`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________
`
`
`MICROBOARDS TECHNOLOGY, LLC d/b/a AFINIA,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`STRATASYS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Patent No. 8,349,239
`Filing Date: SEPTEMBER 23, 2009
`Issue Date: JANUARY 8, 2013
`Title: SEAM CONCEALMENT FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELS
`
`_________________
`
`INTER PARTES REVIEW NO. IPR2015-00288
`_________________
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF TIMOTHY E. GRIMSRUD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00288
`U.S. Patent No. 8,349,239
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Timothy E. Grimsrud
`
`
`
`Statement of Precise Relief Requested
`
`I.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and Paper No. 5 authorizing the patent
`
`owner to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c),
`
`Patent Owner Stratasys Inc., requests that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`(the “Board”) admit Timothy E. Grimsrud pro hac vice in this proceeding,
`
`IPR2015-00288.
`
`This motion is being filed no sooner than twenty one (21) days after
`
`service of the petition.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to Recognize
`Counsel Pro Hac Vice During the Proceeding
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize
`
`counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause,
`
`subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any
`
`other conditions the Board may impose. Section 42.10(c) indicates that “where
`
`the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by
`
`counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity
`
`with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” The facts here establish
`
`good cause for the Board to recognize Timothy E. Grimsrud pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00288
`U.S. Patent No. 8,349,239
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Timothy E. Grimsrud
`
`
`1.
`
`Lead counsel, Walter C. Linder, is a registered practitioner.
`
`2.
`
`Counsel, Timothy E. Grimsrud, is an experienced litigator and has
`
`an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`Accompanying this motion as Exhibit 2001 is the Declaration of Timothy E.
`
`Grimsrud in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (“Grimsrud
`
`Decl.”). In his declaration, Mr. Grimsrud asserts:
`
`
`
`“I am a member in good standing of the Bar of Minnesota
`as well as the following Federal Courts:
`(a) U. S. District Court for the District of Minnesota (10/12/2005);
`(b) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (04/07/2005); and
`(c) U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Wisconsin
`(04/21/2008).” (Grimsrud Decl., ¶ 2).
`
`Mr. Grimsrud also asserts:
`
`“I have been in private practice for about 9 years, during which time I have
`been continuously litigating patent cases. The other Inter Partes Review
`proceeding before the Office for which I have applied to appear pro hac vice
`(and authorized to appear) is No. IPR2014-00606. Concurrently with this
`declaration, I am submitting declarations in connection with motions to
`appear pro hac vice in Inter Partes Review Nos.: IPR2015-00287 and IPR
`2015-00284, that also relate to patents at issue in the litigation referred to in
`paragraph 10 below. I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this
`proceeding. I am trial counsel for the Patent Owner in the matter Stratasys
`Inc. v. Microboards Technology, LLC, No.0:13-cv-03228-DWF-JJG (filed
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00288
`U.S. Patent No. 8,349,239
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Timothy E. Grimsrud
`
`
`on November 25, 2013), which is related to and involves the same patent at
`issue in this proceeding.” (Grimsrud Decl., ¶¶ 9-10).
`
`3.
`
`In his declaration, Mr. Grimsrud also attests to each of the listed items
`
`required by the “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in
`
`Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7. (See Grimsrud Decl., ¶¶ 1-11).
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the
`
`Board admit Timothy E. Grimsrud pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Walter Linder/
`Walter C. Linder
`Reg. No. 31,707
`FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP
`2200 Wells Fargo Center
`90 South 7th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901
`Tel.: (612) 766- 7000
`Fax.: (612) 766-1600
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Dated: March 19, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00288
`U.S. Patent No. 8,349,239
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Timothy E. Grimsrud
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Timothy E. Grimsrud, and associated
`Exhibit 2001, to be served via electronic mail on the following:
`
`
`
`William J. Cass
`Cantor Colburn LLP
`20 Church Street, 22nd Floor
`Hartford, Connecticut 06103
`wcass@cantorcolburn.com
`
`Herbert M. Bedingfield
`Cantor Colburn LLP
`20 Church Street, 22nd Floor
`Hartford, Connecticut 06103
`hbedingfield@cantorcolburn.com
`
`Brad D. Pedersen
`Patterson Thuente Pedersen, P.A.
`80 South 8th Street, Suite 4800
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`prps@ptslaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 19, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
`2200 Wells Fargo Center
`90 South Seventh Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901
`Telephone: (612) 766-7000
`Facsimile: (612) 766-1600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Walter Linder /
`Walter C. Linder
`Reg. No. 31,707
`Customer No. 25764
`Telephone: (612) 766-8801
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
