`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SPHERIX INC.,
`Patent Owner
`____________________________________________
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00999
`
`Patent 7,397,763
`
`____________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`IPR2015-00999 (Patent 7,397,763)
`
`
`
`
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. respectfully moves that the Board recognize Mr.
`
`Michael De Vries and Mr. Adam Alper as counsel pro hac vice during this
`
`proceeding.
`
`1. Time for Filing
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed no sooner than
`
`twenty one (21) days after service of the Petition. See Notice of Filing Date,
`
`IPR2015-00999, paper no. 3, at 2.
`
`2. Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for Counsel Pro Hac Vice
`
`Petitioner has been authorized to file motions seeking admission pro hac
`
`vice under 37 C.F.R. 42.10(c). Id. Petitioner’s lead and back-up counsel are
`
`registered practitioners:
`
`Lead Counsel: David L. McCombs, USPTO Reg. No. 32,271;
`
`Backup Counsel: Theodore M. Foster, USPTO Reg. No. 57,456; and
`
`Michael S. Parsons, USPTO Reg. No. 58,767.
`
`The following statement of facts shows that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Mr. De Vries and Mr. Alper pro hac vice on behalf of
`
`Petitioner.
`
`Mr. De Vries and Mr. Alper are experienced litigators that have established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding from their
`
`representation of the Petitioner in Spherix Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc., Case No.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`IPR2015-00999 (Patent 7,397,763)
`
`
`
`
`
`1:14-cv-00393-SLR (D. Del. filed March 28, 2014) (“the co-pending litigation”),
`
`where the ’763 patent is being asserted against the Petitioner. The co-pending
`
`litigation involves the same subject patent, and if admitted, Mr. De Vries and Mr.
`
`Alper will be involved in the depositions that occur in this proceeding.
`
`Mr. De Vries and Mr. Alper have analyzed prior art references and claim
`
`charts in connection with invalidity contentions and have been involved in forming
`
`claim construction positions related to the claimed inventions, all of which are
`
`relevant to this inter partes review proceeding. Petitioner wishes to apply Mr. De
`
`Vries’s and Mr. Alper’s knowledge of the patent by employing them as counsel in
`
`this proceeding. Admission of Mr. De Vries and Mr. Alper pro hac vice will enable
`
`Petitioner to avoid unnecessary expense and duplication of work between this
`
`proceeding and the co-pending litigation.
`
`Petitioner’s lead and backup counsel are registered practitioners and Mr. De
`
`Vries and Mr. Alper are experienced litigation attorneys having familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Therefore, Petitioner respectfully
`
`submits that there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. De Vries and Mr.
`
`Alper as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`IPR2015-00999 (Patent 7,397,763)
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Declarations of Individuals Seeking to Appear
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is supported by the Declarations
`
`of Mr. De Vries and Mr. Alper (Exs. 1011 and 1012).
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/David L. McCombs/
`David L. McCombs
`Registration No. 32,217
`
`Dated: May 26, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`Customer No. 27683
`Telephone: 972/739-8636
`Facsimile: 214/200-0853
`Attorney Docket No.: 43614.255
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`IPR2015-00999 (Patent 7,397,763)
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`May 26, 2015
`
`Ex. 1001 U.S. Patent No. 7,397,763 to Bradd
`
`Ex. 1002 Prosecution File History of U.S. Patent App. No. 10/034,521 (the
`parent of the ’763 patent)
`
`Ex. 1003 Prosecution File History of U.S. Patent No. 7,397,763
`
`Ex. 1004 Declaration of Dr. Oliver Ibe under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68
`
`Ex. 1005 U.S. Patent No. 6,907,004 to Ramsey et al.
`
`Ex. 1006 Cisco Media Convergence Server 7830 Data Sheet, as archived by
`the Wayback Machine on Oct. 27, 2000, available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20001027155717/http://www.cisco.
`com/warp/public/cc/pd/mxsv/mxcvsr/prodlit/mcs78_ds.htm
`
`Ex. 1007 Scott Keagy, INTEGRATING VOICE AND DATA NETWORKS (2000),
`selected pages
`
`Ex. 1008 U.S. Patent No. 7,260,060 to Abaye et al.
`
`Ex. 1009 Copyright record for Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1010 Dated version of Cisco Media Convergence Server 7830, Ex. 1006
`
`Ex. 1011 Declaration of Mr. Adam R. Alper in support of Motion for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission
`
`Ex. 1012 Declaration of Mr. Michael W. De Vries in support of Motion for Pro
`Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`IPR2015-00999 (Patent 7,397,763)
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(a), this is to certify that I
`
`caused to be served a true and correct copy of the foregoing “PETITIONER’S
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(C)” as detailed below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date of service May 26, 2015
`
`Manner of service Electronic Mail to: DMcphail@cozen.com; and
`CWischhusen@cozen.com
`
`Documents served PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C);
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List; and
`Exhibits 1011-1012.
`
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`1627 I Street NW, Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`Persons served
`
`/David L. McCombs/
`
`
`
`
`David L. McCombs
`Registration No. 32,217
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-6-
`
`