`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 37 (IPR2014-00356)
` Paper 31 (IPR2014-00366)
` Paper 31 (IPR2014-00406)
` Paper 28 (IPR2014-00420)
` Paper 29 (IPR2014-00421)
`Entered: December 5, 2014
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`QUALTRICS, LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`OPINIONLAB, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`Cases1
`IPR2014-00356 (Patent 6,606,581 B1)
`IPR2014-00366 (Patent 8,041,505 B2)
`IPR2014-00406 (Patent 7,085,820 B1)
`IPR2014-00420 (Patent 7,370,285 B1)
`IPR2014-00421 (Patent 8,024, 668 B2)
`Patent 5,602,524
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before RAMA G. ELLURU, JEREMY M. PLENZLER, GEORGIANNA
`W. BRADEN, and CARL M. DEFRANCO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ELLURU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceedings (37 C.F.R. § 42.5)
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the five listed cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one Order to be docketed in each case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00356 (Patent 6,606,581 B1)
`IPR2014-00366 (Patent 8,041,805 B2)
`IPR2014-00406 (Patent 7,085,820 B1)
`IPR2014-00420 (Patent 7,370,285 B1)
`IPR2014-00421 (Patent 8,024,668 B2)
`
`A teleconference call was held on Thursday, December 4, 2014,
`
`among Robert Steinberg, representing Petitioner; Naveen Modi,
`representing Patent Owner; and Judges Elluru, Plenzler, Braden, and
`DeFranco.
`
`The parties requested the call because Petitioner wants to videotape
`the deposition of Patent Owner’s witness, Dr. Shamos. Patent Owner
`objects. We have the authority to authorize video-recorded testimony
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(a). Petitioner’s proffered justification for
`videotaping the deposition testimony of Dr. Shamos is that video-recorded
`testimony will be better understood by the panel. While Patent Owner stated
`that, based on e-mail correspondence, its understanding was that the parties
`had agreed to not videotape depositions, Patent Owner could not point to any
`written agreement between the parties expressly stating that videotaped
`depositions were not permissible.
`
`Accordingly, we authorized video-recorded deposition testimony of
`Patent Owner’s witness, Dr. Shamos. We also relayed to the parties that
`pursuant to Rule 42.53(a), the parties may not submit video-recorded
`testimony without prior authorization.
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to videotape the deposition
`testimony of Patent Owner’s witness, Dr. Shamos.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00356 (Patent 6,606,581 B1)
`IPR2014-00366 (Patent 8,041,805 B2)
`IPR2014-00406 (Patent 7,085,820 B1)
`IPR2014-00420 (Patent 7,370,285 B1)
`IPR2014-00421 (Patent 8,024,668 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Robert Steinberg
`Neil A. Rubin
`Jonathan M. Jackson
`Philip Wang
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`bob.steinberg@lw.com
`neil.rubin@lw.com
`jonathan.jackson@lw.com
`philip.wang@lw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`Timothy P. Cremen
`Naveen Modi
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com
`timothycremen@paulhastings.com
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
