`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`QUALTRICS, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`OPINIONLAB, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00366
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER QUALTRICS, LLC’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`FILED VIA PRPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00366
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`
`
`Petitioner Qualtrics, LLC respectfully requests oral argument under 37
`
`CFR § 42.70. The PTAB has already scheduled an oral hearing for April 16,
`
`2015 and stated that the hearing will be for five trials: IPR2014-00366 (the
`
`instant IPR), and IRP2014-00356, IPR2014-00406, IPR2014-00420, and
`
`IPR2014-00421. (Paper 16.) The five trials involve five related patents. Because
`
`of the overlapping issues, Qualtrics requests that the PTAB provide a
`
`consolidated oral argument for all five trials in which Qualtrics is given two
`
`hours to present its arguments. Qualtrics also requests permission to use a
`
`computer, projector, and screen to display possible demonstratives and exhibits.
`
`For the instant IPR, Qualtrics specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`I. The grounds on which the instant IPR trial was instituted, i.e.:
`
`claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 14, 17–19, 22, 25–27, 30, and 33 of
`
`the ’805 Patent for obviousness over CustomerSat, Medinets,
`
`and the HTML Spec. This may include, for example, the level
`
`of ordinary skill in the art of the ’805 Patent and claim
`
`construction of the terms of the ’805 Patent.
`
`II. Patent Owner OpinionLab Inc.’s assertions regarding alleged
`
`secondary considerations of nonobviousness.
`
`III. Qualtrics’s Motion to Exclude Evidence.
`
`IV. Any Motion to Exclude Evidence filed by OpinionLab.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 27, 2015
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00366
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`
`
`/s/ Robert Steinberg
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00366
`U.S. Patent 8,041,805
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) and the parties’ agreement to electronic service
`
`on August 21, 2014, I certify that on February 27, 2015, a copy of:
`
`PETITIONER QUALTRICS, LLC’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`was served by e-mail on Patent Owner’s lead and backup counsel, as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com
`Paul Hastings LLP
`1117 S. California Ave.
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`
`
`
`Naveen Modi
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`Timothy P. Cremen
`timothycremen@paulhastings.com
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` By: /s/ Robert Steinberg
`
` Robert Steinberg
`
` Reg. No. 33144
`
` Neil A. Rubin
`
` Reg. No. 67030
`
` Jonathan M. Jackson (admitted pro hac vice)
`
` Philip X. Wang (admitted pro hac vice)
`
` Latham & Watkins LLP
`
` 355 South Grand Avenue
`
` Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`
` 213.485.1234
`
` 213.891.8763 (Fax)
`
` Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`