throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD.,
`SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO
`INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.,
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA),
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN CHINA),
`COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, NATURE’S MARK, RITE AID CORP., SMART
`SOLAR, INC., AND TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00938
`Patent 7,429,827
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument in the IPR2014-00938 (’938 IPR)
`
`under 37 C.F.R. §42.70(a). Pursuant to the Scheduling Order dated December 22,
`
`2014 (Paper 21), oral argument is currently scheduled for September 21, 2015
`
`(Paper 21, Due Date 7).
`
`Oral argument will focus on the patentability of the challenged claims of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,429,827 ("the '827 Patent"). And Petitioner specifies the following
`
`principal issues to be argued, without intent to waive consideration of any
`
`allowable issue not requested or raised by the Patent Owner:
`
`1. Claims 24-26 as obvious in view of Chliwnyj (U.S. Patent No. 5,924,784,
`
`Exhibit 1005), Wu (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/0201874, Exhibit 1006),
`
`Pu (CN 2522722Y, Exhibits 1007-1009) and Dowling (U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,064,498, Exhibit 1010).
`
`2. Claims 27-29 and 35 as obvious in view of Chliwnyj and Wu.
`
`3. Claim 30 as obvious in view of Chliwnyj, Wu and Lau (U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,431,719, Exhibit 1011).
`
`2
`
`

`
`Petitioner notes that related proceedings (IPR2014-00935 (’935 IPR) and
`
`IPR2014-00936 (’936 IPR)) also have oral argument scheduled for the same day.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner agreed to consolidate the hearings for the ’938 and
`
`’936 IPRs due to similarities, but agreed that the ’935 oral argument should remain
`
`separate. Therefore, the parties request a 4-hour oral argument—two hours for each
`
`party.
`
`Petitioner additionally requests permission to present handouts of demonstrative
`
`exhibits during the oral argument.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DENTONS US LLP
`
`Dated: __August 19, 2015_________
`
`___/Kevin Greenleaf/_______
`
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`Mark C. Nelson
`Reg. No. 43,830
`Lissi Mojica
`Reg. No. 63,421
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Reg. No. 64,062
`Daniel Valenzuela
`Reg. No. 69,027
`
`3
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the PETITIONER’S REQUEST
`
`FOR ORAL ARGUMENT for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827
`
`was served on the Counsel for the Patent owner via email to the following email
`
`addresses:
`
`tfshiells@shiellslaw.com
`
`admin@shiellslaw.com
`
`marcusb@tlpmb.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: __August 19, 2015_____
`
`___/Nona Durham/_________
`
`Nona Durham
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket