throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 9
`Entered: February 26, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`ABB INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ROY-G-BIV CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00122
`Patent 6,941,543
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, JENNIFER S. BISK, and JEREMY M.
`PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
` JUDGMENT AND FINAL WRITTEN DECISION
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00122
`Patent 6,941,543
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`The petition seeks inter partes review of claims 5-16 of U.S.
`
`Patent 6,941,543. Paper 1. On February 18, 2014, Patent Owner filed a
`
`preliminary response. Paper 6. Patent Owner’s response states that the ʼ543 patent
`
`is set to expire in May 2015. Id. at 2. For this and other reasons, Patent Owner
`
`cancels the claims of the ʼ543 patent challenged in the petition. Id. at 4.
`
`Petitioner requested a conference call with Board to discuss this. A call was
`
`held on February 24, 2014. Respective counsel for the parties and Judges Bisk,
`
`Plenzler, and Giannetti participated.
`
`Patent Owner indicated that in view of the cancellation of all challenged
`
`claims, Patent Owner requests that adverse judgment be entered under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.73(b).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`A party may request entry of adverse judgment against itself at any time
`
`during a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b). Here, Patent Owner has cancelled each
`
`claim for which inter partes review is sought. Paper 6 at 4. Under these
`
`circumstances, the entry of judgment adverse to the Patent Owner and cancellation
`
`of the claims as requested is appropriate.
`
`During the call, Petitioner requested guidance on seeking a refund of the fees
`
`paid to the USPTO. Petitioner is directed to FAQ E7 under Trials - Frequently
`
`Asked Questions on the Board’s web site
`
`(www.uspto.gov/ip/boards/bpai/index.jsp).
`
`Patent Owner’s request for entry of adverse judgment is granted.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`It is, therefore,
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00122
`Patent 6,941,543
`
`
`ORDERED that adverse judgment against the Patent Owner is entered under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b);
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that this constitutes a final written decision under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a); and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that claims 5-16 of U.S. Patent 6,941,543 are hereby
`
`CANCELLED.
`
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00122
`Patent 6,941,543
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Richard D. McLeod
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP
`Email: rick.mcleod@klarquist.com
`
`Steven Auvil
`SQUIRE SANDERS LLP
`Steven.auvil@squiresanders.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Richard T. Black
`FOSTER PEPPER PLLC
`Email: blacr@foster.com
`
`Douglas R. Wilson
`HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH LLP
`Email: dwilson@hpcllp.com
`
`
`
` 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket