`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 53
`Entered: June 30, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RPX CORPORATION
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00171 (Patent 6,502,135)
`Case IPR2014-00172 (Patent 6,502,135)
`Case IPR2014-00173 (Patent 7,490,151)
`Case IPR2014-00174 (Patent 7,921,211)
`Case IPR2014-00175 (Patent 7,921,211)
`Case IPR2014-00176 (Patent 7,418,504)
`Case IPR2014-00177 (Patent 7,418,504)1
`____________
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and STEPHEN C. SIU,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This decision addresses an issue that is identical in each case. We, therefore,
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. Unless
`otherwise authorized, the parties, however, are not authorized to use this heading
`style for any subsequent papers. Record citations herein refer to IPR2014-00171.
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00171 (Patent 6,502,135); Case IPR2014-00172 (Patent 6,502,135);
`Case IPR2014-00173 (Patent 7,490,151); Case IPR2014-00174 (Patent 7,921,211);
`Case IPR2014-00175 (Patent 7,921,211); Case IPR2014-00176 (Patent 7,418,504);
`Case IPR2014-00177 (Patent 7,418,504)
`
`
`
`As discussed during a June 13, 2014 conference call, the decision denying
`
`institution of the inter partes review stated that parties may request jointly that a
`
`redacted version of the decision be issued as the public decision.2 The parties
`
`conferred regarding potential redactions and submitted a proposed redacted version
`
`of the decision. Paper 52.
`
`
`
`The Board has reviewed the proposed redacted decision and holds that it
`
`strikes the appropriate balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a
`
`complete and understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting
`
`sensitive information. Accordingly, the Board enters the redacted decision and
`
`orders that the redacted decision be made available to the public.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 This Order summarizes the conference call. A more complete record may be
`found in the transcript, which is Ex. 1079.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00171 (Patent 6,502,135); Case IPR2014-00172 (Patent 6,502,135);
`Case IPR2014-00173 (Patent 7,490,151); Case IPR2014-00174 (Patent 7,921,211);
`Case IPR2014-00175 (Patent 7,921,211); Case IPR2014-00176 (Patent 7,418,504);
`Case IPR2014-00177 (Patent 7,418,504)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Oliver R. Ashe, Jr.
`ASHE, P.C.
`oashe@ashepc.com
`
`Gregory M. Howison
`HOWISON & ARNOTT, LLP
`ghowison@dalpat.com
`admin@dalpat.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Naveen Modi
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`joseph.palys@finnegan.com
`naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
