throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 59
`Entered: April 25, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`UNDER ARMOUR, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ADIDAS AG,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00697 (Patent 7,905,815 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00698 (Patent 8,092,345 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00700 (Patent 8,579,767 B2)
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, MICHEAL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`JUSTIN BUSCH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUSCH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Argument
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00697 (Patent 7,905,815 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00698 (Patent 8,092,345 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00700 (Patent 8,579,767 B2)
`
`Petitioner, Under Armour, Inc., and Patent Owner, adidas AG, each
`requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 in all three cases. E.g.,
`IPR2015-00697 Papers 31, 34. Upon consideration, the requests for oral
`hearing are granted. Oral argument shall commence at 10:00 AM Eastern
`Time on May 13, 2016, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600
`Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. The hearing will be open to the public
`for in-person attendance, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600
`Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-person attendance will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. One or more judges of
`the panel may attend remotely. Petitioner also requested that the hearing for
`these matters be consolidated. E.g., IPR2015-00697 Paper 31, 1. We grant
`that request as well.
`Each party will have ninety (90) minutes of total time, a portion of
`which it may initially reserve, to present arguments in the following order:
`First, Petitioner may argue its grounds of unpatentability upon
`which trial was instituted and its Motions to Exclude;
`Second, Patent Owner may argue in opposition thereto and
`argue is own Motions to Exclude;
`Third, Petitioner may present rebuttal arguments with respect to
`its grounds of unpatentability and its own Motions to Exclude and
`arguments in opposition to Patent Owner’s Motions to Exclude; and
`Fourth, Patent Owner may present rebuttal arguments with
`respect to its Motions to Exclude.
`The Board will provide a court reporter, and the transcript shall constitute
`the official record of the hearing.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00697 (Patent 7,905,815 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00698 (Patent 8,092,345 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00700 (Patent 8,579,767 B2)
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits shall be
`served on opposing counsel at least five business days prior to the hearing.
`The parties also shall provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits
`to the Board at least five business days prior to the hearing by emailing them
`to Trials@uspto.gov no later than the day before the hearing. The parties
`shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in these proceedings without prior
`authorization from the Board. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical,
`Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of
`Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for
`guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstratives
`with the Board at least two business days before the hearing. The objections
`should identify with particularity which portions of the demonstrative
`exhibits are subject to objection, include a copy of the objected-to portions,
`and include a one-sentence statement of the reason for each objection. No
`argument or further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider any
`objections and schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise,
`the Board will reserve ruling on the objections. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00697 (Patent 7,905,815 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00698 (Patent 8,092,345 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00700 (Patent 8,579,767 B2)
`
`conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`At least one member of the panel will be attending the oral argument
`remotely via electronic audio/visual communication equipment. The remote
`judge(s) will have access only to the courtesy copy of the demonstrative
`exhibits previously submitted by email, as discussed above. The parties are
`reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00697 (Patent 7,905,815 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00698 (Patent 8,092,345 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00700 (Patent 8,579,767 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Brian Ferguson
`brian.ferguson@weil.com
`
`Anish Desai
`anish.desai@weil.com
`
`Christopher T. Marando
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`
`W. Sutton Ansley
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`Robert T. Vlasis
`robert.vlasis@weil.com
`
`Zachary C. Garthe
`zachary.garthe@weil.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Mitchell Stockwell
`mstockwell@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Wab Kadaba
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Jonathan Olinger
`jolinger@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket