throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 7
`Entered: October 15, 2013
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PARALLEL IRON, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00639
`Patent 7,197,662
`____________
`
`Before SCOTT R. BOALICK, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
`SALLY G. LANE, JEFFREY B. ROBERTSON, THOMAS L. GIANNETTI,
`GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, JENNIFER S. BISK, and MIRIAM L.
`QUINN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BISK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2013-000639
`Patent 7,197,662
`
`
`
`On October 2, 2013, a Notice of Filing Date was entered in this proceeding
`
`authorizing the parties to file motions for pro hac vice admission. Paper 4
`(“Notice”). The Notice advised that such motions be filed in accordance with the
`“Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in IPR2013-00010
`(MPT), Paper 6, dated October 15, 2012 (“Prior Order”). Notice 2. The Prior
`Order, however, was issued prior to the publication of the Final Rule adopting new
`Rules of Professional Conduct. See Changes to Representation of Others Before
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 20180
`(Apr. 3, 2013). The Final Rule removes part 10 of title 37, Code of Federal
`Regulations (C.F.R.), referred to in the Prior Order. Prior Order 4. The changes
`set forth in the Final Rule including the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`took effect on May 3, 2013. This order, therefore, updates and supersedes the
`Prior Order.
`
`Section 42.10(c) of 37 C.F.R. provides:
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead
`counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The Board authorizes both parties to file motions for pro hac vice admission
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) as follows:
`
`1. Time for Filing
`The time for filing pro hac vice motions is no sooner than twenty one (21)
`days after service of the petition, which is the time for filing patent owner
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`IPR2013-000639
`Patent 7,197,662
`
`mandatory notices. Parties seeking to oppose a motion for pro hac vice admission
`must file their opposition no later than one week after the filing of the underlying
`motion. No reply to any opposition shall be filed unless authorized by the Board.
`
`2. Content of Motion
`A motion for pro hac vice admission must:
`a. Contain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to
`recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding.
`b. Be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear attesting to the following:
`i. Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least one State or the
`District of Columbia;
`ii. No suspensions or disbarments from practice before any court or
`administrative body;
`iii. No application for admission to practice before any court or
`administrative body ever denied;
`iv. No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`administrative body;
`v. The individual seeking to appear has read and will comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`vi. The individual will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which the individual
`has applied to appear pro hac vice in the last three (3) years; and
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`IPR2013-000639
`Patent 7,197,662
`
`
`c. Where the affiant or declarant is unable to provide any of the information
`requested above in part 2(b) or make any of the required statements or
`representations under oath, the individual should provide a full
`explanation of the circumstances as part of the affidavit or declaration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`cpdocketkiklis@oblon.com
`
`Scott McKeown
`cpdocketmckeown@oblon.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`tarek.fahmi@fseip.com
`
`Amy J. Embert
`amy.embert@fseip.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket