throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper 19
` Date: February 18, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIGNAL IP, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00860
`Patent 6,775,601 B2
`____________
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and
`CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`JUDGMENT AND FINAL WRITTEN DECISION
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73 and 35 U.S.C. § 318(a)
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`IPR2015-00860
`Patent 6,775,601 B2
`
`
`
`I. BACKGROUND
`Petitioner, Ford Motor Company, filed a Petition for inter partes
`review of claims 1–17 of U.S. Patent 6,775,601 B2 (the “’601 patent”) on
`March 13, 2015. Paper 1. Patent Owner, Signal IP, Inc. (“Signal IP”), filed
`a Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response on June 18, 2015. Paper 5. We
`instituted trial as to claims 1–17 of the ’601 patent on September 4, 2015.
`Paper 7. Signal IP subsequently filed a Patent Owner’s Response on
`November 25, 2015. Paper 16 (“Response” or “PO Resp.”). In the
`Response, Signal IP represents that in a concurrent Reexamination of the
`’601 patent (Control No. 90/013,385) it filed an amendment seeking to
`cancel claims 8–11, 13, 15, and 17. PO Resp. 1. Signal IP also represents
`that on the same day it filed a statutory disclaimer as to claims 1–7, 12, 14,
`and 16. Id.1 On December 28, 2015, Signal IP filed a copy of an Ex Parte
`Reexamination Certificate that issued in connection with the ’601 patent on
`December 23, 2015. Ex. 2007. That Certificate indicates that claims 8–11,
`13, 15, and 17 are cancelled. Id. at 1:15. Therefore, every claim subject to
`this inter partes review has been either disclaimed or canceled, and no
`claims remain in this trial.
`
`II. ANALYSIS
`As set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.73:
`(b) Request for adverse judgment. A party may request
`judgment against itself at any time during a proceeding. Actions
`construed to be a request for adverse judgment include: . . .
`(2) Cancellation or disclaimer of a claim such that the
`party has no remaining claim in the trial.
`
`
`1 The statutory disclaimer is entered in this proceeding as Exhibit 2005.
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00860
`Patent 6,775,601 B2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b), we construe the disclaimer of claims
`
`1–7, 12, 14, and 16 and cancellation of all remaining claims in this
`proceeding as a request for adverse judgment. We grant that request and
`enter judgment against Signal IP under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that judgment is entered under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73 against
`Signal IP with respect to claims 1–17 of the ’601 patent; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that this Order constitutes a Final Written
`Decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00860
`Patent 6,775,601 B2
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Frank A. Angileri
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`FPGP0117IPR1@brookskushman.com
`
`Lissi Mojica
`Kevin Greenleaf
`DENTONS US LLP
`iptdocketchi@dentons.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`ASCENDA LAW GROUP, PC
`tarek.fahimi@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket