throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 31
`Entered: May 27, 2015
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
`CANON, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURE I LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2014-00535 (Patent 7,315,406 B2)
`IPR2014-00757 (Patent 8,300,285 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS. L. GIANNETTI, JAMES A. TARTAL, and
`PATRICK M. BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`The date for oral hearing in each of these proceedings is set for
`
`June 24, 2015, if hearing is requested by the parties and granted by the
`
`Board. Paper 25 (IPR2014-00535), Paper 9 (IPR2014-00757). Both parties
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00535 (Patent 7,315,406 B2)
`IPR2014-00757 (Patent 8,300,285 B2)
`
`have requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 26, 29
`
`(IPR2014-00535), Papers 24, 25 (IPR2014-00757). Petitioner’s and Patent
`
`Owner’s requests for oral hearing are granted.
`
`Each side will have 60 minutes, total, to present argument as to both
`
`cases. Any representation made by counsel at the consolidated oral hearing
`
`is applicable to and useable in all proceedings which have underlying basis
`
`for the representation. The Board will provide a court reporter for the
`
`consolidated hearing and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official
`
`record of the hearing for all three proceedings.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s
`
`claims at issue in these reviews are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will
`
`open the hearing by presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for
`
`which the Board instituted trial. Petitioner may allocate its time as it wishes
`
`among the two patents involved. After Petitioner’s presentation, Patent
`
`Owner will respond to Petitioner’s argument. Petitioner may reserve time to
`
`respond to arguments presented by Patent Owner.
`
`The hearing will commence at 2 PM on June 24, 2015, on the ninth
`
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. At
`
`least one member of the panel will be attending the oral argument remotely
`
`by use of two-way audio-visual communication equipment. The hearing
`
`will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. If the parties have any
`
`concern about disclosing confidential information, they are requested to
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00535 (Patent 7,315,406 B2)
`IPR2014-00757 (Patent 8,300,285 B2)
`
`contact the Board at least 10 days in advance of the hearing to discuss the
`
`matter.
`
`The parties are reminded that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a
`
`proponent of deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit.
`
`The Board will not consider any deposition testimony that has not been so
`
`filed.
`
`Furthermore, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must
`
`be served at least five business days before the hearing date. The parties
`
`also shall provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the
`
`Board at least five business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`
`this proceeding without prior authorization from the Board.
`
`The parties must file any objections to the demonstrative exhibits with
`
`the Board at least two business days before the hearing. Any objection to
`
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`
`demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection, and include a short (one
`
`sentence or less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or
`
`further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`
`schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties
`
`are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board
`
`of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00535 (Patent 7,315,406 B2)
`IPR2014-00757 (Patent 8,300,285 B2)
`
`January 27, 2015) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content
`
`of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending
`
`the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`
`with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to
`
`discuss the matter.
`
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`
`unless presented in a separate communication not less than five days before
`
`the hearing directed to the above email address.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00535 (Patent 7,315,406 B2)
`IPR2014-00757 (Patent 8,300,285 B2)
`
`PETITIONER
`
`Justin Oliver
`Daniel Glueck
`Canon406IPR@fchs.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`Brenton Babcock
`2brb@knobbe.com
`
`Tedd Cannon
`2tmc@knobbe.com
`
`Tim Seeley
`tim@intven.com
`
`James Hietala
`jhietala@intven.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket