`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Parrot S.A. and Parrot, Inc.
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`Drone Technologies, Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2014-00730
`U.S. Patent No. 7,584,071
`___________________
`
`
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, and
`CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00730
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper
`
`9), Petitioners Parrot S.A. and Parrot, Inc. (collectively “Petitioner”) respectfully
`
`request oral argument, currently scheduled for July 1, 2015, on the issues raised in
`
`the Petition, in the Board’s Institution Decision, Patent Owner’s Response,
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response, Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude
`
`(if filed), and Petitioner’s Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude (if
`
`filed).
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests one (1) hour of time for oral argument on all
`
`issues raised in the parties’ filings, including without limitation the following:
`
`1. Whether claims 1-15 of the ’071 patent are unpatentable in view of
`
`the cited prior art on the grounds instituted in the Board’s Decision of Institution,
`
`Paper 7, including the following:
`
`2. Whether claims 1-5 and 10-14 are anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`by Smith (Ex. 1002, U.S. Patent No. 5,043,646);
`
`3. Whether claims 6 and 7 are rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`by the combination of prior art references Smith (Ex. 1002, U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,043,646) and Barr (Ex. 1005, U.S. Patent No. 7,219,861);
`
`4. Whether claims 8 and 9 are rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`by the combination of prior art references Smith (Ex. 1002) and Fouche (Ex. 1006,
`
`U.S. 6,751,529); and,
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00730
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`5. Whether claim 15 is rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 by the
`
`combination of prior art references Smith (Ex. 1002), Spirov (Ex. 1007, U.S. App.
`
`Pub. 2006/0144994), Bathiche (Ex. 1008, U.S. Patent No. 7,145,551), and
`
`Shkolnikov (Ex. 1009, U.S. App. Pub. No. 2004/0263479).
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Issues raised in any other party filing.
`
`Issues raised in oral argument.
`
`Any issue the Board deems necessary.
`
`Petitioner requests authorization to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector,
`
`and screen during oral argument.
`
`Dated: May 27, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/James E. Hopenfeld/
`James E. Hopenfeld (Reg No. 47,661)
`Hopenfeld@oshaliang.com
`Tammy J. Terry (Reg No. 69,167)
`Terry@oshaliang.com
`OSHA LIANG LLP
`909 Fannin Street, Suite 3500
`Houston, Texas 77010
`Tel: 713-228-8600/Fax: 713-228-8778
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00730
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies service pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) on the
`
`Patent Owner by email and U.S. Mail a copy of the Petitioner’s Request for Oral
`
`Argument as follows:
`
`Gene Tabachnick
`James Dilmore
`gtabachnick@beckthomas.com
`jdilmore@beckthomas.com
`docket@beckthomas.com
`BECK & THOMAS, P.C.
`1575 McFarland Road, Suite 100
`Pittsburgh, PA 15216-1808
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: May 27, 2015
`
`/James E. Hopenfeld/
`James E. Hopenfeld (Reg No. 47,661)
`Hopenfeld@oshaliang.com
`Tammy J. Terry (Reg No. 69,167)
`Terry@oshaliang.com
`OSHA LIANG LLP
`909 Fannin Street, Suite 3500
`Houston, Texas 77010
`Tel: 713-228-8600/Fax: 713-228-8778
`Counsel for Petitioner
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
