`IPR2015-00698
`U.S. Patent No. 8,092,345
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`ADIDAS AG,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00698
`U.S. Patent No. 8,092,345
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2015-00698
`U.S. Patent No. 8,092,345
`Pursuant to the Board’s August 14, 2015 Scheduling Order (Paper 10),
`
`
`
`Petitioner Under Armour, Inc. respectfully requests oral argument, currently
`
`scheduled on May 13, 2016. Petitioner requests to schedule oral argument for this
`
`inter partes review in connection with the oral argument for IPR2015-00697 and
`
`IPR2015-00700, in which Petitioner is filing similar requests for oral argument.
`
`The three inter partes reviews have been on the same schedule throughout the
`
`proceedings, and are presently scheduled for oral argument on the same date.
`
`
`
`Petitioner also requests combining oral argument for the three inter partes
`
`reviews into a single argument, thereby eliminating the need to address
`
`overlapping issues among the three proceedings. Petitioner requests that the
`
`combined arguments be scheduled for a total of 3 hours, with 90 minutes allocated
`
`to each party.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Petitioner specifies the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`
`
`A. Whether claims 1-3, 6-11, 15-17, and 20 are obvious over Mault in
`
`view of DeLorme;
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`Evidentiary issues raised in Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude.
`
`Petitioner further requests the uses of audio-visual equipment to assist its
`
`arguments and to display its demonstrative exhibits, including a computer-
`
`connectable projector and a screen.
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2015-00698
`U.S. Patent No. 8,092,345
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /
`
` Brian E. Ferguson /
`Brian E. Ferguson (Reg. No. 36,801)
`Anish R. Desai (Reg. No. 73,760)
`Christopher T. Marando (Reg. No.67,898)
`W. Sutton Ansley (Reg. No. 67,828)
`Robert T. Vlasis (Pro Hac Vice)
`Zachary C. Garthe (Pro Hac Vice)
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: 202-682-7000
`brian.ferguson@weil.com
`anish.desai@weil.com
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`robert.vlasis@weil.com
`zachary.garthe@weil.com
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Dated: April 8, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on April 8, 2016, the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served via
`
`electronic mail, upon the following:
`
`Mitchell G. Stockwell
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
`mstockwell@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Wab P. Kadaba
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Jonathan D. Olinger
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
`jolinger@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`/ Timothy J. Andersen / c
`Timothy J. Andersen
`Case Manager
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: 202-682-7075
`timothy.andersen@weil.com
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
