throbber
Gas Detection using a High Quantum Efficiency, 2-D JR InSb Staring Array
`
`David S. Smith and Jeffrey Moore
`Cincinnati Electronics Corporation
`7500 Innovation Way, Mason, Ohio 45040
`
`ABSTRACT
`For many terrestrial JR imaging applications, speed and sensitivity requirements can be met by
`several sensor technologies, including PtSi staring arrays, second generation scanned MCT
`arrays, InSb, and MCT staring arrays. However, for high quantum efficiency staring arrays,
`MCT and InSb in particular, much of the available signal remains unused because of well-fill
`restrictions. In narrow spectral band imaging applications the available photon flux is
`dramatically lower and high quantum efficiency becomes critical. One such application is
`detection and imaging of gases. High quantum efficiency arrays allow the use of narrow band
`filters centered on the absorption band of the gas, thus enhancing the ability of the imager to
`discriminate between background and gas emission. Results of imaging studies performed on a
`camera with a narrow band filter for gas detection are presented and analyzed.
`
`Keywords: infrared, infrared imaging, infrared detectors, gas detection, indium antimonide
`
`As infrared imaging detector development moves toward greater resolutions and wider fields of
`view, applications other than simple JR imaging are becoming possible as well as more
`intriguing. Uses of JR cameras to produce images of gases with emission (or absorption) lines
`within the passband of the camera have already found many applications. It is possible to
`produce images of exhaled air from the lungs without great effort. The question to be considered
`here is how does one produce the highest possible gas detection capability by narrowing the
`spectral region that the JR camera sees to only the passband of the gas to be detected. The
`obvious tradeoff here is that once the camera is optimized for use in only one narrow passband it
`cannot be used for other gases, unless they happen to be in the same passband. In order to bound
`the problem two approaches have been used here. Images of a gas in the narrow passband in
`which it emits have been obtained. Noise and uniformity measurements taken for the camera
`under controlled conditions indicate the maximum sensitivity for gas detection that can be
`obtained with the camera as studied here. It should be pointed out that this study is preliminary
`and in no way has optimization of the system for this purpose been performed.
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`W avelength (microns)
`Fig. 1 Atm ospheric transmission, -112 meter, 50% hum idity
`
`6
`
`7
`
`1 .0
`
`0.9
`
`0.8
`
`0.7
`
`0.6
`
`0.5
`
`C0 U
`
`)
`U)
`
`EU
`
`)C C
`
`U
`
`0-8194-191 1-7/95/$6.O0
`
`SPIE Vol. 2552 / 677
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00001
`
`

`

`Shown in figure 1 is a transmission curve over approximately a 1/2 meter range for normal
`laboratory air at about 50 percent humidity. (This curve was obtained in our lab using an FTER
`spectrometer set to 4 cm1 resolution.) Notice that over even short distances that the absorption
`band of carbon dioxide at 4.26 microns is rather deep and narrow. Since carbon dioxide is easily
`obtained in tanks and is relatively harmless (in properly ventilated rooms) it was decided to do
`these preliminary studies with CO2.
`
`A very narrow passband filter was obtained in the spectral region of the CO2 absorption band.
`Figure 2 is an overlay of the cooled filter passband used in the camera with the absorption band
`of carbon dioxide. The filter obtained was virtually ideal for the detection of CO2. Also notice
`in figure 2 that a significant portion of the light emitted by an object (in this case CO2 gas) will
`be absorbed by the atmosphere on its way to the camera. This point we will discuss in more
`detail later.
`
`4.0
`
`4.1
`
`4.2
`
`1 .0
`
`C0
`. 0.8
`')C
`F- 0.6
`(I)0
`E
`
`EC
`
`0.4
`
`G)
`
`U.
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`4.3
`Wavelength (microns)
`Fig. 2 Atmospheric Transmission convolved with Filter Transmission
`
`4.4
`
`4.5
`
`4.6
`
`In order to produce a wide range of images, and to provide a basis for "calibration " the CO2 gas
`was passed through a heater, thereby producing images of the gas flow at room temperature and
`above. Obviously, as the gas was heated it became easier to detect. Some estimates of the
`emissivity of gas will be used to provide a comparison between theory and experimental results.
`Shown in figure 3 is a composite image of "leaking" carbon dioxide at various temperatures.
`Two temperature sensors were placed inside the gas supply tube to provide an estimate of the gas
`temperature. One sensor was placed near the gas entry point (from the heater) and one near the
`exit point of the gas from the tube. The temperature sensor near the gas exit point consistently
`read a few degrees lower that the entry sensor so it is likely that the gas as shown in the
`following pictures was somewhat cooler than the exit temperature sensor indicated. The gas
`flow rate was on the order of 10 std-ft3/hr (relative to nitrogen). The flow could barely be felt on
`the palm of the hand.
`
`678 ISPIE Vol. 2552
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00002
`
`

`

`22 deg C = Tgas
`
`39deg.C=Tga
`
`Figure 3. Composite image of carbon
`dioxide gas escaping from the end of a tube
`at 10 std-ft3/hr. Three different gas
`temperatures, 22, 39, and 56 °C are shown
`here against a background blackbody
`temperature of 40 °C.
`
`Many more images of CO2 gas at temperatures intermediate to those shown in figure 3 were
`acquired. Figure 4 is a plot of signal levels from the areas of the images just outside the end of
`the tube (where the gas is hottest and most concentrated) and from just above the gas plume
`where the background is maintained at a constant 40 °C. The signal levels measured using the
`camera at some distance away from the blackbody will be lower than they would be when close
`to the blackbody as a result of absorption in the atmospheric CO2 between the camera and the
`heat source. In fact it appears that approximately one quarter of the radiation in the camera
`passband was absorbed before
`
`--
`--
`
`-
`
`1i_
`
`-
`
`Figure 4. Digital signal level
`from gas emission and 313 K
`background regions for the images
`shown in figure 3 and others. The
`3 1 3 K (40 °C) background level near
`23,000 units corresponds to a 76 %
`atmospheric transmission. The gas
`and blackbody were approximately 1
`meter from the camera. The thin
`horizontal line is the camera
`calibration for 40 °C at 0-distance.
`The thin line close to the gas data is
`a theoretical fit as explained in the
`text.
`
`40
`
`35
`
`:::c: 30
`ccc:ci
`05225
`, ..a
`
`20
`
`E -I
`E 1
`
`4"'$i
`
`:
`—-——i—
`ic9i!ZF
`
`-'
`
`'
`15
`295 300 305 310 315 320 325 330
`Temperature (K)
`
`SPIE Vol. 2552 I 679
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00003
`
`

`

`Figure 5a. Images of CO2 gas
`escaping the end of a 5 mm dia.
`tube at 10 ft3/hr. The appoximate
`gas temperatures are shown beside
`each sub-frame. As the
`temperature decreases the gas
`becomes less visible as long as the
`display scale is kept the same.
`Figure 5b shows how the image
`can be processed to increase
`contrast. The image in 5b is the
`entire frame corresponding to the
`subframe at the bottom of figure
`5a.
`
`52 °C
`
`48 °C
`
`40 °C
`
`33 °C
`
`27 °C
`
`22 °C
`
`Figure 5b. CO2 gas near room temperature
`escaping the end of a tube at a low rate. This
`image is histogram projected to display a range
`of roughly 3-4 bits, 1 part in 10. Even though
`the gas is near room temperature it is still
`easily detected using the InSb-based camera
`with a narrow-band filter. Background is
`uniform and at room temperature.
`
`reaching the camera. Reference to figure 2 shows that this level of absorption is consistent with
`the atmospheric transmission measured in the lab. (All of the images shown here were acquired
`with the camera approximately 1 m from the gas leak.) A "fit" to the gas emission data was
`obtained by adding 34 percent of the 40 deg. C background blackbody to 66 percent of the
`relative emitted energy from the gas. The sum was scaled to match just the blackbody emission
`at 40 C. This is expressed in the following equation where Ta is the transmission of the
`atmosphere between the blackbody/gas and the imager. Tg is the transmission of the gas itself
`and Eg is emissivity of the gas. K is an arbitrary scaling constant.
`
`Signal (DU' s) = K * Ta * [Tg * BB(313 K) + Eg
`
`*
`
`BB(Tgas) 1.
`
`680 / SPIE Vol. 2552
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00004
`
`

`

`These results suggest that the emissivity of the gas is high even for such a small diameter plume.
`(No attempt was made to calculate absolute emission and then predict camera signals using
`detailed camera characteristics such as quantum efficiency and electronic transfer functions.)
`"Random" variation in the background level and the signal levels from the gas at the different
`temperatures is most likely a result of changing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. (A person
`was in the room where the images were acquired.) This supposition is supported by the linearity
`and uniformity measurements of the camera using a calibrated wide-area blackbody to provide
`spatially uniform calibration fluxes at a range of temperatures.
`
`Low spatial nonuniformity as well as good linearity are crucial to obtaining images as good as
`those in figure 5. The measured stability and the unformity of the imager are well beyond what
`is required to produce the images in those figures. Figures 6 and 7 show the measured linearity
`
`Camera C alib ration w /C 02 filter
`
`4000
`
`3500
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`7
`4
`5
`6
`Calculated Relative Flux through filter (rd.)
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Figure 6. Digital signal versus calculated relative flux through
`the narrow band filter used to obtain the images presented here.
`Linearity is good to better than 0.1 percent absolute for this filter/
`integration time combination.
`
`and the noise equivalent temperature difference for the camera with the CO2 filter in place. It
`should be noted that the NETD measured for the narrow CO2 band is almost as good as that
`normally measured for this imager with a much wider bandpass filter. This was accomplished by
`integrating the signal for almost an entire frame time instead of using only a small fraction of the
`frame as is normally the case for the wide bandpass filter.
`
`SPIE Vol. 2552/681
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00005
`
`

`

`fI
`
`1I
`1.
`1/I
`•/
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`70 - ______________________________________
`
`—.--- Temperature (C) v Spatial NEDT
`_.u—-. Temperature (C) v Temp. NEDT
`
`!
`
`60 -
`
`50-
`
`40-
`
`,
`c
`3O-
`.;
`).
`0
`z
`
`20-
`
`.
`_\
`'
`\\\
`
`I5I /
`I / I
`
`N
`
`S
`
`I
`
`10 —
`0
`
`I
`10
`
`I
`
`I
`40
`20
`30
`Background Temperature (C)
`
`50
`
`60
`
`Figure 7. Spatial and temporal noise equivalent temperature
`differences as a function of background (calibration) temperature.
`Spatial uniformity is just as important as low temporal noise.
`
`In this regard, an important aspect of an JR camera' s application to gas detection that should be
`discussed is the quantum efficiency. If the detectors in the camera used to take the data in figure
`5b had only 5 percent quantum efficiency (rather than approximately 80 percent) we would not
`have been able to easily detect the presence of the gas down to room temperature simply because
`the signal-to-noise ratio would not have been high enough. Lower Q.E. cameras would not be
`able to produce these results simply because the signal in such a narrow spectral band is too
`small for cameras (e.g PtSi and uncooled imaging systems) that require essentially the full
`spectrum of radiation (and possibly full-frame integration) to produce high sensitivity images.
`
`The NETD measurement results in figure 7 are for a controlled set of conditions with the imager
`viewing a uniform blackbody. It says that if the blackbody changes temperature in one region of
`the image we will be able to detect a change of about 0.02 K. If the viewed object were a
`graybody instead of a blackbody we would expect to detect temperature changes of 0.02 / E
`
`682 ISPIE Vol. 2552
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00006
`
`

`

`where B is between 0 and 1, the emissivity of the graybody. (As B approaches 0 the object is
`becoming reflective instead of emissive.) Our results above suggest that the CO2 gas studied
`here is almost thick enough to act as a good graybody (almost a blackbody) so the minimum gas
`temperature difference measureable should be roughly the same as the NETD measurement
`provides. The slope of the gas signal curve in figure 4 is approximately 0.002 K per digital
`signal unit. The measured NETD (see figure 7) is approximately 0.02 K. Using a slope of 0.002
`K/DU this implies a noise value of 10 digital signal units out of 65535. In order to predict
`whether a given gas leak could be detected with such an imager one needs to take into account
`the size of the leak's image on the detector focal plane. The more pixels the image covers the
`better the spatial averaging, making it easier to detect its absorption/radiation effect, up to the
`limit where too much contrast within the image is lost.
`
`If we assume that the emissivity of the gas to be detected is determined by the concentration of
`the gas then the detectable temperature difference should be approximately
`
`Temperature difference
`
`NEDT I Absolute Gas Conc.
`
`By this reasoning CO2 concentrations on the order of 0. 1 % at a temperature difference of
`approximately 12 K should be detectable assuming we use emissivity alone. If we take into
`account the contrast generated by the absorption of the gas lower temperature differences should
`be detectable. Hot gases escaping from pipes or tubing are ideal candidates for this type of
`detection even if the leak itself is not in the field-of-view of the camera. In figure 8 images of
`CO2 gas mixed with N2 gas are shown escaping the end of the same tube used to produce the
`images in figures 3 and 5. From top to bottom the images show the effect of increasing carbon
`dioxide gas concentration on the intensity of the signal from the gas plume. For these pictures an
`attempt was made to maintain the total gas flow at a constant, slow, but arbitrary rate. For the
`low gas concentrations the signal increases with increasing gas concentration. As the
`concentration passes about 25-50 percent the rate of increase in signal appears to possibly level
`off indicating that an emissivity of 1 is being approached for the gas. A one percent
`concentration is easily detected using only a temperature difference of 8 K between the gas and
`the room temperature background. As pointed out above the noise level is on the order of 10
`digital units out of 65535 for full scale. The signal level for the 1 percent concentration image of
`figure 8a is 135 digital units (See figure 8b), approximately 10 times the noise level. This means
`that we could have detected gas concentrations as small as 0.08 percent at only a temperature
`difference of 8 K. This is slightly better than prediected above using the NEDT and the gas
`concentration. (With the gas flow gauges used in the setup for this experiment it was not
`possible to produce accurately measured mixtures of gases below 1 percent.)
`
`It should be noted again that the size of the gas stream coming from the tube is only about 5 mm
`diameter. If we were searching for longer pathlengths the "emissivity" of the overall beam
`would be increased resulting in a greater ability to detect lower concentrations. If several meters
`of gas pathlength are present it should be possible to detect concentrations of CO2 down to 10-
`100 ppm. As with any radiometric measurement process the detectability depends on the
`geometry of the situation so care must be taken not to claim gas detection capability at these
`levels for all configurations.
`
`SPIE Vol. 2552 / 683
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00007
`
`

`

`Figure 8a,b. Composite JR image of a mixture
`of carbon dioxide gas and nitrogen gas at 30
`degrees centigrade. The CO2 percentage is
`listed alongside the figure. An attempt was
`made to keep the total flow rate the same for
`the mixture throughout the sequence. It
`appears that some variation of the flow was
`ocurred vis-a-vis the point at which turbulent
`flow begins for the 50 percent and the 75
`percent mixtures. As can be seen the
`emissivity increases with increasing
`concentration. Intensity vs. concentration is
`plotted below showing the relationship
`between concentration and emissivity.
`
`I
`
`II
`
`I IIIlIJ
`
`I
`
`I IIIJ
`• •
`•_
`
`•
`
`1000
`
`I
`
`1111111
`10
`CO2 Gas Concentration
`
`1111111
`100
`
`•
`
`• I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`100
`
`>a
`
`.
`
`)-J
`C0)
`
`1%
`
`2%
`
`5%
`
`10%
`
`25%
`
`50%
`
`0
`7591
`
`100%
`
`While a full calibration of the camera for purposes of gas detection was not attempted here, we
`have been able to show that small temperature or gas concentrations are detectable using a high
`quantum efficiency, mid-wave imager based on InSb. Since the minimum detectable gas
`concentration or temperature change depends highly on the nature of the background
`environment, one should not draw too many conclusions from the images presented here.
`However, the fact that relative fluxes can be calculated and fit to gas emission data with sensible
`parameters is encouraging. It means that a camera calibration for narrow spectral regions can be
`meaningful, and used for quantitative measurement of gas phenomena.
`
`684 ISPIE Vol. 2552
`
`Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 11/15/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
`
`FLIR Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 1009-00008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket