`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: May 11, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD;
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`
`
`SURPASS TECH INNOVATION LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00887
`Patent US 7,420,550 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, BRYAN F. MOORE, and
`BETH Z. SHAW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SHAW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`On Request to File Corrected Reply to Patent Owners’ Opposition to
`Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude Evidence
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`This matter is before the Board on a request by Petitioner for
`authorization to file a Corrected Reply to Patent Owner’s Opposition to
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: May 11, 2016
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude Evidence (“Corrected Reply”). Paper 35.
`Petitioner seeks to file the Corrected Reply to correctly identify the company
`that engaged Mr. Michael Marentic. Id. Petitioner indicates that Patent
`Owner has no objections to the proposed revisions. Id.
`Upon consideration of the record, and for purposes of the Final
`Written Decision, Exhibit A of Paper 35 is accepted as the Corrected
`Reply.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request to file a Corrected Reply to
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude Evidence is
`granted and for purposes of the Final Written Decision, Exhibit A of Paper
`35 is accepted as the Corrected Reply.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: May 11, 2016
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jay Alexander
`Andrea Reister
`Gregory Discher
`Walter Hanley Jr.
`John Flock
`Covington & Burling LLP
`jalexander@cov.com
`areister@cov.com
`gdischer@cov.com
`whanley@kenyon.com
`jflock@kenyon.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Wayne Helge
`Michael Casey
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON &GOWDEY LLP
`whelge@dbjg.com
`mcasey@dbjg.com
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
