`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD.,
`SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO
`INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.,
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA),
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN CHINA),
`COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, NATURE’S MARK, RITE AID CORP., SMART
`SOLAR, INC., AND TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00938
`Patent 7,429,827
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument in the IPR2014-00938 (’938 IPR)
`
`under 37 C.F.R. §42.70(a). Pursuant to the Scheduling Order dated December 22,
`
`2014 (Paper 21), oral argument is currently scheduled for September 21, 2015
`
`(Paper 21, Due Date 7).
`
`Oral argument will focus on the patentability of the challenged claims of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,429,827 ("the '827 Patent"). And Petitioner specifies the following
`
`principal issues to be argued, without intent to waive consideration of any
`
`allowable issue not requested or raised by the Patent Owner:
`
`1. Claims 24-26 as obvious in view of Chliwnyj (U.S. Patent No. 5,924,784,
`
`Exhibit 1005), Wu (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/0201874, Exhibit 1006),
`
`Pu (CN 2522722Y, Exhibits 1007-1009) and Dowling (U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,064,498, Exhibit 1010).
`
`2. Claims 27-29 and 35 as obvious in view of Chliwnyj and Wu.
`
`3. Claim 30 as obvious in view of Chliwnyj, Wu and Lau (U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,431,719, Exhibit 1011).
`
`2
`
`
`
`Petitioner notes that related proceedings (IPR2014-00935 (’935 IPR) and
`
`IPR2014-00936 (’936 IPR)) also have oral argument scheduled for the same day.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner agreed to consolidate the hearings for the ’938 and
`
`’936 IPRs due to similarities, but agreed that the ’935 oral argument should remain
`
`separate. Therefore, the parties request a 4-hour oral argument—two hours for each
`
`party.
`
`Petitioner additionally requests permission to present handouts of demonstrative
`
`exhibits during the oral argument.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DENTONS US LLP
`
`Dated: __August 19, 2015_________
`
`___/Kevin Greenleaf/_______
`
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`Mark C. Nelson
`Reg. No. 43,830
`Lissi Mojica
`Reg. No. 63,421
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Reg. No. 64,062
`Daniel Valenzuela
`Reg. No. 69,027
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the PETITIONER’S REQUEST
`
`FOR ORAL ARGUMENT for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827
`
`was served on the Counsel for the Patent owner via email to the following email
`
`addresses:
`
`tfshiells@shiellslaw.com
`
`admin@shiellslaw.com
`
`marcusb@tlpmb.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: __August 19, 2015_____
`
`___/Nona Durham/_________
`
`Nona Durham
`
`4