throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 37
`
`Entered: February 2, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00237 (Patent 8,504,697)
`Case IPR2014-00238 (Patent 8,504,697)1
`____________
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and STEPHEN C. SIU,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
` 35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(10)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This decision addresses an issue that is identical in each case. We, therefore,
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. Unless
`otherwise authorized, the parties, however, are not authorized to use this style
`heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-00237 (Patent 8,504,697); Case IPR2014-00238 (Patent 8,504,697)
`
`Petitioner requests that the Board hold a hearing and Patent Owner requests
`
`participation in the hearing the same extent as Petitioner. The requests are granted.
`There is substantial overlap in the issues raised in the two cases. Accordingly,
`each party will have sixty (60) minutes total time to present arguments. Petitioner
`will proceed first to present its case with respect to the challenged claims and
`grounds for which the Board instituted trial in IPR2014-00237 and -00238.
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation. Both parties
`may reserve some of their argument time for closing arguments.
`
`The hearing for these cases will commence at 2:00 PM Eastern Time, on
`February 9, 2015, and it will be open to the public for in-person attendance, on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-
`person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come first-served basis. The
`Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s transcript will
`constitute the official record of the hearing.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served five
`business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed at the Board two business
`days prior to the hearing, and the parties must initiate a conference call with the
`Board by two business days prior to the hearing to resolve any dispute over the
`propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits. Any dispute over the propriety of
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented two business days prior to the
`hearing will be considered waived. The parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc.
`v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, Paper 118 (October 23,
`2013), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made
`5 days in advance of the hearing date. The request is to be sent to
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-00237 (Patent 8,504,697); Case IPR2014-00238 (Patent 8,504,697)
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received timely, the equipment may not be
`available on the day of the hearing.
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced
`during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at hearing,
`although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part.
`If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the Board should be
`notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than two days prior to the
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-00237 (Patent 8,504,697); Case IPR2014-00238 (Patent 8,504,697)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Joseph A. Micallef
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jkushan@sidley.com
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Naveen Modi
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`naveen.modi@paulhastings.com
`
`Jason E. Stach
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`jason.stach@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket