`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 96
`Entered: August 23, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LOS ANGELES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT
`HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00752
`Patent 8,133,903 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before FRANCISCO C. PRATS, SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, and
`SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`SNEDDEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Elizabeth B. Hagan
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00752
`Patent 8,133,903 B2
`
`
`Patent Owner filed a Motion for pro hac vice admission of Elizabeth
`
`B. Hagan (Paper 66 (“Motion”)) and a supporting declaration from Ms.
`
`Hagan (Exhibit 2114 (“Declaration”)) in the above-identified proceeding.
`
`Petitioner has not opposed the Motion. Patent Owner did not file an
`
`opposition to the Motion. 37 C.F.R. § 42.25. For the following reasons, the
`
`Motion is granted.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration
`
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Unified Patents,
`
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013)
`
`(Paper 7) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission”)).
`
`Having reviewed the Motion and supporting Declaration, good cause
`
`exists for granting admission pro hac vice to Ms. Hagan.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDERED that the Motion is granted, and Ms. Hagan is authorized
`
`to represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in the above-listed
`
`proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Hagan shall comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the August 2018 Update,
`
`83 Federal Register 39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018) and the July 2019 Update,
`
`84 Federal Register 33,925 (July 16, 2019), and the Board’s Rules of
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00752
`Patent 8,133,903 B2
`
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`
`Regulations;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Hagan is subject to the USPTO’s
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and to
`
`the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a); and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding; Ms.
`
`Hagan is authorized to represent Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00752
`Patent 8,133,903 B2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Mark Feldstein
`Charles Lipsey
`Mark Stewart
`Dan Wood
`Joshua Goldberg
`Maureen Queler
`mark.feldstein@finnegan.com
`charles.lipsey@finnegan.com
`stewart_mark@lilly.com
`wood_dan_l@lilly.com
`joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`maureen.queler@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David Tellekson
`Ewa Davison
`Virginia DeMarchi
`Michael Shuster
`Jonathan T. McMichael
`dtellekson@fenwick.com
`edavison@fenwick.com
`vdemarchi@fenwick.com
`mshuster@fenwick.com
`jmcmichael@fenwick.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
