`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 4
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EMPIRE IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-01500
`Patent 7,389,198
`____________
`
`Mailed: October 2, 2014
`
`Before Amy Kattula, Trial Paralegal
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION
`AND
`TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`
`
`The petition for inter partes review patent review in the above
`
`proceeding has been accorded the filing date of September 15, 2014.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01500
`Patent 7,389,198
`
`
`A review of the petition identified the following defect(s):
`
`Claim Terms: How a challenged claim is to be construed cannot be
`
`just a statement that the claim terms are to be given their “broadest
`
`reasonable interpretation” or “ordinary and customary meaning.” At least
`
`one claim term must be specifically construed. This requirement may be
`
`met by citing a district court’s claim construction and stating that the court’s
`
`construction(s) should be adopted. Please file a corrected petition within
`
`5 business days. There is no need to re-file the exhibits.
`
`Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later
`
`than three months from the date of this notice. The preliminary response is
`
`limited to setting forth the reasons why the requested review should not be
`
`instituted. Patent Owner may also file an election to waive the preliminary
`
`response to expedite the proceeding. For more information, please consult
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012),
`
`which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`
`Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory
`
`notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of
`
`the petition.
`
`The parties are encouraged to use the heading on the first page of this
`
`Notice for all future filings in the proceeding.
`
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties are
`
`authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order --
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639,
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01500
`Patent 7,389,198
`
`Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under
`
`“Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.”
`
`The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the
`
`Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web
`
`site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`
`If there are any questions pertaining to this notice, please contact
`
`Amy Kattula at 571-272-5826 or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at
`
`571-272-7822.
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Eric Buresh
`Eric.vuresh@eriseip.com
`
`Jason Mudd
`Jason.mudd@eriseip.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Daniel Mitry
`212 East 47th Street
`#24J
`New York, NY 10017
`
`
`
`3
`
`