throbber
581
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`: CIVIL ACTION
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`- VOLUME C -
`
`::
`
`::
`
`:
`: NO. 11-1077-RGA
`: CONSOLIDATED
`:
`: CIVIL ACTION
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
`CORPORATION, NOVARTIS
`AG, NOVARTIS PHARMA AG,
`NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL
`PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, and
`LTS LOHMANN
`THERAPIE-SYSTEME AG,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL,
`INC.,
`Defendant.
`------------------------
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
`CORPORATION, NOVARTIS
`AG, NOVARTIS PHARMA AG,
`NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL
`PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, and
`LTS LOHMANN
`THERAPIE-SYSTEME AG,
`Plaintiffs
`
`::
`
`:
`:
`:
`: NO. 11-1112-RGA
`
`vs.
`WATSON LABORATORIES,
`INC., WATSON PHARMA,
`INC., and WATSON
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Defendants.
`Wilmington, Delaware
`Wednesday, August 28, 2013
`8:33 o'clock, a.m.
`- - -
`BEFORE: HONORABLE RICHARD G. ANDREWS, U.S.D.C.J.
`
`::
`
`Hawkins Reporting Service
`715 N. King Street - Wilmington, Delaware
`
`19801
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2053
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`
`749
`
`Q. Good afternoon, Dr. Tiemessen.
`A. Good afternoon.
`Q. Please tell us a little about yourself.
`A. I'm Henricus, also go by Harry, Tiemessen,
`and I am born, raised, and educated in Holland,
`and currently I work for Novartis Pharma in Basel
`in Switzerland, and I work there as a senior
`fellow in the department developing injectables
`and topical formulations.
`Q. Would you please review your education and
`training for us?
`A. I did my bachelor and master degree in
`Nijmejn, N-i-j-m-e-j-n, and afterwards I did my
`Ph.D. in University of Leiden, L-e-i-d-e-n.
`I did Ph.D. focusing on the
`development of topical formulations for drug
`delivery, and I was also dealing with the study
`of permeation of skins, through skin, in order to
`mimic the situation in man.
`Q. And since graduating with your Ph.D., has
`there been a particular focus to your
`professional life?
`A. I have been working as a pharmaceutical
`scientist formulator expert since then.
`
`Hawkins Reporting Service
`715 N. King Street - Wilmington, Delaware
`
`19801
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2053
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`
`750
`
`Q. What did you do following your doctoral
`studies?
`A. After my Ph.D., I went to work for Sandoz
`in Basel, Switzerland.
`Q. When was that?
`A. That was in 1989.
`Q. What is Sandoz?
`A. Sandoz is the predecessor to Ciba-Geigy --
`Novartis. They merged with Ciba-Geigy early in
`'97 in order to form Novartis.
`Q. Why did you join Sandoz?
`A. When I had finished my Ph.D., there were
`not that many opportunities in Holland, then I
`started to look around in Europe, then I found
`the work that I could do at Sandoz the most
`interesting, particularly in the field of
`transdermal drug delivery.
`Q. What was your title when you first joined
`Sandoz?
`A. When I started Sandoz, I was head of
`formulation group.
`Q. What were your responsibilities?
`A. There, I was formulation expert for the
`rivastigmine transdermal drug delivery project,
`
`Hawkins Reporting Service
`715 N. King Street - Wilmington, Delaware
`
`19801
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2053
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`
`756
`
`Garinot. He was the analytical expert situated
`in France. And we had Karen Ann Bergmann. She
`was project team leader. And that role was
`taken over by Mr. Ogorka in early '96.
`And Mr. Richter was also -- Fritz, he
`was my department head.
`Q. Okay. That was from the Novartis side; is
`that right?
`A. That's correct. Yeah.
`Q. What about the LTS side?
`A. The LTS side we had Mr. Asmussen, the
`department head, the department of development.
`We had Michael Horstmann. He was the RD head.
`And in '95, I was working together
`with Kai Kopke. He was the project leader at the
`Lohmann site.
`Q. Thank you. Can you tell us a little bit
`about the makeup of the team in terms of their
`educational background and experience?
`A. They were all Ph.D.s in their areas. And,
`in addition, they had quite some development
`experience.
`Q. Now I would like you to take us back to
`1989 through 1988 -- 1998 and walk us through the
`
`Hawkins Reporting Service
`715 N. King Street - Wilmington, Delaware
`
`19801
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2053
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`
`770
`
`MR. FIGG: Well, that was the point
`I was wanting to make clear on the record that
`I'm not sure why this is being offered. But if
`that is the reason it's being offered, I would
`object to it.
`
`THE COURT: Okay. Do you have
`anything to say in response, Mr. Prugo?
`MR. PRUGO: It's the context behind
`the invention. Okay.
`THE COURT: All right. Keep going.
`
`BY MR. PRUGO:
`Q. So you see the word stability that's
`referred to in this document. Is that a
`reference to oxidative degradation?
`A. No. This is referencing to stability in
`general. The chemical stability in general and
`also the physical stability in general.
`Q. And can you characterize the team's
`expectations regarding encountering the stability
`issue?
`A. In fact, we didn't expect stability issues
`to come because, at that point in time, we had a
`lot of experience with oral forms which were in
`the development. And at that point in time, we
`
`Hawkins Reporting Service
`715 N. King Street - Wilmington, Delaware
`
`19801
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2053
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`
`771
`
`also had quite experience with the chemical
`stability of the first generation, the first
`lead formulation.
`MR. FIGG: Your Honor, I don't want
`to continue to interrupt, but may I have a
`continuing objection to this kind of testimony on
`the grounds that it is irrelevant to the issue of
`obviousness, what the expectations of these
`particular individuals --
`THE COURT: And I'll give you the
`continuing objection. And if you have some other
`objection that comes up, feel free to stand up.
`MR. FIGG: Thank you.
`THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead, Mr.
`
`Prugo.
`
`MR. PRUGO: Your Honor, plaintiffs
`move to introduce JTX 191, which is the technical
`development plan into evidence.
`MR. FIGG: Which one?
`MR. PRUGO: 191. JTX 191.
`MR. FIGG: Well, subject to my
`objections that the inventors' path to the
`invention is not relevant and the subject matter
`about the hurdles they envisioned and what they
`
`Hawkins Reporting Service
`715 N. King Street - Wilmington, Delaware
`
`19801
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2053
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 6 of 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket