IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In the Inter Fortes Review of US. Patent No. 8,156,096
`
`Trial No: Not Yet Assigned
`
`Issued: April 10, 2012
`
`Filed: September 23, 2011
`
`Inventor: Meiresonne
`
`Title: SUPPLIER IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATOR SYSTEM AND
`METHOD
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID W. WU
`
`1, David W. Wu, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:
`
`l.
`
`I am an Associate at the law firm of Jones Day and a back—up counsel
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`2.
`
`I provide this declaration in connection with the above~identified Inter
`
`Partes Review proceeding that is being requested at the US. Patent and Trademark
`
`Office by Google Inc. under 35 U.S.C. § 311. Unless otherwise stated, the facts in
`
`this declaration are based on my personal knowledge.
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1001 is a true and correct copy of US. Patent No. 8,156,096,
`
`which is being asserted against Petitioner Google in a parallel district court suit,
`
`Industrial Quick Search, et al. v. Google, Inc. et al., No. 1:13-CV—00770-JTN
`
`Google Exhibit 1020
`Page 1
`
`
`
`In the Inter Fortes Review of US. Patent No. 8,156,096
`
`Trial No: Not Yet Assigned
`
`Issued: April 10, 2012
`
`Filed: September 23, 2011
`
`Inventor: Meiresonne
`
`Title: SUPPLIER IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATOR SYSTEM AND
`METHOD
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID W. WU
`
`1, David W. Wu, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:
`
`l.
`
`I am an Associate at the law firm of Jones Day and a back—up counsel
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`2.
`
`I provide this declaration in connection with the above~identified Inter
`
`Partes Review proceeding that is being requested at the US. Patent and Trademark
`
`Office by Google Inc. under 35 U.S.C. § 311. Unless otherwise stated, the facts in
`
`this declaration are based on my personal knowledge.
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1001 is a true and correct copy of US. Patent No. 8,156,096,
`
`which is being asserted against Petitioner Google in a parallel district court suit,
`
`Industrial Quick Search, et al. v. Google, Inc. et al., No. 1:13-CV—00770-JTN
`
`Google Exhibit 1020
`Page 1
`
`
`
`(W1). Mich.) (the “District Court Case”). According to the Proof of Service filed
`
`with the District Court, the complaint in that case was served on Google on July
`
`19, 2013. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of this
`
`document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1002 is a true and correct copy of the file history for US.
`
`Application No. 09/938,163, filed August 23, 2001, produced to Petitioner by the
`
`Patent Owner in the District Court Case. Page numbers and an exhibit label have
`
`been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit 1003 is a true and correct copy of the file history for US.
`
`Application No. 10/421,268, filed April 23, 2003, produced to Petitioner by the
`
`Patent Owner in the District Court Case. Page numbers and an exhibit label have
`
`been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`6.
`
`Exhibit 1004 is a true and correct copy of the file history for US.
`
`Application No. 12/341,857, filed December 22, 2008, produced to Petitioner by
`
`the Patent Owner in the District Court Case. Page numbers and an exhibit label
`
`have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`to
`
`Google Exhibit 1020
`Page 2
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 1005 is a true and correct copy of the file history for US.
`
`Application No. 13/241,554, filed September 23, 2011, produced to Petitioner by
`
`the Patent Owner in the District Court Case. Page numbers and an exhibit label
`
`have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 1006 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from a book in my
`
`possession by Brad Hill entitled “World Wide Web Searching For Dummies” (IDG
`
`Books Worldwide, Inc, 2nd Ed. 1997). The book bears a copyright date of 1997
`
`and is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity. Page numbers
`
`and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other
`
`alterations have been made.
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1007 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,271,840
`
`(Finseth). Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of this
`
`document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`10.
`
`Exhibit 1008 is a true and correct copy of US. Patent Pub. No.
`
`2002/0042750 (Morrison). Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to
`
`the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`11.
`
`Exhibit 1009 is a true and correct copy of US Patent Pub. No.
`
`2003/0146939 (Petropoulos). Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added
`
`to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`Google Exhibit 1020
`Page 3
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Exhibit 1010 is a true and correct copy of The Parties’ Joint
`
`Comprehensive Claim Construction Statement, jointly filed by the Patent Owner
`
`and the Petitioner on April 21, 2014 in the District Court Case. Page numbers and
`
`an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of this document but no other
`
`alterations have been made.
`
`13.
`
`Exhibit 1014 is a true and correct copy of an article by Bederson, et al.
`
`entitled “Pad++: A Zoomable Graphical Sketchpad For Exploring Alternate
`
`Interface Physics.” The article was published in the March 1996 issue of the
`
`Journal of Visual Languages & Computing and is in a condition that creates no
`
`suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`14.
`
`Exhibit 1015 is a true and correct copy of an article by Bederson, et a1.
`
`entitled “A Zooming Web Browser.” The article was published in March, 1996 by
`
`the International Society for Optics and Photonics and is in a condition that creates
`
`no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`15.
`
`Exhibit 1016 is a true and correct copy of an article by T. Berners-
`
`Lee, et a1. entitled “The World-Wide Web.” The article was published in
`
`Communications of the ACM, Volume 37, No. 8, pp. 76—82 in August 1994 and is
`
`in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`16.
`
`Exhibit 1017 is a true and correct copy of an article by E. Kasten
`
`entitled “HTML, A Gentle Introduction.” The article was published in the Linux
`
`Google Exhibit 1020
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Journal, 15‘h Edition. Article 3 p. 35 in July 1995 and is in a condition that creates
`
`no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`17.
`
`Exhibit 1018 is a true and correct copy of a book in my possession by
`
`R. Wagner entitled “JavaScript Unleashed” ('2‘1d Ed, samsnet). The book bears a
`
`copyright date of 1997 and is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its
`
`authenticity.
`
`18.
`
`Exhibit 1019 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the tile
`
`history for US. Patent No. 6,271,840 to Finseth et al., that I requested from the
`
`US. Patent and Trademark Office, including Exhibits 1-4 filed with U.S.
`
`Application No. 09/ 160,633 for “Graphical Search Engine Visual Index” on
`
`September 24, 1998. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the
`
`bottom of this document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`Executed this 18th day of July, 2014.
`
`At
`
`“Pale AHO,6A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David W. Wu
`
`UI
`
`Google Exhibit 1020
`Page 5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
