throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 


`
`Paper 24
`Date Entered: April 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,
`and
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., and
`LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BLACK HILLS MEDIA, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00711
`Case IPR2015-00338
`Patent 8,320,099 B2
`____________
`
`Before BRIAN J. McNAMARA, PETER P. CHEN, and
`FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00711
`IPR2015-00338
`Patent 8,320,099 B2


`
`
`BACKGROUND
`On April 30, 2014, Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications
`America, LLC (collectively, “Petitioner Samsung”) filed a Petition (Paper 1)
`seeking inter partes review of claims 1 and 10–12 of U.S. Patent No.
`8,320,099 B2 (“the ’099 patent”). On November 4, 2014, we instituted inter
`partes review of claims 10–12 of U.S. Patent No. 8,230,099 B2 in IPR2014-
`00711. Paper 7, 20–21. On December 3, 2014, Petitioner LG Electronics,
`Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A.,
`Inc. (collectively, “Petitioner LG”) filed a Petition for inter partes review of
`claims 1 and 10–12 of the ’099 patent (Paper 2), and a Motion for Joinder to
`IPR2014-00711 (Paper 3).
`On January 28, 2015, we instituted inter partes review of claims 10–
`12 of the ’099 patent in IPR2015-00338 and granted Petitioner LG’s motion
`for joinder of IPR2015-00338 with previously instituted IPR2014-00711.
`IPR2014-00711, Paper 16, 3–4. In that Decision, the grounds on which
`IPR2014-00711 was instituted were unchanged, no other grounds were
`instituted in the joined proceeding, and the Scheduling Order in place for
`IPR2014-00711 (Paper 12) was unchanged and applied to the joined
`proceeding. IPR2014-00711, Paper 16 at 4. We also terminated the
`IPR2015-00338 proceeding. Id. at 4.
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, on February 4, 2015, Patent Owner
`filed its Response. Paper 17. Patent Owner did not file a motion to amend.
`On April 3, 2015, Patent Owner filed a Request for Adverse Judgment,
`

`
`2 
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00711
`IPR2015-00338
`Patent 8,320,099 B2


`Paper 23, requesting adverse judgment pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b),
`with respect to the claims that are the subject of this joined proceeding:
`Patent Owner . . . hereby requests that the Board cancel claims 10–12
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,230,099 (“the ‘099 Patent”). These claims are all
`claims for which the present inter partes review has been instituted.
`See Decision – Institution of Inter Partes Review, Paper 7, pp. 20–21.
`See also Decision – Institution of Inter Partes Review and Grant of
`Motion for Joinder, Paper 16.
`
`In view of the cancellation of all claims remaining in the trial, Patent
`Owner requests that the Board enter adverse judgment against Patent
`Owner in this proceeding pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.73(b)(2).
`
`Paper 23, 1. Petitioner Samsung and Petitioner LG have not filed any reply
`to the Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`
`DISCUSSION
`A party may request entry of adverse judgment against itself at any
`time during a proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b). Patent Owner has
`conceded that the requested judgment effectively will cancel the claims
`identified for trial and moot this proceeding. Paper 23, 1. There is no
`pending motion to amend claims. See Paper 16. Patent Owner also has
`indicated by email to the Board that Petitioners have no objection to the
`Request for Adverse Judgment. Under these circumstances, the request for
`entry of adverse judgment is appropriate.
`ORDER
`It is ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request for adverse judgment
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) with respect to claims 10–12 of U.S. Patent No.
`8,230,099 B2 is GRANTED; and,
`

`
`3 
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00711
`IPR2015-00338
`Patent 8,320,099 B2


`ORDERED that judgment is entered herein against Patent Owner with
`respect to claims 10–12 of U.S. Patent No. 8,230,099 B2. Claims 10–12 of
`U.S. Patent No. 8,230,099 B2 are not patentable, and shall be cancelled.
`
`
`PETITIONERS:
`Andrea Reister
`areister@cov.com
`
`Gregory Discher
`gdischer@cov.com
`
`Doris Johnson Hines
`dori.hines@finnegan.com
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`jonathan.stroud@finnegan.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Reza Mollaaghababa
`mollaaghababar@pepperlaw.com
`
`Thomas Engellenner
`engellennert@pepperlaw.com
`
`Christopher Horgan
`chris.horgan@concerttechnology.com
`
`

`
`4 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket