`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 13
`Entered: December 11, 2014
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORP.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-007851
`Patent 6,636,591 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`Securus Technologies, Inc. (“Securus”) filed motions for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Jeffrey R. Bragalone in each of the proceedings identified
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses the same issues in the inter partes reviews listed in
`the Appendix. Therefore, we issue one Decision to be filed in all of the
`cases. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style of filing in
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00785
`Patent 6,636,591 B2
`
`in the Appendix. Paper 8 (“Mot.”).2 In separate communications, Global
`Tel*Link Corp. (“Global Tel*Link”) indicated that it did not oppose the
`motions. For the reasons provided below, Securus’ motions are granted.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel pro hac
`vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. The Order
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission requires a statement of facts
`showing there is good cause for us to recognize counsel pro hac vice, and an
`affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to appear in the proceedings
`identified in the Appendix.
`In the proceedings at issue, lead counsel for Securus, Justin B.
`Kimble, is a registered practitioner. Mot. 1. Patent Owner’s Motions
`indicate that there is good cause for us to recognize Mr. Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`pro hac vice during these proceedings, and each is supported by a
`Declaration (Ex. 2001). Mot. 2.
`Mr. Bragalone is indicated to be an experienced patent litigation
`attorney and has been practicing law, with a focus on patent litigation and
`other intellectual property matters. Mot. 2–3. Mr. Bragalone declares that
`he has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`proceedings identified in the Appendix, as he has been representing Securus
`in the related district court litigation that involves the same patents being
`
`
`2 For the purpose of clarity and expediency, we treat IPR2014-00785 as
`representative, and all citations are to IPR2014-00785 unless otherwise
`noted.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00785
`Patent 6,636,591 B2
`
`challenged in the proceedings before us. Ex. 2001 ¶ 9. Additionally, Mr.
`Bragalone’s Declaration complies with the requirements set forth in the
`Board’s Order authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission. Id. ¶¶ 1–9.
`Based on the record, we find that Mr. Bragalone has sufficient legal
`and technical qualifications to represent Securus in the proceedings
`identified in the Appendix. We further recognize that there is a need for
`Securus to have its counsel in the co-pending litigation involved in the
`proceedings before us. Accordingly, Securus has established that there is
`good cause for Mr. Bragalone’s admission.
`For the foregoing reasons, it is
`ORDERED that Securus’ motions for pro hac vice admission of Mr.
`Bragalone for the instant proceeding are granted; Mr. Bragalone is
`authorized to represent Securus as back-up counsel in the instant
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Securus is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in the instant proceedings; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bragalone is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the C.F.R., and to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00785
`Patent 6,636,591 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`Numbers
`6,636,591 B1
`
`Petitioner
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Global
`Tel*Link
`Global
`Tel*Link
`Global
`Tel*Link
`Global
`Tel*Link
`Securus
`
`Securus
`
`Securus
`
`Securus
`
`Securus
`
`Securus
`
`Securus
`
`Global
`Tel*Link
`Global
`Tel*Link
`Global
`Tel*Link
`
`Inter Partes
`Reviews
`IPR2014-00785
`
`Paper No.
`for Motion
`8
`
`7,324,637 B2
`
`7,860,222 B1
`
`7,805,457 B1
`
`IPR2014-00810
`IPR2014-01278
`IPR2014-01282
`IPR2014-01283
`
`7,783,021 B2
`
`IPR2015-00153
`
`7,853,243 B2
`
`IPR2015-00155
`
`7,551,732 B2
`
`
`IPR2015-00156
`
`
`6
`
`8
`6
`6
`
`8
`
`7
`
`8
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00785
`Patent 6,636,591 B2
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER / PATENT OWNER:
`Michael D. Specht
`Michael B. Ray
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`mspecht-PTAB@skgf.com
`mray-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER / PETITIONER:
`Justin B. Kimble
`BRAGALONE CONROY P.C.
`jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
