`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 11
`Entered: Oct. 1, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NIKE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAYFONK ATHLETIC, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00655 & Case IPR2015-00656
`(Patent 8,860,584 B1)1
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KARL D. EASTHOM,
`and JASON J. CHUNG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`EASTHOM, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of the Proceeding
`35 U.S.C. § 317
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.73, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Judgment is entered in each identified case.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00655 & IPR2015-00656
`Patent 8,860,584 B1
`
`The parties filed a joint motion in each case to terminate each
`proceeding (“Motion”) and a true copy of their written settlement agreement
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b) and 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). Paper 10;
`Ex. 1014. The Motion states that “the parties have settled their dispute as
`to” U.S. Patent No. 8,860,584. Paper 10, 2. The Board does not have before
`it full briefing on the trial issues, and has not entered a final decision.
`Accordingly, it is appropriate to enter judgment terminating this proceeding,
`without rendering a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.2; 42.72;
`42.73(a).2
`It is
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2015-00655 and
`IPR2015-00656 is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated.
`PETITIONER:
`Edward H. Sikorski
`James M. Heintz
`DLA Piper LLC (US)
`Nike-Mayfonk-IPR@dlapiper.com
`Nike-Mayfonk-IPR@dlapiper.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Edward J. Benz
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`joebenz@paulhastings.com
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`2 A judgment “means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination
`of a proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`
`
`2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
