation. The training of an ANN is the process whereby
`the ANN learns to associate input states to output states by
`
`

`
`5,537,327
`
`25
`
`5
`adjusting weights and biases. In the training mode, the
`expected or desired outcome based upon the applied data is
`used. If training data covering a broad enough range of
`conditions is provided, the ANN eventually self-develops a
`pattern relating inputs to outputs allowing it to analyze any
`applied unknown data. A trained ANN is therefore highly
`effective at pattern recognition tasks. That is, pattern recog
`nition is accomplished at extremely high speed and with a
`high probability of a correct outcome, based upon the
`applied data.
`'10
`Training the ANN 22 is necessary to establish the “rules”
`or weights to be used to classify events occurring on the
`network as HIFs or normal switching events. Training is
`accomplished by providing multiple sets of known data
`representing both HIF and normal network conditions to the
`ANN 22 along with the correct “answers” corresponding to
`each data set. Data sets my be compiled using computer
`simulation techniques or may consist of actual ?eld-col
`lected data corresponding to_both fault and no-fault condi
`tions of distribution networks.
`Actual ?eld-collected data and superposition combina
`tions of ?eld data were used to train the ANN 22 of the
`present invention. Over 300 sets of ?eld-collected and super
`position data were used for the training. A typical training
`data set consisted of 2860 data points representing 10
`seconds of sampling time on a real or simulated network.
`Digitization frequency was 5000 samples/second. The train
`ing data sets were pre-processed essentially as will be
`described in detail hereinbelow. The backprapogation of
`errors method was the learning technique chosen to train
`ANN 22 of the present invention. A learning rate of 0.05 and
`a momentum (a method of changing weights based on a
`previous weight) of 0.1 were chosen. Once trained (i.e.,
`appropriate weights established), an ANN my be duplicated
`and distributed and applied in its intended application as a
`?xed-weight (non-trainable) ANN.
`In the preferred embodiment, ANN 22 comprises 386
`MATLAB software version 3.5M from Mathworks, Inc.
`operating on an IBM® compatible personal computer under
`the Microsoft® DOS operating system version 5.0 or
`greater.
`ANN 22 continuously analyzes data from pre-processor
`20 and provides an output signal 24 which indicates either
`a normal condition or an HIF. Signal 24 may be used to alert
`a network administrator (not shown) of a potential HIF by
`means of indicating/recording devices 25a and/or 25b.
`Optionally signal 24 may be utilized directly to clear the
`assumed fault by sending a trip signal to a protective circuit
`interrupter 25c or 25d as is well known in the art.
`Refer now also to the ?ow chart of FIG. 2 and also to the
`program listing of FIG. 3, which represents the code applied
`to ANN 22. In learning mode operation, pre-processor 20
`?rst accumulates approximately 5000 digitized current data
`points for each line phase 12a, 12b and 120 being monitored.
`This represents approximately one second of network opera
`tion, step 50. Cycles are identi?ed by their zero-crossing
`points. Zero-crossing points are identi?ed in the data for
`each phase conductor 12a, 12b and 120. This is accom
`plished by calculating when the current crosses from nega
`tive to positive sign. The maximum and minimum current
`for each cycle is determined, step 52. The ?rst derivative
`(i.e, the rate of change with respect to time) of the maximum
`and minimum current values is then taken, step 54.
`It has been found through experimentation with both
`simulated and ?eld recorded data that calculating the ?rst
`derivative is essential to the process of accurately detecting
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`20
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`6
`I-IIFs. For purposes of illustrating the importance of the ?rst
`derivative in detecting a high-impedance fault, refer now
`also to FIGS. 5a and 5b. There are shown bar graphs of ANN
`output (relative value or relative HJF probability) vs. time
`for a 10 second period for an actual H]F condition occurring
`on a single phase of a 13 kV three-phase transmission line
`(not shown). For this fault, the phase B leg of the transmis
`sion line was dropped onto ice. Series 1 data shows the
`faulted condition while Series 2 data shows the line under no
`fault conditions. In FIG. 5a the ?rst derivative has not been
`calculated and, as may be seen, there is little difference in the
`relative value of Series 1 or Series 2 data. In FIG. 5b,
`identical data is plotted. However, the ?rst derivative has
`been calculated, and consequently there is pronounced dif
`ference in the output of the ANN 22 in response to the HIF
`(relative value of the Series 1 data).
`A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is then performed on
`each of the two ?rst derivatives, step 56 (FIG. 2). Next, a
`power spectrum is computed for both positive and negative
`currents, step 58. This is accomplished by taking the product
`of the FFT with its complex conjugate. Total power is
`calculated by summing the power spectrum for the one
`second data window, step 60. The positive and negative
`summed powers are then averaged, step 62. The averaged
`power thus calculated is then formatted and scaled for
`compatibility with the non-linear transfer function of the
`trained ANN 22, step 64. This is accomplished by repre
`senting each one second averaged power as the number of
`standard deviations from the average Z-scaling. The steps
`are repeated continuously, if additional data is processed,
`step 66, starting again with step 50. Processing terminates,
`step 68 when all data has been exhausted.
`Refening to FIGS. 1, 4a and 4b, a fault indicating output
`signal 24 is generated by trained ANN 22 and provided to
`signaling/recording or fault clearing devices 25a, 25b, 25c
`and 25d. These signaling/recording and/or fault clearing
`devices are well known in the art and may be con?gured in
`any suitable combination. A visual indicator or audible
`annunciator 25a are used to alert operating personnel (not
`shown) of the presence of a fault. This fault indication may
`prompt action to clear the fault by manually deenergizing the
`faulted line. A recording device 25b such as a digital fault
`recorder, well known in the art, may also be attached to
`monitor output signal 24. In other installations, a remotely
`trippable circuit breaker 250 or other electrically actuatable
`fault clearing device 25d may operate automatically upon
`receipt of the fault indicating output'signal 24 to clear the
`faulted line.
`Alternate embodiments of the present invention may be
`implemented wherein the entire A/D converter 16, data
`pre-processor 20 and ANN 22 are implemented as a dedi
`cated self-contained device. FIG. 4a shows generally, at
`reference numeral 30, the functions of AID converter 16
`(FIG. 1), data pre-processor 20 andANN 22 all implemented
`using a commercial microprocessor 32, AID chip(s) 34 and
`a commercial EPROM 36 customized with all necessary
`program instructions. FIG. 4b shows an embodiment where
`A/D converter 16, data pre-processor 20 andANN 22 are all
`implemented as a single VLSI chip or equivalent chip shown
`as reference numeral 40.
`In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the
`VLSI or equivalent chip may be packaged as part of a
`fault-clearing or circuit protecting device. Output from the
`I-HF detecting circuit chip would then trip the circuit pro
`tecting device directly.
`In still another embodiment of the present invention, input
`data leading to an HIF determination by the ANN 22 would
`
`

`
`5,537,327
`
`7
`be captured and stored. Such data would then be used either
`to further train other ANN s (not shown) or, in cooperation
`with other analysis software not part of the present inven
`tion, to create a set of heuristic “rules” in a form usable by
`more general expert systems. An expert system (e.g., a
`“fuzzy logic” inference engine) using rules so derived could
`replace the ANN 22 as the HIF decision-making component
`of the present invention.
`Since other modi?cations and changes varied to ?t par
`ticular operating requirements and environments will be
`apparent to those skilled in the art, the invention is not
`considered limited to the example chosen for purposes of
`disclosure, and covers all changes and modi?cations which
`do not constitute departures from the true spirit and scope of
`this invention.
`Having thus described the invention, what is desired to be
`protected by Letters Patent is presented in the subsequent
`appended claims.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line, the steps comprising:
`a) sensing a plurality of cycles of currents attributable to
`a power line and generating a signal representative
`thereof;
`b) computing a ?rst derivative of cycle-to-cycle maxima
`or minima of said current;
`0) transforming said derivatives into a frequency domain
`representation thereof, the power spectrum of which
`frequency domain representation being usable by
`means for processing information;
`d) applying said power spectrum to means for processing
`information using arti?cial intelligence techniques to
`detect a high-impedance fault and to generate a fault
`signal indicative thereof; and
`e) actuating a switch in response to said fault signal.
`2. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 1, wherein said means
`for processing information comprises a neural network.
`3. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 2, wherein said neural
`network is trained by applying signals representative of line
`currents indicative of a high impedance fault.
`4. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 3, wherein said neural
`network training is accomplished by the use of simulated
`data.
`5. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 4, wherein said simu~
`lation is based on superposition of actual data.
`6. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 3, wherein said neural
`network training is accomplished by applying actual data.
`7. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 1, wherein said trans
`forming step (c) further comprises determining an envelope
`based on minimum and maximum signals and processing
`said envelope.
`8. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 1, wherein said actu
`ating step (e) results in operating a circuit clearing device.
`9. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 8, wherein said clearing
`device is a clearing device disposed along said power line.
`10. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 1, wherein said actu
`ating step (e) results in operating an indicating device.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`8
`11. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 1, the steps further
`comprising:
`f) prior to applying said power spectrum to said means for
`processing information, mathematically conditioning
`said power spectrum.
`12. The method for detecting high impedance faults on a
`power line in accordance with claim 11, wherein step (f)
`comprises the steps of:
`i) summing positive and negative power spectra; and
`ii) averaging said sums.
`13. A

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket