throbber
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
`GREEN BA Y DIVISION
`
`Kimberly-Clark \Vorldwide, Inc., and
`Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC,
`
`Case No.
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`Defendants.
`)
`-----------------------)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`First Quality Baby Products, LLC, and
`First Quality Consumer Products, LLC,
`
`COMPLA INT
`
`Plaintiffs, Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Gl obal Sales, LLC
`
`(collectively, " K-C" or " Plaintiffs"), by its attorneys, for its Complaint against Defendants, First
`
`Quali ty Baby Products, LLC ("FQBP"), and First Quality Consumer Products, LLC ("FQCP")
`
`(collectively, "First Quali ty" or "Defendants"), hereby demands a jury trial and alleges as
`
`follo ws:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`I.
`
`Kimberl y-C lark Worldwide, Inc. and Kimberly-C lark Global Sales, LLC are
`
`corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and having
`
`principal places of business within thi s di strict in Neenah, Wisconsin. K-C has manufacturing,
`
`research, sales and marketing offices and faci li ties in Neenah, Wisconsin.
`
`2.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant FQBP is a limited liability company
`
`organi zed and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a place of business at
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00993-WCG
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Filed 09/28112 Page 1 of 4 Document 1
`First Quality Exhibit 1002
`
`

`

`Lewistown, Pennsylvania, and Defendant FQCP is a limited liability company organized and
`
`existing under th e law of the State of Delaware wi th a place of business at Mc Elhattan,
`
`Pennsylvania.
`
`mRISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This action is for patent infringement under the patent laws of th e United States,
`
`35 U.S.C. § I el seq.
`
`4.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.c.
`
`§§ 133 1, I 338(a), and 1367.
`
`5.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants,
`
`inler alia, because
`
`Defendants' products, including their refastenable training pant products, are sold in, distributed
`
`to and shipped into the Eastern District of Wisconsin, and because upon information and belief
`
`Defendants have done and are doing business in Wisconsin, and in this judicial distri ct. Upon
`
`information and belief, Defendants have knowingly and intentionally placed their products,
`
`including their refastenable training pant products, into the stream of commerce through
`
`established distribution channels expecting them to be shipped into and purchased by customers
`
`in this judicial district.
`
`6.
`
`Venu e is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1391 (c), and
`
`1400(b). Upon information and belief, Defendants reside in the Eastern Distri ct of Wisconsin.
`
`COUNT 1-INFRlNGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,221,378
`
`7.
`
`On July 17, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 8,221,378 ("the '378 patent") to Robert L. Popp, Walter A. Mattingly,
`
`and Thomas E. Williamson who assigned to K-C the entire right, title, and interest to the ' 378
`
`patent, including all ri ghts to recover for all infringements thereof. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide,
`
`2
`Case 1:12-cv-00993-WCG Filed 09/28112 Page 2 of 4 Document 1
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Inc. is the owner and ass ignee of the <378 patent. Kimberl y-Clark Global Sal es, LLC is licensed
`
`under the ' 378 patent. A copy of the '378 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to
`
`infringe the ' 378 patent by making, selling and/or offering for sale a training pant product
`
`covered by one or more claims of the <378 patent.
`
`9.
`
`K-C has been damaged by Defendants' infringement.
`
`10.
`
`Furthennore, Defendants' acts of infringement have been without express or
`
`implied license by K-C, are in violation of K-C's ri ghts, and will continue unless enjoined by this
`
`Court.
`
`II.
`
`K-C has been and will continue to be irreparably hanned by Defendants'
`
`infringement of the '378 patent.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`12.
`
`Trial by Jury is hereby demanded.
`
`RELIEF SOUGHT
`
`WHEREFORE, K-C prays:
`
`A.
`
`For
`
`injunctive relief against furth er
`
`infringement of the
`
`' 378 patent by
`
`Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all those persons in acti ve
`
`concert or participation with anyone or more of them;
`
`B.
`
`For damages to compensate K-C for the infringement of the ' 378 patent, together
`
`with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`That K-C be awarded its fees and costs; and
`
`For al1 such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
`
`3
`Case 1:12-cv-00993-WCG Filed 09/28112 Page 3 of 4 Document 1
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`Dated: September 28, 2012
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: 51 Daniel T. Flaherty
`Daniel T. Flaherty
`GODFREY & KAHN , SC
`100 West Lawrence Street
`P.O. Box 2728
`Appleton, Wisconsin 549 12-2728
`Te lephone: (920) 830-2800
`Facsi mile: (920) 830-3530
`djlaher/y@gklaw.colll
`
`Anthony S. Baish
`GODFREY & KAHN , SC
`780 North Water Street
`Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
`Te lephone: (4 14) 273-3500
`Facsimile: (4 14) 273-5 198
`Ibaish@gklaw.com
`
`Marc S. Coopemlan
`1. Pieler van Es
`Aimee B. Kolz
`B ANNER & W ITCOFF, L TD.
`10 South Wacker Dri ve - Suite 3000
`Chicago, Ill inois 60606
`Te lephone: (3 12) 463-5000
`Facsi mile: (312) 463-500 I
`mcoopermon@banlwrwilcojJcom
`pvanes@banllerwilcoffcom
`akolz@ bannerwitcoffcom
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. and
`Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC
`
`4
`Case 1:12-cv-00993-WCG Filed 09128112 Page 4 of 4 Document 1
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket