`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD.,
`SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO
`INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.,
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA),
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN CHINA),
`COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, NATURE’S MARK, RITE AID CORP., SMART
`SOLAR, INC., AND TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP.
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2015-00580
`Patent 7,429,827
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`
`Mail Stop "PATENT BOARD"
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`1
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827
`Case IPR2015-00580
`
`On January 16, 2015, Jiawei Technology (HK) Ltd., Jiawei Technology
`
`(USA) Ltd., Shenzhen Jiawei Photovoltaic Lighting Co., Ltd., Atico International
`
`(Asia) Ltd., Atico International USA, Inc., Chien Luen Industries Co., Ltd., Inc.
`
`(Chien Luen Florida), and Chien Luen Industries Co., Ltd., Inc. (Chien Luen
`
`China), Coleman Cable, LLC, Nature’s Mark, Rite Aid Corp., Smart Solar, Inc.,
`
`and Test Rite Products Corp. (collectively “Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review seeking review of claims 31-34 of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827 and a
`
`Motion for Joinder to Related Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827
`
`(IPR2014-00938). Purported Patent Owner, SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
`
`("Patentee"), submitted its Opposition to Motion for Joinder on February 17, 2015
`
`(Paper No. 20). On March 16, 2015 Petitioner filed a Reply to Opposition to
`
`Motion for Joinder. On May 1, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued its
`
`Judgment denying Petitioner's petition and Motion for Joinder. Paper No. 22 at p. 7
`
`("ORDERED that an inter partes review is not
`
`instituted; and FURTHER
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Joinder is denied.")
`
`The Rules provide for a refund of the institution fee if the Board does not
`
`institute trial. Payment of the $14,000 post-institution fee was processed through
`
`PRPS on January 16, 2015, and charged to a Credit Card ending in 1225. Petitioner
`
`hereby requests a refund of $14,000 for the post-institution fee under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.15(a)(2).
`
`1
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827
`Case IPR2015-00580
`
`Upon review and approval of this request, Petitioner respectfully requests
`
`that the Board credit the post-institution fee to Credit Card ending in 1225.
`
`Dated: ___6/1/15_______
`
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DENTONS U.S. LLP
`
`____/Kevin Greenleaf/_________
`Mark C. Nelson
`Reg. No. 43,830
`Lissi Mojica
`Reg. No. 63,421
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Reg. No. 64,062
`Daniel Valenzuela
`Reg. No. 69,027
`
`2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,827
`Case IPR2015-00580
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on June 1, 2015, a copy of Petitioner’s
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF THE POST INSTITUTION FEE was served on the
`
`Counsel for the Patent Owner via email to the following email addresses:
`
`tfshiells@shiellslaw.com
`
`admin@shiellslaw.com
`
`marcusb@tlpmb.com
`
`Dated: June 1, 2015
`
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`___/Nona Durham/_________
`Nona Durham
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
