`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: September 23, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2014-00482
`Patent 7,188,180 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and STEPHEN C.
`SIU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00482
`Patent 7,188,180 B2
`
`An initial conference call in the above proceeding was held on
`
`September 18, 2014, between respective counsel for Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner, and Judges Tierney, Easthom and Siu. The purpose of the call was
`
`to discuss any proposed changes to the Scheduling Order (Paper 11) and any
`
`motions that the parties intend to file.
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner filed papers, and confirmed during the
`
`call, that they did not seek authorization to file any additional motions at this
`
`time. Papers 12 and 13. Additionally, neither party sought to modify the
`
`schedule set forth in the Scheduling Order.
`
`The Board inquired as to the status of related district court litigation
`
`and any impact such litigation may have on this proceeding. No specific
`
`impact was identified during the call.
`
`There are several ongoing inter partes review proceedings involving
`
`Apple, Microsoft and Virnetx. The Board requested that the parties provide
`
`the Board with an overview of how the various proceedings are related. The
`
`parties agreed to work together and provide the Board with an overview in
`
`due course.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00482
`Patent 7,188,180 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`jkushan@sidley.com
`
`Joseph A. Micallef
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`
`Naveen Modi
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`Jason Stach
`Jason.stach@finnegan.com
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
