throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ____________
`
`
`PARROT S.A. and PARROT, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`DRONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00732
`Patent 8,106,748
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`CASE IPR2014-00732
`
`
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2014-00732
`
`Drone Technologies, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) hereby requests the
`
`opportunity to have an oral argument at the Board pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.70.
`
`
`
`ISSUES TO BE ARGUED
`
`Spirov fails as a primary reference
`
`I.
`
`A. Spirov operates as a single, multi-component system, and not in
`
`multiple modes.
`
`B. As such, there is no reason or motivation to retrofit Spirov’s
`
`disclosure with a switch to select individual components of the
`
`system
`
`II.
`
`The claims of the ’748 patent are non-obvious over Spirov in view of
`
`the cited secondary references.
`
`A. The secondary references do not cure the deficiencies of Spirov.
`
`B. Neither Bathiche nor Shkolnikov is analogous art.
`
`III. The Board’s reliance on the D’Andrea declaration is misplaced.
`
`A. D’Andrea’s unsigned declaration is inadmissible.
`
`B. Even if D’Andrea signed a declaration, a different declaration was
`
`submitted to the Board.
`
`C. Alternatively, D’Andrea’s declaration should be given little or no
`
`weight.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2014-00732
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In light of these remarks, Patent Owner respectfully requests the
`
`opportunity to have an oral argument at the Board in the above-referenced
`
`matter. If the Board has any questions, comments, or suggestions, the
`
`undersigned attorney earnestly requests a telephone conference.
`
`While the Patent Owner believes that no fee is due, the Patent Owner
`
`authorizes the Board to charge any deficiencies in fees and credit any
`
`overpayment of fees to deposit account no. # 502395/2664.
`
`
`
`The Patent Owner consents to electronic service of process and receipt
`
`of any other correspondence when sent to all of these email addresses:
`
`gtabachnick@beckthomas.com;
`
`jdilmore@beckthomas.com; and
`
`docket@beckthomas.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/James G. Dilmore/
`
`Gene Tabachnick; Reg. No. 33,801
`James Dilmore; Reg. No. 51,618
`BECK & THOMAS, P.C.
`Pittsburgh, PA 15216-1808
`(412) 343-9700
`
`
`Date of Deposit: May 27, 2015
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2014-00732
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on May 27,
`
`2015, a copy of the foregoing document was served by email upon the
`
`following:
`
`James E. Hopenfeld (hopenfeld@oshaliang.com)
`Tammy J. Terry (terry@oshaliang.com)
`
`
`
`and via FedEx:
`
`James E. Hopenfeld
`Tammy J. Terry
`Osha Liang LLP
`909 Fannin Street, Suite 3500
`Houston, Texas 77010
`
`/James G. Dilmore/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket