`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ____________
`
`
`PARROT S.A. and PARROT, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`DRONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00732
`Patent 8,106,748
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`CASE IPR2014-00732
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2014-00732
`
`Drone Technologies, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) hereby requests the
`
`opportunity to have an oral argument at the Board pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.70.
`
`
`
`ISSUES TO BE ARGUED
`
`Spirov fails as a primary reference
`
`I.
`
`A. Spirov operates as a single, multi-component system, and not in
`
`multiple modes.
`
`B. As such, there is no reason or motivation to retrofit Spirov’s
`
`disclosure with a switch to select individual components of the
`
`system
`
`II.
`
`The claims of the ’748 patent are non-obvious over Spirov in view of
`
`the cited secondary references.
`
`A. The secondary references do not cure the deficiencies of Spirov.
`
`B. Neither Bathiche nor Shkolnikov is analogous art.
`
`III. The Board’s reliance on the D’Andrea declaration is misplaced.
`
`A. D’Andrea’s unsigned declaration is inadmissible.
`
`B. Even if D’Andrea signed a declaration, a different declaration was
`
`submitted to the Board.
`
`C. Alternatively, D’Andrea’s declaration should be given little or no
`
`weight.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2014-00732
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In light of these remarks, Patent Owner respectfully requests the
`
`opportunity to have an oral argument at the Board in the above-referenced
`
`matter. If the Board has any questions, comments, or suggestions, the
`
`undersigned attorney earnestly requests a telephone conference.
`
`While the Patent Owner believes that no fee is due, the Patent Owner
`
`authorizes the Board to charge any deficiencies in fees and credit any
`
`overpayment of fees to deposit account no. # 502395/2664.
`
`
`
`The Patent Owner consents to electronic service of process and receipt
`
`of any other correspondence when sent to all of these email addresses:
`
`gtabachnick@beckthomas.com;
`
`jdilmore@beckthomas.com; and
`
`docket@beckthomas.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/James G. Dilmore/
`
`Gene Tabachnick; Reg. No. 33,801
`James Dilmore; Reg. No. 51,618
`BECK & THOMAS, P.C.
`Pittsburgh, PA 15216-1808
`(412) 343-9700
`
`
`Date of Deposit: May 27, 2015
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2014-00732
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on May 27,
`
`2015, a copy of the foregoing document was served by email upon the
`
`following:
`
`James E. Hopenfeld (hopenfeld@oshaliang.com)
`Tammy J. Terry (terry@oshaliang.com)
`
`
`
`and via FedEx:
`
`James E. Hopenfeld
`Tammy J. Terry
`Osha Liang LLP
`909 Fannin Street, Suite 3500
`Houston, Texas 77010
`
`/James G. Dilmore/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`