throbber
OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`1. One or more
`computer-readable non-
`transitory storage media
`embodying software
`operable when executed
`to:
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`Multiple web pages on Fingerhut’s website1 implement and/or include one or more computer-readable
`non-transitory storage media embodying software. For example, the home page for the Fingerhut website,
`which may be accessed and displayed on a web browser at a user’s computer system, includes a
`“Feedback” icon powered by Qualtrics Labs (Qualtrics) feedback solutions that enable Qualtrics Comment
`Cards. The Qualtrics feedback solutions including Comment Cards allow for users that access
`Fingerhut.com to submit various types of page-specific feedback (such as ratings and comments)
`concerning the particular web page by selecting the “Feedback” icon, an example of which is identified
`below.2
`
`
`
`1 These infringement contentions use the Fingerhut website only as an example and similarly apply to Qualtrics’ feedback solutions, products, and services and
`associated comment cards (including, but not limited to, Qualtrics’ Research Suite and Site Intercept solutions, products, and services) that are utilized on or in
`connection with websites of Qualtrics and/or Qualtrics Customer websites, including Kmart (kmart.com), Move.com (move.com), and Sears (sears.com), which
`are substantially similar implementations.
`2 The identification and illustration of particular portions of web pages are offered by example only and should not be limiting in any way. OpinionLab reserves
`the right to amend, and/or supplement these contentions as may be appropriate.
`
`Fingerhut.com
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`provide a user-selectable
`element viewable on
`each of a plurality of
`particular web pages of a
`website upon initial
`display of a particular
`web page and soliciting
`page-specific user
`feedback concerning the
`particular web page
`upon initial display of
`the particular web page,
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`Most, if not all, web pages on the Fingerhut website implementing Qualtrics feedback solutions including
`Comment Cards include a “user-selectable element” that is viewable on each of a plurality of particular
`web pages of the website (e.g., such as the Fingerhut home page from fingerhut.com) and solicits page-
`specific user feedback concerning the particular web page upon initial display of the particular web page.
`
`For example, multiple web pages on the Fingerhut website (such as the Fingerhut home page) include a
`“Feedback” icon (i.e., the “user-selectable element”), an example of which is identified below. When the
`user navigates to and accesses the Fingerhut.com home page (or other particular web page), the
`“Feedback” icon is viewable upon initial display of the web page. This icon solicits page-specific user
`feedback, such as subjective ratings and/or open-ended comments, concerning a particular web page from
`each user accessing the web page. This is ultimately accomplished via the mechanism explained further
`below by which the user provides and submits such page-specific user feedback concerning the particular
`web page. Indeed, users familiar with this feedback collection system know from experience that they
`must first select the icon to provide the page-specific user feedback, such as through subjective rating
`and/or open-ended comments, concerning the particular web page. The solicitation occurs automatically
`upon the user navigating to and accessing the Fingerhut.com home page (or other particular web page),
`and the user need not provide input.
`
`
`Page 2 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Fingerhut.com.
`
`A more detailed image of this “Feedback” icon is shown below, soliciting the customer to “Rate This
`Page.”
`
`
`
`
`
`Fingerhut.com Feedback Icon
`
`Upon user selection of the “Feedback” icon, the Qualtrics Comment Card is displayed to the user. The
`Comment Card shown below allows the user to provide page-specific user feedback concerning the
`
`Page 3 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`particular web page. For instance, the “Page Ratings” section of the Comment Card allows the user to
`provide feedback in the form of one or more ratings based upon the user’s perceived impressions of the
`particular web page as a whole. The “Overall” rating allows the user to provide a page-specific subjective
`rating of the particular web page as a whole, and each of the “Product Information,” “Look and Feel,” and
`“Ease of Use” ratings allows the user to rate at least one characteristic of the particular web page as a
`whole. Each of these numerical rating scales allows the user to rate the particular web page as a whole
`using a one to five (1-5) scale with at least one positive, neutral, and negative rating.
`
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`Further, the “Comments about this page” text box of the Comment Card shown below allows the user to
`provide open-ended comments concerning the particular web page without any limitation as to substance.
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`The associated text (e.g., “Page Ratings,” “Comments about this page,” and “Please take a moment to rate
`this page”) confirms that any entered subjective ratings or comments may concern the particular web page.
