`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD.,
`SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO
`INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.,
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA),
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN CHINA),
`COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, NATURE’S MARK, RITE AID CORP., SMART
`SOLAR, INC., AND TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00937
`Patent 8,362,700
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`
`Mail Stop "PATENT BOARD"
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`1
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,362,700
`Case IPR2014-00937
`
`On June 11, 2014, Jiawei Technology (HK) Ltd., Jiawei Technology (USA)
`
`Ltd., Shenzhen Jiawei Photovoltaic Lighting Co., Ltd., Atico International (Asia)
`
`Ltd., Atico International USA, Inc., Chien Luen Industries Co., Ltd., Inc. (Chien
`
`Luen Florida), and Chien Luen Industries Co., Ltd., Inc. (Chien Luen China),
`
`Coleman Cable, LLC, Nature’s Mark, Rite Aid Corp., Smart Solar, Inc., and Test
`
`Rite Products Corp. (collectively “Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review seeking review of claims 1-11, 13-15, 24-34, and 45-47 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,362,700. Purported Patent Owner, SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
`
`("Patentee"), submitted its Preliminary Response on September 19, 2014 (Paper
`
`No. 21). On December 16, 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued its
`
`Judgment denying Petitioner's petition. Paper No. 22 at p. 10 ("ORDERED that no
`
`inter partes review of the '700 patent is instituted and that all grounds sed forth in
`
`the Petition are denied.")
`
`The Rules provide for a refund of the institution fee if the Board does not
`
`institute trial. Payment of the $19,200 post-institution fee was processed through
`
`PRPS on June 11, 2014, and charged to Deposit Account 19-3140. Petitioner
`
`hereby requests a refund of $19,200 for the post-institution fee under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.15(a)(2).
`
`Upon review and approval of this request, Petitioner respectfully requests
`
`that the Board credit the post-institution fee to Deposit Account 19-3140.
`
`1
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,362,700
`Case IPR2014-00937
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: ___2/13/15_______
`
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`DENTONS U.S. LLP
`
`____/Kevin Greenleaf/__________
`Mark C. Nelson
`Reg. No. 43,830
`Lissi Mojica
`Reg. No. 63,421
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Reg. No. 64,062
`Daniel Valenzuela
`Reg. No. 69,027
`
`2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,362,700
`Case IPR2014-00937
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on February 13, 2015, a copy of Petitioner’s
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST INSTITUTION FEE was served on the
`
`Counsel for the Patent Owner via email to the following email addresses:
`
`tfshiells@shiellslaw.com
`
`admin@shiellslaw.com
`
`marchusb@tlpmb.com
`
`Dated: _February 13, 2015
`
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`___/Nona Durham/_________
`Nona Durham
`
`3
`
`