throbber
Paper 31
`Date: March 5, 2015
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases
`IPR2014-00501 (Patent 7,136,392 B2)
`IPR2014-00504 (Patent 7,382,771 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before MICHAEL KIM, PATRICK R. SCANLON, and
`KRISTINA M. KALAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KALAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`A call was held on March 4, 2015, among respective counsel for Petitioner
`and Patent Owner and Judges Kim, Scanlon, and Kalan. On February 27, 2015,
`Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly requested a conference call with the Board to
`
`
`1 This Order addresses overlapping issues in these cases. Therefore, we issue one
`order applicable to both cases. The parties are not authorized to use this style
`heading in subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00501 (Patent 7,136,392 B2)
`IPR2014-00504 (Patent 7,382,771 B2)
`
`discuss matters related to scheduling cross-examination of Dr. Sumit Roy,
`Petitioner’s expert declarant in IPR2014-00501 and IPR2014-00504. According to
`the parties, Dr. Roy is currently on an assignment teaching at the University of
`Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. The parties represent that Dr. Roy left for
`his assignment in New Zealand on February 18, 2015, and will return to the United
`States on April 6, 2015.
`Petitioner’s Replies in IPR2014-00501 and IPR2014-00504 were filed on
`February 9, 2015, along with a Second Declaration of Sumit Roy, Ph.D. IPR2014-
`00501, Paper 28, Ex. 1019; IPR2014-00504, Paper 26, Ex. 1012.
`The present Scheduling Orders (IPR2014-00501, Paper 14; IPR2014-00504,
`Paper 13) set out the following relevant due dates:
`DUE DATE 4 ......................................................................... March 23, 2015
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................. April 6, 2015
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 6 ........................................................................... April 13, 2015
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 7 .............................................................................. May 5, 2015
`Oral argument (if requested)
`During the call, the parties represented that they have discussed, but have
`not been able to agree upon, possible accommodations for Dr. Roy to be cross-
`examined prior to Due Date 4, i.e., March 23, 2015. Patent Owner represented that
`the parties had discussed a number of options, including (1) having Petitioner fly
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2014-00501 (Patent 7,136,392 B2)
`IPR2014-00504 (Patent 7,382,771 B2)
`
`
`Dr. Roy back to the United States for a live deposition during the normal window
`of time; (2) conducting the deposition in New Zealand, with Board permission; and
`(3) moving Due Dates 4–6 or Due Dates 4–7 to allow for a deposition of Mr. Roy
`upon his return to the United States. Petitioner indicated that Options 1 and 2 were
`impractical, but was amenable to Option 3. The parties proposed a number of
`potential amended dates for the relevant Due Dates in the Scheduling Orders.
`Petitioner represented that Mr. Roy could be made available as early as April 8,
`2015.
`
`As discussed during the phone call, Due Date 4 is moved to April 21, 2015,
`Due Date 5 is moved to April 24, 2015, and Due Date 6 is moved to April 28,
`2015. Due Date 7, the date of oral argument (if requested), remains unchanged and
`will take place on May 5, 2015. We note that the parties are free to file any paper,
`including the request for oral argument, in advance of their respective due dates.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Scheduling Orders in these proceedings (IPR2014-
`00501, Paper 14; IPR2014-00504, Paper 13) are hereby amended as follows:
`DUE DATE 4 ......................................................................... April 21, 2015
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................... April 24, 2015
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 6 ........................................................................... April 28, 2015
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00501 (Patent 7,136,392 B2)
`IPR2014-00504 (Patent 7,382,771 B2)
`
`
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Due Date 7 remains unchanged, and oral
`argument (if requested) will take place on May 5, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2014-00501 (Patent 7,136,392 B2)
`IPR2014-00504 (Patent 7,382,771 B2)
`
`For Petitioner:
`
`Theodore Brown
`tbrown@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Christopher Schenck
`cschenck@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`John Alemanni
`jalemanni@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`Brenton Babcock
`2BRB@knobbe.com
`
`Ted Cannon
`2tmc@knobbe.com
`
`Donald Coulman
`dcoulman@intven.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket