throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571–272–7822
`
`
`Paper 16
`Entered: February 13, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD.,
`SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO
`INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.,
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA),
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN CHINA),
`COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, NATURE’S MARK, RITE AID CORP., SMART
`SOLAR, INC., AND TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2015-00580
`Patent 7,429,827 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON, JUSTIN T. ARBES and
`BARRY L. GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SAINDON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00580
`Patent 7,429,827
`
`
`I. DISCUSSION
`
`On January 16, 2015, Petitioner requested joinder of IPR2015-00580 and
`IPR2014-00938. IPR2015-00580 seeks to address four claims on which review
`was denied in IPR2014-00938. Petitioner is seeking to expedite Patent Owner’s
`preliminary response period in IPR2015-00580. We have the authority to expedite
`a preliminary response under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(1) (“Times set by rule . . . may be
`modified by order.”).
`We held a conference call on February 11, 2015, during which time we
`heard the views of both sides on the matter. For the following reasons, we grant
`Petitioner’s request to expedite Patent Owner’s preliminary response.
`The issue in IPR2015-00580 is largely the same as the issue in IPR2014-
`00938. Patent Owner addressed Petitioner’s asserted ground that claims 31-34 of
`the ’827 patent would have been obvious in view of Chliwnyj and Wu in the
`Preliminary Response filed in IPR2014-00938. Petitioner now asserts that claims
`31-34 would have been obvious in view of Chliwnyj, Wu, and Lau. The new
`reference, Lau, was at issue in IPR2014-00938 with respect to another claim.
`Accordingly, the new ground involves only four claims and is substantially similar
`to the old ground, with the addition of a new reference with which Patent Owner is
`familiar already. Thus, we determine it would not overly burden Patent Owner to
`file its preliminary response expeditiously.
`In addition, if we were not to expedite Patent Owner’s preliminary response
`and then later grant joinder, it would require significant scheduling changes in
`IPR2014-00938. For example, Patent Owner would likely have to engage in a
`second round of discovery because Due Date 1 in IPR2014-00938 (March 23,
`2015) would have passed.
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00580
`Patent 7,429,827
`
`
`We are to construe our rules “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive
`resolution of every proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.1(b). Weighing the above
`considerations, we determine the most efficient and least burdensome path in this
`case and in IPR2014-00938 is to set Patent Owner’s preliminary response in
`IPR2015-00580 to be due no later than March 16, 2015.
`We are mindful that this may affect the parties’ preparation in IPR2014-
`00938 and we encourage the parties to confer and to stipulate to new due dates in
`that proceeding if the need arises.
`We also hereby authorize Petitioner to submit, at its option, a reply to Patent
`Owner’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder, should Patent Owner file
`an opposition to that Motion. The reply is limited to no more than 5 pages and is
`due by March 16, 2015.
`
`II. ORDER
`
`In view of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response must be uploaded
`into PRPS no later than March 16, 2015; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to submit a reply to
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder of no more than 5
`pages by March 16, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00580
`Patent 7,429,827
`
`PETITIONER:
`Mark Nelson
`Daniel Valenzuela
`Lissi Mojica
`Kevin Greenleaf
`mark.nelson@dentons.com
`daniel.valenzuela@dentons.com
`lissi.mojica@dentons.com
`kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Theodore Shiells
`Marcus Benavides
`tfshiells@shiellslaw.com
`marcusb@tlpmb.com
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket