throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper No. 30
`Date Entered: August 5, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ERICSSON INC. and
`TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00919
`Patent 7,848,353 B2
`____________
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, WILLIAM A. CAPP, and
`DAVID C. MCKONE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00919
`Patent 7,848,353 B2
`
`
`As set forth in the Scheduling Order (Paper 9), oral argument, if
`
`requested, is scheduled for August 25, 2015 in connection with this
`proceeding. Both parties have requested oral argument. Papers 25, 28. The
`requests are granted. IPR2014-00915 is related to this proceeding, and
`involves the same parties. Oral argument also has been requested in
`IPR2014-00915. Oral argument for the two proceedings hereby is
`consolidated into a single session.
`
`Oral argument will commence at 10:00 AM ET on August 25, 2015.
`The hearing will be conducted on the ninth floor of Madison Building East,
`600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. The hearing will be open to
`the public for in-person attendance, which will be accommodated on a first-
`come, first-served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the
`hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the
`hearing.
`
`Each party will have sixty (60) minutes of total argument time for the
`consolidated hearing in connection with the IPR2014-00915 and IPR2014-
`00919 proceedings. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the
`claims at issue in this review are unpatentable. Therefore, at oral hearing
`Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with regard to the challenged
`claims on which basis we instituted trial. Petitioner may reserve rebuttal
`time. Thereafter, Patent Owner will argue its opposition to Petitioner’s case.
`Petitioner may use any time Petitioner reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s
`opposition.
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00915
`Patent 8,396,079 B2
`
`
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing. The
`parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced
`during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s
`transcript.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five business days prior to the hearing. The parties are further directed to
`file demonstrative exhibits two business days prior to the hearing, and
`request a conference call with the Board no later than two business days
`prior to the hearing to resolve any dispute over the propriety of each party’s
`demonstrative exhibits. The parties are responsible for requesting such a
`conference sufficiently in advance of the hearing to accommodate this
`requirement. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented
`timely will be considered waived. The parties may refer to CBS Interactive
`Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033 (PTAB October 23,
`2013) (Paper 118), and St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Div., Inc. v. The Board
`of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27,
`2014) (Paper 65) regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative
`exhibits.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. Lead or backup counsel, however, may present the
`party’s argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`attending the oral argument, the parties should request a joint telephone
`conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00915
`Patent 8,396,079 B2
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that oral argument will commence at 10:00 AM ET on
`
`August 25, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00915
`Patent 8,396,079 B2
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Andrew Lowes
`David M. O’Dell
`John Russell Emerson
`Clint Wilkins
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`andrew.lowes.ipr@haynesboone.com
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`russell.emerson.ipr@haynesboone.com
`clint.wilkins.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Herbert D. Hart III
`Andrew B. Karp
`Steven J. Hampton
`Philip H. Sheridan
`McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
`hhart@mcandrews-ip.com
`akarp@mcandrews-ip.com
`shampton@mcandrews-ip.com
`psheridan@mcandrews-ip.com
`
`James R. Hietala
`Tim R. Seeley
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
`dcoulman@intven.com
`tim@intven.com
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket