`Filed on behalf of: VirnetX Inc.
`By:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0496
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`Filed: July 25, 2014
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`
`
`UPDATED PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`VirnetX Inc., the Patent Owner, provides the following updated mandatory
`
`notices pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is VirnetX Inc.,
`
`the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697 (“the ’697 patent”).
`
`II. Related Matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`A.
`The ’697 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is also at issue in
`
`inter partes review Case IPR2014-00238.
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`B.
`Several patents stemming from the same applications that led to the ’697
`
`patent are or were at issue in the following inter partes review and inter partes
`
`reexamination proceedings:
`
`2
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`Case IPR2013-003481
`
`Case IPR2013-003492
`
`Case IPR2013-003753
`
`Case IPR2014-001714
`
`Case IPR2014-001725
`
`Case IPR2014-005586
`
`Control No. 95/001,679
`
`Control No. 95/001,682
`
`
`1 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`2 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`3 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`4 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`5 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`6 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`Case IPR2013-003547
`
`Case IPR2013-003768
`
`Case IPR2014-001739
`
`Case IPR2014-00610
`
`Control No. 95/001,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,714
`
`
`7 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`8 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`9 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`Case IPR2013-0037710
`
`Case IPR2013-0039311
`
`Case IPR2013-0039412
`
`Case IPR2014-0017613
`
`Case IPR2014-0017714
`
`Case IPR2014-00612
`
`Case IPR2014-00613
`
`Case IPR2014-00614
`
`Control No. 95/001,788
`
`Control No. 95/001,851
`
`
`10 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`11 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`12 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`13 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`14 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2013-0037815
`
`Case IPR2013-0039716
`
`Case IPR2013-0039817
`
`Case IPR2014-0017418
`
`Case IPR2014-0017519
`
`Case IPR2014-00615
`
`Case IPR2014-00616
`
`Case IPR2014-00618
`
`Control No. 95/001,789
`
`Control No. 95/001,856
`
`
`15 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`16 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`17 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`18 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`19 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759
`
`Control No. 95/001,746
`
`Control No. 95/001,792
`
`Case IPR2014-0040120
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180
`
`Case IPR2014-0040521
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,987,274
`
`Case IPR2014-00481
`
`Case IPR2014-00482
`
`Case IPR2014-00403
`
`Case IPR2014-00404
`
`Case IPR2014-00483
`
`Case IPR2014-00484
`
`Control No. 95/001,949
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181
`
`Case IPR2014-00485
`
`Case IPR2014-00486
`
`
`20 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014.
`
`21 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014.
`
`7
`
`
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`The following applications, which stem from the same applications that led
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`to the ’697 patent, are currently pending before the Office:
`
`11/839,937
`
`13/080,680
`
`13/181,041
`
`13/285,962
`
`13/475,637
`
`13/615,536
`
`13/615,557
`
`13/617,375
`
`13/617,446
`
`13/620,534
`
`13/890,206
`
`13/903,788
`
`13/911,792
`
`13/911,813
`
`13/950,877
`
`13/950,919
`
`13/615,528
`
`13/620,550
`
`13/950,897
`
`--
`
`8
`
`
`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’697 patent and/or other patents that stem from the same applications
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`that led to the ’697 patent are at issue in the following cases:
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Aastra USA, Inc.,
`
`Aastra Technologies Ltd., NEC Corp., and NEC Corp.
`
`of America, No. 6:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex.)22
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00563 (E.D.
`
`Tex.; consolidated with case No. 6:12-cv-00855)
`
`
`22 NEC and Aastra have entered into a license agreement with VirnetX and
`
`have been dismissed from this case. The Cisco portion of the case has concluded
`
`with a final judgment. The only remaining defendant in this case is Apple. The
`
`district court entered judgment in favor of VirnetX against Apple, and Apple has
`
`appealed that judgment to the Federal Circuit.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6: 13-cv-0021 1 (ED. Tex.)
`
`Microsoft Co;p., No. 6: l3-cv—00351 (ED. Tex.)
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`III. Lead and Back-Up Counsel and Service Information
`
`In accordance with 37 CPR. §42_8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`identifies the following lead and back-up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No. 46,508)
`
`Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224)
`
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`875 15‘'1 Street NW
`
`875 15‘h Street NW
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551—0496
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`Jason B. Stach (Reg. No. 54,464)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`E-mail: jason.stach@fmnegan.com
`
`303 Peachtree St., NE, Suite 3500
`
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`
`Telephone: (404) 653-6428
`
`Facsimile: (404) 653-6444
`
`Dated: July 25, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph E. Palys/
`By:
`Joseph E- Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`1]
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`Certificate of Service
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Updated Patent
`
`Owner’s Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 by electronic means on
`
`July 25, 2014 at the following address of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Dated: July 25, 2014
`
`