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`It is also clear that the Qualtrics feedback solutions including Comment Cards operate on a page-specific
`basis, even where the Comment Card does not explicitly confirm that any entered feedback concerns the
`particular web page, because, for example, in order to request a Comment Card, the system constructs the
`Comment Card’s URL to include a “PageURL” component. As such, this component embedded within
`the URL is one method for later associating the particular web page with any feedback concerning that
`particular web page for analytics, reporting, or other purposes. For example, when fingerhut.com is the
`particular web page for feedback, the URL appears as:
`“PageURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fingerhut.com%2F”.3
`
`As can be seen from the source code of the Qualtrics Comment Card below, the particular web page,
`
`3 The full URL for the fingerhut.com Comment Card is: http://bluestembrands.az1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_41le6U2PrJjvJad&Pagetype=site+section&
`PageURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fingerhut.com%2F&Timeonsite=0%7C0&CustomerID=undefined&pagecount=4.
`
`Page 6 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`identified by the “Referer” label, is also embedded within the Qualtrics Comment Card itself.
`
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com – Source Code
`
`
`Qualtrics’ Customer Support pages on its website confirm that the particular web page is embedded and
`included with the Comment Card to be utilized with feedback concerning the particular web page:
`
`
`
`
`. . .
`
`
`
`Excerpted from Qualtrics, “Embedded Data,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/advanced-building/survey-flow/embedded-data/
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`Excerpted from Qualtrics, “Embedded Data,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/site-
`intercept/intercepts/intercept-options/embedded-data/
`
`See also Qualtrics, “Feedback Link,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/site-
`intercept/creatives/passive-creatives/feedback-link/ (“Add Embedded Data to the Intercept to track which
`page the visitor was on when they clicked the Feedback Link. For more information refer to the Embedded
`Data page.”).
`
`In addition, this page-specificity of the feedback is apparent because it is provided in response to the user
`navigating to and accessing a particular web page and then subsequently selecting the “Feedback” icon to
`trigger the Comment Card concerning that particular web page. Moreover, independent of any user
`
`Page 8 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`knowledge of the page-specific nature of the feedback, the Qualtrics feedback solutions including
`Comment Cards system ultimately collects, analyzes, and reports all feedback as it concerns the particular
`web page regardless of whether the user explicitly identifies the feedback as concerning the particular web
`page.
`
`Qualtrics confirms that its feedback solutions allow end-users to provide user feedback, for example:
` “Receiving website feedback is easy with the Feedback Link. This allows you to know what your
`website visitors are thinking and improve their experience.” Qualtrics, “Website Feedback,”
`available at http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/distributing/more-distribution-
`methods/website-feedback/.
` “The Feedback Link collects visitor’s opinions of your website. . . . Because a Feedback Link is
`passive, it may attract extreme viewpoints in the survey results – people who actively seek out a
`way to provide feedback because they either had an exceptionally positive or an exceptionally
`negative experience. . . . In general the Feedback Link is appropriate for collecting reactive website
`feedback.” Qualtrics, “Feedback Link,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/site-
`intercept/creatives/passive-creatives/feedback-link/.
` “The Matrix Table allows you to ask many multiple choice questions that use the same answer
`choice scale. . . . Likert: Allows you to place a scale of choices across the top.” Qualtrics, “Basic
`Building - Question Types Guide,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/basic-
`building/editing-questions/question-types-guide/.
` “Text Entry questions allow respondents to type in verbatim responses, such as comments and
`contact information.” Qualtrics, “Basic Building - Question Types Guide,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/basic-building/editing-questions/question-types-guide/.
` “Businesses adopt the platform to gather insights and deliver content based specifically on
`customer feedback. This data informs the development of website functionality and usability
`enhancements.” Qualtrics, “Qualtrics Site Intercept Adoption Skyrockets, Growing Nearly 200
`Percent” (Aug. 22, 2013), available at http://qualtrics.com/press/press-releases/qualtrics-site-
`intercept-adoption-skyrockets-growing-nearly-200-percent/.
` “Feedback: The web shouldn’t be a one-way form of communication. Know what your visitors are
`thinking by providing them with a place to talk to you. You can even link to a Qualtrics survey. In
`fact, we recommend it.” Qualtrics, “Site Intercept,” available at http://qualtrics.com/site-intercept/.
`
`Page 9 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`the user-selectable
`element appearing
`identically and behaving
`consistently on each of
`the plurality of particular
`web pages; and
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
` “Feedback: Whether you use the built-in feedback creative or not, gathering accurate information
`for your visitors to improve their experience is crucial. It’s hard to have direction without
`information, and Site Intercept makes it easy.” Qualtrics, “Site Intercept,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/site-intercept/.
`
`
`OpinionLab contends that this element is literally present. However, to the extent that the element is found
`to not be literally present, OpinionLab contends that, as demonstrated above, the elements are present
`under the doctrine of equivalents because the Qualtrics feedback solutions including comment cards found
`on Fingerhut web pages have at most insubstantial differences as compared to this element and/or perform
`substantially the same function in substantially the same way to yield substantially the same result as this
`element.
`
`This element, as applied and shown above as to the Fingerhut website, similarly applies to additional
`Qualtrics Customer websites, including Kmart (kmart.com), Move.com (move.com), and Sears
`(sears.com), which are substantially similar implementations.
`
`The “Feedback” icon appears identically and behaves consistently on each of the plurality of particular
`web pages.
`
`For example, many of the web pages on the Fingerhut website include a “Feedback” icon (i.e., the “user-
`selectable element”), an example of which is identified below. This icon is viewable when the user
`navigates to and accesses the Fingerhut home page (or other particular web page).
`
`
`Page 10 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Fingerhut.com.
`
`A substantially similar icon appears identically and behaves consistently on most, if not all, Fingerhut web
`pages implementing the Qualtrics feedback solutions including Comment Cards, including the Fingerhut
`web page for “Kitchen.”
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Fingerhut.com – “Kitchen”
`
`
`
`
`See Fingerhut, “Kitchen,” available at http://www.fingerhut.com/section/Kitchen/10.uts.
`
`OpinionLab contends that this element is literally present. However, to the extent that the element is found
`to not be literally present, OpinionLab contends that, as demonstrated above, the Qualtrics Comment Card
`software utilized with multiple web pages on the Fingerhut website performs substantially the same
`function in substantially the same way to yield substantially the same result as this element and therefore
`infringes under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`Page 12 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`receive the page-specific
`user feedback
`concerning the particular
`web page for reporting
`to an interested party,
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`This element, as applied and shown above as to the Fingerhut website, similarly applies to additional
`Qualtrics Customer websites, including Kmart (kmart.com), Move.com (move.com), and Sears
`(sears.com), which are substantially similar implementations.
`
`The Qualtrics feedback solutions including Comment Cards software is operable to receive the page-
`specific user feedback concerning the particular web page.
`
`For example, upon the user accessing the particular web page and selecting the “Feedback” icon, the
`Qualtrics Comment Card shown below becomes viewable on the particular web page. Within the
`Comment Card, the user may provide page-specific feedback concerning the particular web page through
`subjective ratings and/or open-ended comments via either the “Page Ratings” or “Comments about this
`page” sections of the Comment Card. The user may then submit page-specific feedback to Qualtrics (as
`the feedback vendor for Fingerhut) by selecting the “Submit Feedback” button.
`
`
`Page 13 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`
`
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`
`The page-specific feedback concerning the particular web page may also be reported to an interested party.
`
`For example, Qualtrics describes a variety of reporting mechanisms to an interested party, such as a
`website owner like Fingerhut:
` “The View Reports section is designed to help you create quick, useful reports from your data.
`These reports are ideal for producing a standard report of your whole survey with basic filters and
`customization.” See Qualtrics, “About Viewing Reports,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/reporting/view-reports/about-viewing-reports/.
` “Graphs For Every Need: * Display data with over 30 different graph types. * Format each graph’s
`color, size, axis, & display settings. * Render graphs in Flash or export to Word, PowerPoint, or
`
`Page 14 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`the page-specific user
`feedback concerning the
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`PDF.” See Qualtrics, “Analysis and Reporting,” available at http://qualtrics.com/research-
`suite/survey-analysis-reporting/.
` “Filter Data: * Filter survey results by date range, subgroup, or completion status. * Track how a
`specific group responded to a survey. * Create subgroups using question responses or embedded
`data.” See Qualtrics, “Analysis and Reporting,” available at http://qualtrics.com/research-
`suite/survey-analysis-reporting/.
` “Drill Downs: * See a side-by-side comparison of demographic groups. * View answers to every
`question grouped by a specific element. * Drill down by survey questions, scoring categories, or
`embedded data.” See Qualtrics, “Analysis and Reporting,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/research-suite/survey-analysis-reporting/.
` “Custom Reports: * Track the data you care about. * Customize reports to your company’s needs. *
`Share password-protected survey results with anyone. Qualtrics can create custom reports
`especially for you. It is the best way to track what is happening while your surveys are deployed.
`These interactive reports are customized to your company’s needs, updated as new data streams in
`and can be accessed by anyone with a password – even if they don’t have a Qualtrics account.” See
`Qualtrics, “Enterprise Feedback Management,” available at http://qualtrics.com/research-
`suite/enterprise-feedback-management/.
`
`OpinionLab contends that this element is literally present. However, to the extent that the element is found
`to not be literally present, OpinionLab contends that, as demonstrated above, the elements are present
`under the doctrine of equivalents because the Qualtrics feedback solutions including comment cards found
`on Fingerhut web pages have at most insubstantial differences as compared to this element and/or perform
`substantially the same function in substantially the same way to yield substantially the same result as this
`element.
`
`This element, as applied and shown above as to the Fingerhut website, similarly applies to additional
`Qualtrics Customer websites, including Kmart (kmart.com), Move.com (move.com), and Sears
`(sears.com), which are substantially similar implementations.
`
`The page-specific user feedback concerning the particular web page may be provided by a user while the
`user remained at the particular web page.
`
`Page 15 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`particular webpages
`having been provided by
`a user while the user
`remained at the
`particular web page, and
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`For example, upon the user accessing the particular web page and selecting the “Feedback” icon, the
`Qualtrics Comment Card shown below becomes viewable on the particular web page. Within the
`Comment Card, the user may provide page-specific feedback concerning the particular web page through
`subjective ratings and/or open-ended comments via either the “Page Ratings” or “Comments about this
`page” sections of the Comment Card. The user may then submit page-specific feedback to Qualtrics (as
`the feedback vendor for Fingerhut) by selecting the “Submit Feedback” button. In addition, as shown
`below, the user may remain at and need not navigate away from Fingerhut.com in order to provide the
`page-specific feedback through the Qualtrics Comment Card.
`
`
`Page 16 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Fingerhut.com Home Page with Qualtrics Comment Card
`
`
`OpinionLab contends that this element is literally present. However, to the extent that the element is found
`to not be literally present, OpinionLab contends that, as demonstrated above, the elements are present
`under the doctrine of equivalents because the Qualtrics feedback solutions including comment cards found
`on Fingerhut web pages have at most insubstantial differences as compared to this element and/or perform
`substantially the same function in substantially the same way to yield substantially the same result as this
`element.
`
`
`
`Page 17 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`the page-specific user
`feedback comprising one
`or more page-specific
`subjective ratings of the
`particular web page and
`one or more associated
`page-specific open-
`ended comments
`concerning the particular
`web page,
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`This element, as applied and shown above as to the Fingerhut website, similarly applies to additional
`Qualtrics Customer websites, including Kmart (kmart.com), Move.com (move.com), and Sears
`(sears.com), which are substantially similar implementations.
`
`The page-specific user feedback comprises (1) one or more page-specific subjective ratings of the
`particular web page and (2) one or more associated page-specific open-ended comments concerning the
`particular web page.
`
`
`For example, upon the user accessing the particular web page and selecting the “Feedback” icon, the
`Qualtrics Comment Card shown below becomes viewable on the particular web page. The Comment Card
`allows the user to provide page-specific user feedback, through subjective ratings and open-ended
`comments, concerning the particular web page. For instance, the “Page Ratings” section of the Comment
`Card allows the user to provide feedback in the form of one or more ratings based upon the user’s
`perceived impressions of the particular web page as a whole. The “Overall” rating allows the user to
`provide a page-specific subjective rating of the particular web page as a whole, and each of the “Product
`Information,” “Look and Feel,” and “Ease of Use” ratings allows the user to rate at least one characteristic
`of the particular web page as a whole. Each of these numerical rating scales allows the user to rate the
`particular web page as a whole using a one to five (1-5) scale with at least one positive, neutral, and
`negative rating.
`
`
`Page 18 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`Further, the “Comments about this page” text box of the Comment Card shown below allows the user to
`provide open-ended comments concerning the particular web page without any limitation as to substance.
`
`
`
`
`Page 19 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`The associated text (e.g., “Page Ratings,” “Comments about this page,” and “Please take a moment to rate
`this page”) confirms that any entered subjective ratings or comments may concern the particular web page.
`
`
`
`
`Page 20 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com.
`
`It is also clear that the Qualtrics feedback solutions including Comment Cards operate on a page-specific
`basis, even where the Comment Card does not explicitly confirm that any entered feedback concerns the
`particular web page, because, for example, in order to request a Comment Card, the system constructs the
`Comment Card’s URL to include a “PageURL” component. As such, this component embedded within
`the URL is one method for later associating the particular web page with any feedback concerning that
`particular web page for analytics, reporting, or other purposes. For example, when fingerhut.com is the
`particular web page for feedback, the URL appears as:
`“PageURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fingerhut.com%2F”.4
`
`
`4 The full URL for the fingerhut.com Comment Card is: http://bluestembrands.az1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_41le6U2PrJjvJad&Pagetype=site+section&
`PageURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fingerhut.com%2F&Timeonsite=0%7C0&CustomerID=undefined&pagecount=4.
`
`Page 21 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`As can be seen from the source code of the Qualtrics Comment Card below, the particular web page,
`identified by the “Referer” label, is also embedded within the Qualtrics Comment Card itself.
`
`
`Qualtrics Comment Card from Fingerhut.com – Source Code
`
`
`Qualtrics’ Customer Support pages on its website confirm that the particular web page is embedded and
`included with the Comment Card to be utilized with feedback concerning the particular web page:
`
`
`
`
`. . .
`
`
`
`Excerpted from Qualtrics, “Embedded Data,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/advanced-building/survey-flow/embedded-data/
`
`
`
`
`Page 22 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`
`
`Excerpted from Qualtrics, “Embedded Data,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/site-
`intercept/intercepts/intercept-options/embedded-data/
`
`See also Qualtrics, “Feedback Link,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/site-
`intercept/creatives/passive-creatives/feedback-link/ (“Add Embedded Data to the Intercept to track which
`page the visitor was on when they clicked the Feedback Link. For more information refer to the Embedded
`Data page.”).
`
`In addition, this page-specificity of the feedback is apparent because it is provided in response to the user
`navigating to and accessing a particular web page and then subsequently selecting the “Feedback” icon to
`trigger the Comment Card concerning that particular web page. Moreover, independent of any user
`
`Page 23 of 203
`
`Qualtrics, LLC
`Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`OpinionLab, Inc.’s Initial Infringement Contentions (Case No. 1:13-cv-01574), Ex. A-6 – U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Claim 1 of
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`Accused Instrumentality
`Fingerhut.com Utilizing Qualtrics Feedback Solutions Including Comment Cards
`knowledge of the page-specific nature of the feedback, the Qualtrics feedback solutions including
`Comment Cards system ultimately collects, analyzes, and reports all feedback as it concerns the particular
`web page regardless of whether the user explicitly identifies the feedback as concerning the particular web
`page.
`
`Qualtrics confirms that its feedback solutions allow end-users to provide user feedback, for example:
` “Receiving website feedback is easy with the Feedback Link. This allows you to know what your
`website visitors are thinking and improve their experience.” Qualtrics, “Website Feedback,”
`available at http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/distributing/more-distribution-
`methods/website-feedback/.
` “The Feedback Link collects visitor’s opinions of your website. . . . Because a Feedback Link is
`passive, it may attract extreme viewpoints in the survey results – people who actively seek out a
`way to provide feedback because they either had an exceptionally positive or an exceptionally
`negative experience. . . . In general the Feedback Link is appropriate for collecting reactive website
`feedback.” Qualtrics, “Feedback Link,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/site-
`intercept/creatives/passive-creatives/feedback-link/.
` “The Matrix Table allows you to ask many multiple choice questions that use the same answer
`choice scale. . . . Likert: Allows you to place a scale of choices across the top.” Qualtrics, “Basic
`Building - Question Types Guide,” available at http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/basic-
`building/editing-questions/question-types-guide/.
` “Text Entry questions allow respondents to type in verbatim responses, such as comments and
`contact information.” Qualtrics, “Basic Building - Question Types Guide,” available at
`http://qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/basic-building/editing-questions/question-types-guide/.
` “Businesses adopt the platform to gather insights

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket